| Message ID | 20130118114214.6698.24975.stgit@zurg (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
| Headers | show |
[+cc Rafael, author of patch you cited] On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org> wrote: > Bug was introduced in commit 23606cf5d1192c2b17912cb2ef6e62f9b11de133 > ("e1000e / PCI / PM: Add basic runtime PM support (rev. 4)") in v2.6.35 > > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org> > Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> > Cc: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 13 ++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c > index fbf75fd..2853c11 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c > @@ -5691,14 +5691,17 @@ static int e1000_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev); > struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev); > struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev); > + int retval; > + bool wake; > > - if (e1000e_pm_ready(adapter)) { > - bool wake; > + if (!e1000e_pm_ready(adapter)) > + return 0; > > - __e1000_shutdown(pdev, &wake, true); > - } > + retval = __e1000_shutdown(pdev, &wake, true); > + if (!retval) > + e1000_power_off(pdev, true, wake); > > - return 0; > + return retval; > } > > static int e1000_idle(struct device *dev) > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Monday, January 28, 2013 04:05:33 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > [+cc Rafael, author of patch you cited] > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov > <khlebnikov@openvz.org> wrote: > > Bug was introduced in commit 23606cf5d1192c2b17912cb2ef6e62f9b11de133 > > ("e1000e / PCI / PM: Add basic runtime PM support (rev. 4)") in v2.6.35 > > > > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org> > > Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> > > Cc: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 13 ++++++++----- > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c > > index fbf75fd..2853c11 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c > > @@ -5691,14 +5691,17 @@ static int e1000_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev); > > struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev); > > struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev); > > + int retval; > > + bool wake; > > > > - if (e1000e_pm_ready(adapter)) { > > - bool wake; > > + if (!e1000e_pm_ready(adapter)) > > + return 0; > > > > - __e1000_shutdown(pdev, &wake, true); > > - } > > + retval = __e1000_shutdown(pdev, &wake, true); > > + if (!retval) > > + e1000_power_off(pdev, true, wake); > > > > - return 0; > > + return retval; > > } > > > > static int e1000_idle(struct device *dev) > > I'd like the changelog to say what the bug is and how it is being fixed in general terms. Thanks, Rafael
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, January 28, 2013 04:05:33 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> [+cc Rafael, author of patch you cited] >> >> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov >> <khlebnikov@openvz.org> wrote: >>> Bug was introduced in commit 23606cf5d1192c2b17912cb2ef6e62f9b11de133 >>> ("e1000e / PCI / PM: Add basic runtime PM support (rev. 4)") in v2.6.35 >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov<khlebnikov@openvz.org> >>> Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>> Cc: Jeff Kirsher<jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> >>> Cc: Bruce Allan<bruce.w.allan@intel.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 13 ++++++++----- >>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c >>> index fbf75fd..2853c11 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c >>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c >>> @@ -5691,14 +5691,17 @@ static int e1000_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) >>> struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev); >>> struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev); >>> struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev); >>> + int retval; >>> + bool wake; >>> >>> - if (e1000e_pm_ready(adapter)) { >>> - bool wake; >>> + if (!e1000e_pm_ready(adapter)) >>> + return 0; >>> >>> - __e1000_shutdown(pdev,&wake, true); >>> - } >>> + retval = __e1000_shutdown(pdev,&wake, true); >>> + if (!retval) >>> + e1000_power_off(pdev, true, wake); >>> >>> - return 0; >>> + return retval; >>> } >>> >>> static int e1000_idle(struct device *dev) >>> > > I'd like the changelog to say what the bug is and how it is being fixed in > general terms. Ok, my bad. Problem: ethernet device does not work (no carrier signal). Right after boot it goes to runtime-suspend and never wake up. Original code (before your commit) calls pci_prepare_to_sleep() and it calls pci_enable_wake() and switches device to one of D3 state. It seems redundant, because pci_pm_runtime_suspend() do the same thing after calling ->runtime_suspend callback. Or rather it did it before commit 42eca2302146fed51335b95128e949ee6f54478f ("PCI: Don't touch card regs after runtime suspend D3") and third patch aimed fix this damage. More over seems like calling pci_enable_wake() from e1000e isn't enough for my case, because my enthernet cannot wakeup from runtime-suspend without third patch. Seems like it's because pci_enable_wake() and pci_finish_runtime_suspend() calls different pratform-pm callbacks -- platform_pci_run_wake() / platform_pci_sleep_wake(). All this looks messy and I don't know how it should work. If you prefer to minimize changes -- I can test how it would work without first (this) patch. Probably fine. > > Thanks, > Rafael > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:32:14 AM Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, January 28, 2013 04:05:33 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > >> [+cc Rafael, author of patch you cited] > >> > >> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov > >> <khlebnikov@openvz.org> wrote: > >>> Bug was introduced in commit 23606cf5d1192c2b17912cb2ef6e62f9b11de133 > >>> ("e1000e / PCI / PM: Add basic runtime PM support (rev. 4)") in v2.6.35 > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov<khlebnikov@openvz.org> > >>> Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > >>> Cc: Jeff Kirsher<jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> > >>> Cc: Bruce Allan<bruce.w.allan@intel.com> > >>> --- > >>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 13 ++++++++----- > >>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c > >>> index fbf75fd..2853c11 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c > >>> @@ -5691,14 +5691,17 @@ static int e1000_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) > >>> struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev); > >>> struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev); > >>> struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev); > >>> + int retval; > >>> + bool wake; > >>> > >>> - if (e1000e_pm_ready(adapter)) { > >>> - bool wake; > >>> + if (!e1000e_pm_ready(adapter)) > >>> + return 0; > >>> > >>> - __e1000_shutdown(pdev,&wake, true); > >>> - } > >>> + retval = __e1000_shutdown(pdev,&wake, true); > >>> + if (!retval) > >>> + e1000_power_off(pdev, true, wake); > >>> > >>> - return 0; > >>> + return retval; > >>> } > >>> > >>> static int e1000_idle(struct device *dev) > >>> > > > > I'd like the changelog to say what the bug is and how it is being fixed in > > general terms. > > Ok, my bad. > > Problem: ethernet device does not work (no carrier signal). > Right after boot it goes to runtime-suspend and never wake up. > > Original code (before your commit) calls pci_prepare_to_sleep() and it > calls pci_enable_wake() and switches device to one of D3 state. > > It seems redundant, because pci_pm_runtime_suspend() do the same thing > after calling ->runtime_suspend callback. Or rather it did it before commit > 42eca2302146fed51335b95128e949ee6f54478f ("PCI: Don't touch card regs after > runtime suspend D3") and third patch aimed fix this damage. > > More over seems like calling pci_enable_wake() from e1000e isn't enough for my case, > because my enthernet cannot wakeup from runtime-suspend without third patch. > Seems like it's because pci_enable_wake() and pci_finish_runtime_suspend() > calls different pratform-pm callbacks -- platform_pci_run_wake() / > platform_pci_sleep_wake(). > > All this looks messy and I don't know how it should work. > > If you prefer to minimize changes -- I can test how it would work without > first (this) patch. Probably fine. OK, I need to have a look at that driver, then. Please give me some time, though, I'm working on something different at the moment. And by the way, by sending patches you declare that you know what you're doing. If you really don't, it's better to just describe the problem. :-) Thanks, Rafael
On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:32:14 AM Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, January 28, 2013 04:05:33 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > >> [+cc Rafael, author of patch you cited] > >> > >> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov > >> <khlebnikov@openvz.org> wrote: > >>> Bug was introduced in commit 23606cf5d1192c2b17912cb2ef6e62f9b11de133 > >>> ("e1000e / PCI / PM: Add basic runtime PM support (rev. 4)") in v2.6.35 > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov<khlebnikov@openvz.org> > >>> Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > >>> Cc: Jeff Kirsher<jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> > >>> Cc: Bruce Allan<bruce.w.allan@intel.com> > >>> --- > >>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 13 ++++++++----- > >>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c > >>> index fbf75fd..2853c11 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c > >>> @@ -5691,14 +5691,17 @@ static int e1000_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) > >>> struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev); > >>> struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev); > >>> struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev); > >>> + int retval; > >>> + bool wake; > >>> > >>> - if (e1000e_pm_ready(adapter)) { > >>> - bool wake; > >>> + if (!e1000e_pm_ready(adapter)) > >>> + return 0; > >>> > >>> - __e1000_shutdown(pdev,&wake, true); > >>> - } > >>> + retval = __e1000_shutdown(pdev,&wake, true); > >>> + if (!retval) > >>> + e1000_power_off(pdev, true, wake); > >>> > >>> - return 0; > >>> + return retval; > >>> } > >>> > >>> static int e1000_idle(struct device *dev) > >>> > > > > I'd like the changelog to say what the bug is and how it is being fixed in > > general terms. > > Ok, my bad. > > Problem: ethernet device does not work (no carrier signal). > Right after boot it goes to runtime-suspend and never wake up. > > Original code (before your commit) calls pci_prepare_to_sleep() and it > calls pci_enable_wake() and switches device to one of D3 state. The original code in what function? > It seems redundant, because pci_pm_runtime_suspend() do the same thing > after calling ->runtime_suspend callback. Or rather it did it before commit > 42eca2302146fed51335b95128e949ee6f54478f ("PCI: Don't touch card regs after > runtime suspend D3") and third patch aimed fix this damage. > > More over seems like calling pci_enable_wake() from e1000e isn't enough for my case, > because my enthernet cannot wakeup from runtime-suspend without third patch. Which third patch? > Seems like it's because pci_enable_wake() and pci_finish_runtime_suspend() > calls different pratform-pm callbacks -- platform_pci_run_wake() / > platform_pci_sleep_wake(). That's correct, for historical reasons. We'll need to merge these things, but for now the are separate (because of the way ACPI handles system suspend and runtime PM). Thanks, Rafael
On Friday, January 18, 2013 03:42:14 PM Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > Bug was introduced in commit 23606cf5d1192c2b17912cb2ef6e62f9b11de133 > ("e1000e / PCI / PM: Add basic runtime PM support (rev. 4)") in v2.6.35 > > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org> > Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> > Cc: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 13 ++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c > index fbf75fd..2853c11 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c > @@ -5691,14 +5691,17 @@ static int e1000_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev); > struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev); > struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev); > + int retval; > + bool wake; > > - if (e1000e_pm_ready(adapter)) { > - bool wake; > + if (!e1000e_pm_ready(adapter)) > + return 0; > > - __e1000_shutdown(pdev, &wake, true); > - } > + retval = __e1000_shutdown(pdev, &wake, true); > + if (!retval) > + e1000_power_off(pdev, true, wake); That needs to be pci_finish_runtime_suspend() (which needs to be exported for this purpose) or remove the pci_save_state() from __e1000_shutdown(). If the latter works, I'd very much prefer it. Thanks, Rafael
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:32:14 AM Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: >> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Monday, January 28, 2013 04:05:33 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>>> [+cc Rafael, author of patch you cited] >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov >>>> <khlebnikov@openvz.org> wrote: >>>>> Bug was introduced in commit 23606cf5d1192c2b17912cb2ef6e62f9b11de133 >>>>> ("e1000e / PCI / PM: Add basic runtime PM support (rev. 4)") in v2.6.35 >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov<khlebnikov@openvz.org> >>>>> Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>> Cc: Jeff Kirsher<jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> >>>>> Cc: Bruce Allan<bruce.w.allan@intel.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 13 ++++++++----- >>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c >>>>> index fbf75fd..2853c11 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c >>>>> @@ -5691,14 +5691,17 @@ static int e1000_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) >>>>> struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev); >>>>> struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev); >>>>> struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev); >>>>> + int retval; >>>>> + bool wake; >>>>> >>>>> - if (e1000e_pm_ready(adapter)) { >>>>> - bool wake; >>>>> + if (!e1000e_pm_ready(adapter)) >>>>> + return 0; >>>>> >>>>> - __e1000_shutdown(pdev,&wake, true); >>>>> - } >>>>> + retval = __e1000_shutdown(pdev,&wake, true); >>>>> + if (!retval) >>>>> + e1000_power_off(pdev, true, wake); >>>>> >>>>> - return 0; >>>>> + return retval; >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> static int e1000_idle(struct device *dev) >>>>> >>> >>> I'd like the changelog to say what the bug is and how it is being fixed in >>> general terms. >> >> Ok, my bad. >> >> Problem: ethernet device does not work (no carrier signal). >> Right after boot it goes to runtime-suspend and never wake up. >> >> Original code (before your commit) calls pci_prepare_to_sleep() and it >> calls pci_enable_wake() and switches device to one of D3 state. > > The original code in what function? Oh, I screwed up again. That commit adds support of runtime-pm, so there is no original code. But runtime-pm in 'igb' works in this way: igb_runtime_suspend() -> pci_prepare_to_sleep() -> pci_enable_wake() > >> It seems redundant, because pci_pm_runtime_suspend() do the same thing >> after calling ->runtime_suspend callback. Or rather it did it before commit >> 42eca2302146fed51335b95128e949ee6f54478f ("PCI: Don't touch card regs after >> runtime suspend D3") and third patch aimed fix this damage. >> >> More over seems like calling pci_enable_wake() from e1000e isn't enough for my case, >> because my enthernet cannot wakeup from runtime-suspend without third patch. > > Which third patch? third patch in this patchset: "[PATCH 3/5] PCI: revert preparing for wakeup in runtime-suspend finalization" > >> Seems like it's because pci_enable_wake() and pci_finish_runtime_suspend() >> calls different pratform-pm callbacks -- platform_pci_run_wake() / >> platform_pci_sleep_wake(). > > That's correct, for historical reasons. We'll need to merge these things, but > for now the are separate (because of the way ACPI handles system suspend and > runtime PM). Ok, I have not read yet all code and documentation. But it seems runtime-pm engine needs some sort of runtime debug-mode which would warn about strange or ineffective actions in drivers, probably just script for parsing kernel-log and tracking states for all devices and buses. > > Thanks, > Rafael > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c index fbf75fd..2853c11 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c @@ -5691,14 +5691,17 @@ static int e1000_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev); struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev); struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev); + int retval; + bool wake; - if (e1000e_pm_ready(adapter)) { - bool wake; + if (!e1000e_pm_ready(adapter)) + return 0; - __e1000_shutdown(pdev, &wake, true); - } + retval = __e1000_shutdown(pdev, &wake, true); + if (!retval) + e1000_power_off(pdev, true, wake); - return 0; + return retval; } static int e1000_idle(struct device *dev)
Bug was introduced in commit 23606cf5d1192c2b17912cb2ef6e62f9b11de133 ("e1000e / PCI / PM: Add basic runtime PM support (rev. 4)") in v2.6.35 Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org> Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> Cc: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html