Message ID | 20190531150923.12376-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
Headers | show |
Series | PCI: hv: Fix build error without CONFIG_SYSFS | expand |
From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 8:09 AM > > while building without CONFIG_SYSFS, fails as below: > > drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'hv_pci_assign_slots': > pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0x40a): undefined reference to 'pci_create_slot' > drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'pci_devices_present_work': > pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0xc02): undefined reference to 'pci_destroy_slot' > drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'hv_pci_remove': > pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0xe50): undefined reference to 'pci_destroy_slot' > drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'hv_eject_device_work': > pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0x11f9): undefined reference to 'pci_destroy_slot' > > Select SYSFS while PCI_HYPERV is set to fix this. > I'm wondering if is the right way to fix the problem. Conceptually is it possible to setup & operate virtual PCI devices like pci-hyperv.c does, even if sysfs is not present? Or is it right to always required sysfs? The function pci_dev_assign_slot() in slot.c has a null implementation in include/linux/pci.h when CONFIG_SYSFS is not defined, which seems to be trying to solve the same problem for that function. And if CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI is defined but CONFIG_SYSFS is not, pci_hp_create_module_link() and pci_hp_remove_module_link() look like they would have the same problem. Maybe there should be degenerate implementations of pci_create_slot() and pci_destroy_slot() for cases when CONFIG_SYSFS is not defined? But I'll admit I don't know the full story behind how PCI slots are represented and used, so maybe I'm off base. I just noticed the inconsistency in how other functions in slot.c are handled. Thoughts? Michael
Hi all, Friendly ping... On 2019/5/31 23:09, YueHaibing wrote: > while building without CONFIG_SYSFS, fails as below: > > drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'hv_pci_assign_slots': > pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0x40a): undefined reference to 'pci_create_slot' > drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'pci_devices_present_work': > pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0xc02): undefined reference to 'pci_destroy_slot' > drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'hv_pci_remove': > pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0xe50): undefined reference to 'pci_destroy_slot' > drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'hv_eject_device_work': > pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0x11f9): undefined reference to 'pci_destroy_slot' > > Select SYSFS while PCI_HYPERV is set to fix this. > > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> > Fixes: a15f2c08c708 ("PCI: hv: support reporting serial number as slot information") > Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> > --- > drivers/pci/Kconfig | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/Kconfig > index 2ab9240..6722952 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/pci/Kconfig > @@ -182,6 +182,7 @@ config PCI_LABEL > config PCI_HYPERV > tristate "Hyper-V PCI Frontend" > depends on X86 && HYPERV && PCI_MSI && PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN && X86_64 > + select SYSFS > help > The PCI device frontend driver allows the kernel to import arbitrary > PCI devices from a PCI backend to support PCI driver domains. >
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 10:19:10PM +0800, Yuehaibing wrote: > Hi all, > > Friendly ping... We should address Michael's question: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/BYAPR21MB12211EEA95200F437C8E37ECD71A0@BYAPR21MB1221.namprd21.prod.outlook.com/ Lorenzo > On 2019/5/31 23:09, YueHaibing wrote: > > while building without CONFIG_SYSFS, fails as below: > > > > drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'hv_pci_assign_slots': > > pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0x40a): undefined reference to 'pci_create_slot' > > drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'pci_devices_present_work': > > pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0xc02): undefined reference to 'pci_destroy_slot' > > drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'hv_pci_remove': > > pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0xe50): undefined reference to 'pci_destroy_slot' > > drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'hv_eject_device_work': > > pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0x11f9): undefined reference to 'pci_destroy_slot' > > > > Select SYSFS while PCI_HYPERV is set to fix this. > > > > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> > > Fixes: a15f2c08c708 ("PCI: hv: support reporting serial number as slot information") > > Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> > > --- > > drivers/pci/Kconfig | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/Kconfig > > index 2ab9240..6722952 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/pci/Kconfig > > @@ -182,6 +182,7 @@ config PCI_LABEL > > config PCI_HYPERV > > tristate "Hyper-V PCI Frontend" > > depends on X86 && HYPERV && PCI_MSI && PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN && X86_64 > > + select SYSFS > > help > > The PCI device frontend driver allows the kernel to import arbitrary > > PCI devices from a PCI backend to support PCI driver domains. > > >
On 2019/6/2 6:59, Michael Kelley wrote: > From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 8:09 AM >> >> while building without CONFIG_SYSFS, fails as below: >> >> drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'hv_pci_assign_slots': >> pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0x40a): undefined reference to 'pci_create_slot' >> drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'pci_devices_present_work': >> pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0xc02): undefined reference to 'pci_destroy_slot' >> drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'hv_pci_remove': >> pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0xe50): undefined reference to 'pci_destroy_slot' >> drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'hv_eject_device_work': >> pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0x11f9): undefined reference to 'pci_destroy_slot' >> >> Select SYSFS while PCI_HYPERV is set to fix this. >> > > I'm wondering if is the right way to fix the problem. Conceptually > is it possible to setup & operate virtual PCI devices like > pci-hyperv.c does, even if sysfs is not present? Or is it right to > always required sysfs? > > The function pci_dev_assign_slot() in slot.c has a null implementation > in include/linux/pci.h when CONFIG_SYSFS is not defined, which > seems to be trying to solve the same problem for that function. And > if CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI is defined but CONFIG_SYSFS is not, > pci_hp_create_module_link() and pci_hp_remove_module_link() > look like they would have the same problem. Maybe there should > be degenerate implementations of pci_create_slot() and > pci_destroy_slot() for cases when CONFIG_SYSFS is not defined? > > But I'll admit I don't know the full story behind how PCI slots > are represented and used, so maybe I'm off base. I just noticed > the inconsistency in how other functions in slot.c are handled. > > Thoughts? 268a03a42d33 ("PCI: drivers/pci/slot.c should depend on CONFIG_SYSFS") make slot.o depends CONFIG_SYSFS commit 268a03a42d3377d5fb41e6e7cbdec4e0b65cab2e Author: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Date: Wed Jun 17 19:03:57 2009 -0600 PCI: drivers/pci/slot.c should depend on CONFIG_SYSFS There is no way to interact with a physical PCI slot without sysfs, so encode the dependency and prevent this build error: drivers/pci/slot.c: In function 'pci_hp_create_module_link': drivers/pci/slot.c:327: error: 'module_kset' undeclared This patch _should_ make pci-sysfs.o depend on CONFIG_SYSFS too, but we cannot (yet) because the PCI core merrily assumes the existence of sysfs: drivers/built-in.o: In function `pci_bus_add_device': drivers/pci/bus.c:89: undefined reference to `pci_create_sysfs_dev_files' drivers/built-in.o: In function `pci_stop_dev': drivers/pci/remove.c:24: undefined reference to `pci_remove_sysfs_dev_files' So do the minimal bit for now and figure out how to untangle it later. If No CONFIG_SYSFS, slot.o is not build > > Michael > >
+cc Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> On 2019/6/15 14:18, Yuehaibing wrote: > > On 2019/6/2 6:59, Michael Kelley wrote: >> From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 8:09 AM >>> >>> while building without CONFIG_SYSFS, fails as below: >>> >>> drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'hv_pci_assign_slots': >>> pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0x40a): undefined reference to 'pci_create_slot' >>> drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'pci_devices_present_work': >>> pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0xc02): undefined reference to 'pci_destroy_slot' >>> drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'hv_pci_remove': >>> pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0xe50): undefined reference to 'pci_destroy_slot' >>> drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'hv_eject_device_work': >>> pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0x11f9): undefined reference to 'pci_destroy_slot' >>> >>> Select SYSFS while PCI_HYPERV is set to fix this. >>> >> >> I'm wondering if is the right way to fix the problem. Conceptually >> is it possible to setup & operate virtual PCI devices like >> pci-hyperv.c does, even if sysfs is not present? Or is it right to >> always required sysfs? >> >> The function pci_dev_assign_slot() in slot.c has a null implementation >> in include/linux/pci.h when CONFIG_SYSFS is not defined, which >> seems to be trying to solve the same problem for that function. And >> if CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI is defined but CONFIG_SYSFS is not, >> pci_hp_create_module_link() and pci_hp_remove_module_link() >> look like they would have the same problem. Maybe there should >> be degenerate implementations of pci_create_slot() and >> pci_destroy_slot() for cases when CONFIG_SYSFS is not defined? >> >> But I'll admit I don't know the full story behind how PCI slots >> are represented and used, so maybe I'm off base. I just noticed >> the inconsistency in how other functions in slot.c are handled. >> >> Thoughts? > > 268a03a42d33 ("PCI: drivers/pci/slot.c should depend on CONFIG_SYSFS") > > make slot.o depends CONFIG_SYSFS > > commit 268a03a42d3377d5fb41e6e7cbdec4e0b65cab2e > Author: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> > Date: Wed Jun 17 19:03:57 2009 -0600 > > PCI: drivers/pci/slot.c should depend on CONFIG_SYSFS > > There is no way to interact with a physical PCI slot without > sysfs, so encode the dependency and prevent this build error: > > drivers/pci/slot.c: In function 'pci_hp_create_module_link': > drivers/pci/slot.c:327: error: 'module_kset' undeclared > > This patch _should_ make pci-sysfs.o depend on CONFIG_SYSFS too, > but we cannot (yet) because the PCI core merrily assumes the > existence of sysfs: > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `pci_bus_add_device': > drivers/pci/bus.c:89: undefined reference to `pci_create_sysfs_dev_files' > drivers/built-in.o: In function `pci_stop_dev': > drivers/pci/remove.c:24: undefined reference to `pci_remove_sysfs_dev_files' > > So do the minimal bit for now and figure out how to untangle it > later. > > If No CONFIG_SYSFS, slot.o is not build > >> >> Michael >> >> > > > . >
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 02:48:24PM +0800, Yuehaibing wrote: > +cc Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Can we drop this patch and merge: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1131444/ instead ? Thanks, Lorenzo > > On 2019/6/15 14:18, Yuehaibing wrote: > > > > On 2019/6/2 6:59, Michael Kelley wrote: > >> From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 8:09 AM > >>> > >>> while building without CONFIG_SYSFS, fails as below: > >>> > >>> drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'hv_pci_assign_slots': > >>> pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0x40a): undefined reference to 'pci_create_slot' > >>> drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'pci_devices_present_work': > >>> pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0xc02): undefined reference to 'pci_destroy_slot' > >>> drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'hv_pci_remove': > >>> pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0xe50): undefined reference to 'pci_destroy_slot' > >>> drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'hv_eject_device_work': > >>> pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0x11f9): undefined reference to 'pci_destroy_slot' > >>> > >>> Select SYSFS while PCI_HYPERV is set to fix this. > >>> > >> > >> I'm wondering if is the right way to fix the problem. Conceptually > >> is it possible to setup & operate virtual PCI devices like > >> pci-hyperv.c does, even if sysfs is not present? Or is it right to > >> always required sysfs? > >> > >> The function pci_dev_assign_slot() in slot.c has a null implementation > >> in include/linux/pci.h when CONFIG_SYSFS is not defined, which > >> seems to be trying to solve the same problem for that function. And > >> if CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI is defined but CONFIG_SYSFS is not, > >> pci_hp_create_module_link() and pci_hp_remove_module_link() > >> look like they would have the same problem. Maybe there should > >> be degenerate implementations of pci_create_slot() and > >> pci_destroy_slot() for cases when CONFIG_SYSFS is not defined? > >> > >> But I'll admit I don't know the full story behind how PCI slots > >> are represented and used, so maybe I'm off base. I just noticed > >> the inconsistency in how other functions in slot.c are handled. > >> > >> Thoughts? > > > > 268a03a42d33 ("PCI: drivers/pci/slot.c should depend on CONFIG_SYSFS") > > > > make slot.o depends CONFIG_SYSFS > > > > commit 268a03a42d3377d5fb41e6e7cbdec4e0b65cab2e > > Author: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> > > Date: Wed Jun 17 19:03:57 2009 -0600 > > > > PCI: drivers/pci/slot.c should depend on CONFIG_SYSFS > > > > There is no way to interact with a physical PCI slot without > > sysfs, so encode the dependency and prevent this build error: > > > > drivers/pci/slot.c: In function 'pci_hp_create_module_link': > > drivers/pci/slot.c:327: error: 'module_kset' undeclared > > > > This patch _should_ make pci-sysfs.o depend on CONFIG_SYSFS too, > > but we cannot (yet) because the PCI core merrily assumes the > > existence of sysfs: > > > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `pci_bus_add_device': > > drivers/pci/bus.c:89: undefined reference to `pci_create_sysfs_dev_files' > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `pci_stop_dev': > > drivers/pci/remove.c:24: undefined reference to `pci_remove_sysfs_dev_files' > > > > So do the minimal bit for now and figure out how to untangle it > > later. > > > > If No CONFIG_SYSFS, slot.o is not build > > > >> > >> Michael > >> > >> > > > > > > . > > >
On 2019/8/13 18:18, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 02:48:24PM +0800, Yuehaibing wrote: >> +cc Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> > > Can we drop this patch and merge: > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1131444/ > > instead ? Ok, it looks good to me, thanks! > > Thanks, > Lorenzo > >> >> On 2019/6/15 14:18, Yuehaibing wrote: >>> >>> On 2019/6/2 6:59, Michael Kelley wrote: >>>> From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 8:09 AM >>>>> >>>>> while building without CONFIG_SYSFS, fails as below: >>>>> >>>>> drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'hv_pci_assign_slots': >>>>> pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0x40a): undefined reference to 'pci_create_slot' >>>>> drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'pci_devices_present_work': >>>>> pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0xc02): undefined reference to 'pci_destroy_slot' >>>>> drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'hv_pci_remove': >>>>> pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0xe50): undefined reference to 'pci_destroy_slot' >>>>> drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'hv_eject_device_work': >>>>> pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0x11f9): undefined reference to 'pci_destroy_slot' >>>>> >>>>> Select SYSFS while PCI_HYPERV is set to fix this. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I'm wondering if is the right way to fix the problem. Conceptually >>>> is it possible to setup & operate virtual PCI devices like >>>> pci-hyperv.c does, even if sysfs is not present? Or is it right to >>>> always required sysfs? >>>> >>>> The function pci_dev_assign_slot() in slot.c has a null implementation >>>> in include/linux/pci.h when CONFIG_SYSFS is not defined, which >>>> seems to be trying to solve the same problem for that function. And >>>> if CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI is defined but CONFIG_SYSFS is not, >>>> pci_hp_create_module_link() and pci_hp_remove_module_link() >>>> look like they would have the same problem. Maybe there should >>>> be degenerate implementations of pci_create_slot() and >>>> pci_destroy_slot() for cases when CONFIG_SYSFS is not defined? >>>> >>>> But I'll admit I don't know the full story behind how PCI slots >>>> are represented and used, so maybe I'm off base. I just noticed >>>> the inconsistency in how other functions in slot.c are handled. >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>> >>> 268a03a42d33 ("PCI: drivers/pci/slot.c should depend on CONFIG_SYSFS") >>> >>> make slot.o depends CONFIG_SYSFS >>> >>> commit 268a03a42d3377d5fb41e6e7cbdec4e0b65cab2e >>> Author: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> >>> Date: Wed Jun 17 19:03:57 2009 -0600 >>> >>> PCI: drivers/pci/slot.c should depend on CONFIG_SYSFS >>> >>> There is no way to interact with a physical PCI slot without >>> sysfs, so encode the dependency and prevent this build error: >>> >>> drivers/pci/slot.c: In function 'pci_hp_create_module_link': >>> drivers/pci/slot.c:327: error: 'module_kset' undeclared >>> >>> This patch _should_ make pci-sysfs.o depend on CONFIG_SYSFS too, >>> but we cannot (yet) because the PCI core merrily assumes the >>> existence of sysfs: >>> >>> drivers/built-in.o: In function `pci_bus_add_device': >>> drivers/pci/bus.c:89: undefined reference to `pci_create_sysfs_dev_files' >>> drivers/built-in.o: In function `pci_stop_dev': >>> drivers/pci/remove.c:24: undefined reference to `pci_remove_sysfs_dev_files' >>> >>> So do the minimal bit for now and figure out how to untangle it >>> later. >>> >>> If No CONFIG_SYSFS, slot.o is not build >>> >>>> >>>> Michael >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> . >>> >> > > . >
diff --git a/drivers/pci/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/Kconfig index 2ab9240..6722952 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/pci/Kconfig @@ -182,6 +182,7 @@ config PCI_LABEL config PCI_HYPERV tristate "Hyper-V PCI Frontend" depends on X86 && HYPERV && PCI_MSI && PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN && X86_64 + select SYSFS help The PCI device frontend driver allows the kernel to import arbitrary PCI devices from a PCI backend to support PCI driver domains.
while building without CONFIG_SYSFS, fails as below: drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'hv_pci_assign_slots': pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0x40a): undefined reference to 'pci_create_slot' drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'pci_devices_present_work': pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0xc02): undefined reference to 'pci_destroy_slot' drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'hv_pci_remove': pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0xe50): undefined reference to 'pci_destroy_slot' drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.o: In function 'hv_eject_device_work': pci-hyperv.c:(.text+0x11f9): undefined reference to 'pci_destroy_slot' Select SYSFS while PCI_HYPERV is set to fix this. Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Fixes: a15f2c08c708 ("PCI: hv: support reporting serial number as slot information") Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> --- drivers/pci/Kconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)