diff mbox series

PCI/DPC: Fix use-after-free on concurrent DPC and hot-removal

Message ID 8e4bcd4116fd94f592f2bf2749f168099c480ddf.1718707743.git.lukas@wunner.de (mailing list archive)
State New
Delegated to: Bjorn Helgaas
Headers show
Series PCI/DPC: Fix use-after-free on concurrent DPC and hot-removal | expand

Commit Message

Lukas Wunner June 18, 2024, 10:54 a.m. UTC
Keith reports a use-after-free when a DPC event occurs concurrently to
hot-removal of the same portion of the hierarchy:

The dpc_handler() awaits readiness of the secondary bus below the
Downstream Port where the DPC event occurred.  To do so, it polls the
config space of the first child device on the secondary bus.  If that
child device is concurrently removed, accesses to its struct pci_dev
cause the kernel to oops.

That's because pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() neglects to hold a
reference on the child device.  Before v6.3, the function was only
called on resume from system sleep or on runtime resume.  Holding a
reference wasn't necessary back then because the pciehp IRQ thread
could never run concurrently.  (On resume from system sleep, IRQs are
not enabled until after the resume_noirq phase.  And runtime resume is
always awaited before a PCI device is removed.)

However starting with v6.3, pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() is also
called on a DPC event.  Commit 53b54ad074de ("PCI/DPC: Await readiness
of secondary bus after reset"), which introduced that, failed to
appreciate that pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() now needs to hold a
reference on the child device because dpc_handler() and pciehp may
indeed run concurrently.  The commit was backported to v5.10+ stable
kernels, so that's the oldest one affected.

Add the missing reference acquisition.

Abridged stack trace:

  BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000091400c0
  CPU: 15 PID: 2464 Comm: irq/53-pcie-dpc 6.9.0
  RIP: pci_bus_read_config_dword+0x17/0x50
  pci_dev_wait()
  pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus()
  dpc_reset_link()
  pcie_do_recovery()
  dpc_handler()

Fixes: 53b54ad074de ("PCI/DPC: Await readiness of secondary bus after reset")
Reported-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240612181625.3604512-3-kbusch@meta.com/
Tested-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.10+
---
 drivers/pci/pci.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Mika Westerberg June 18, 2024, 11:37 a.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 12:54:55PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Keith reports a use-after-free when a DPC event occurs concurrently to
> hot-removal of the same portion of the hierarchy:
> 
> The dpc_handler() awaits readiness of the secondary bus below the
> Downstream Port where the DPC event occurred.  To do so, it polls the
> config space of the first child device on the secondary bus.  If that
> child device is concurrently removed, accesses to its struct pci_dev
> cause the kernel to oops.
> 
> That's because pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() neglects to hold a
> reference on the child device.  Before v6.3, the function was only
> called on resume from system sleep or on runtime resume.  Holding a
> reference wasn't necessary back then because the pciehp IRQ thread
> could never run concurrently.  (On resume from system sleep, IRQs are
> not enabled until after the resume_noirq phase.  And runtime resume is
> always awaited before a PCI device is removed.)
> 
> However starting with v6.3, pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() is also
> called on a DPC event.  Commit 53b54ad074de ("PCI/DPC: Await readiness
> of secondary bus after reset"), which introduced that, failed to
> appreciate that pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() now needs to hold a
> reference on the child device because dpc_handler() and pciehp may
> indeed run concurrently.  The commit was backported to v5.10+ stable
> kernels, so that's the oldest one affected.
> 
> Add the missing reference acquisition.
> 
> Abridged stack trace:
> 
>   BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000091400c0
>   CPU: 15 PID: 2464 Comm: irq/53-pcie-dpc 6.9.0
>   RIP: pci_bus_read_config_dword+0x17/0x50
>   pci_dev_wait()
>   pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus()
>   dpc_reset_link()
>   pcie_do_recovery()
>   dpc_handler()
> 
> Fixes: 53b54ad074de ("PCI/DPC: Await readiness of secondary bus after reset")
> Reported-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240612181625.3604512-3-kbusch@meta.com/
> Tested-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>

Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Keith Busch June 18, 2024, 4:12 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 12:54:55PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> However starting with v6.3, pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() is also
> called on a DPC event.  Commit 53b54ad074de ("PCI/DPC: Await readiness
> of secondary bus after reset"), which introduced that, failed to
> appreciate that pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() now needs to hold a
> reference on the child device because dpc_handler() and pciehp may
> indeed run concurrently.  The commit was backported to v5.10+ stable
> kernels, so that's the oldest one affected.

Caution on applying this to 5.10 and 5.15 stable branches: they don't
have the fancy "__free" cleanup you're using here. The newer active
stables are okay, though.

>  int pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus(struct pci_dev *dev, char *reset_type)
>  {
> -	struct pci_dev *child;
> +	struct pci_dev *child __free(pci_dev_put) = NULL;
>  	int delay;
Lukas Wunner June 18, 2024, 4:56 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 10:12:32AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 12:54:55PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > However starting with v6.3, pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() is also
> > called on a DPC event.  Commit 53b54ad074de ("PCI/DPC: Await readiness
> > of secondary bus after reset"), which introduced that, failed to
> > appreciate that pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() now needs to hold a
> > reference on the child device because dpc_handler() and pciehp may
> > indeed run concurrently.  The commit was backported to v5.10+ stable
> > kernels, so that's the oldest one affected.
> 
> Caution on applying this to 5.10 and 5.15 stable branches: they don't
> have the fancy "__free" cleanup you're using here. The newer active
> stables are okay, though.

I'll let Greg & Sasha know when they start applying this to stable
kernels that ced085ef369a is a prerequisite for v5.10-stable and
v5.15-stable.  I can rework the patch if they don't want to apply
ced085ef369a to these older versions.

Thanks,

Lukas
Keith Busch June 26, 2024, 7:38 p.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 12:54:55PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Add the missing reference acquisition.
> 
> Abridged stack trace:
> 
>   BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000091400c0
>   CPU: 15 PID: 2464 Comm: irq/53-pcie-dpc 6.9.0
>   RIP: pci_bus_read_config_dword+0x17/0x50
>   pci_dev_wait()
>   pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus()
>   dpc_reset_link()
>   pcie_do_recovery()
>   dpc_handler()
> 
> Fixes: 53b54ad074de ("PCI/DPC: Await readiness of secondary bus after reset")
> Reported-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240612181625.3604512-3-kbusch@meta.com/
> Tested-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.10+

Hey, it's been some time, so just wanted to check on this patch status.
It's still a good fix.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index d2c388761ba9..0e7cb507a5d6 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -4753,7 +4753,7 @@  static int pci_bus_max_d3cold_delay(const struct pci_bus *bus)
  */
 int pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus(struct pci_dev *dev, char *reset_type)
 {
-	struct pci_dev *child;
+	struct pci_dev *child __free(pci_dev_put) = NULL;
 	int delay;
 
 	if (pci_dev_is_disconnected(dev))
@@ -4782,8 +4782,8 @@  int pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus(struct pci_dev *dev, char *reset_type)
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	child = list_first_entry(&dev->subordinate->devices, struct pci_dev,
-				 bus_list);
+	child = pci_dev_get(list_first_entry(&dev->subordinate->devices,
+					     struct pci_dev, bus_list));
 	up_read(&pci_bus_sem);
 
 	/*