| Message ID | d818f9c9-a432-213e-4152-eaff3b7da52e@oderland.se (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v2] PCI/MSI: Correct use of can_mask in msi_add_msi_desc() | expand |
On 2/14/22 11:07, Josef Johansson wrote: > From: Josef Johansson <josef@oderland.se> > > PCI/MSI: Correct use of can_mask in msi_add_msi_desc() > > Commit 71020a3c0dff4 ("PCI/MSI: Use msi_add_msi_desc()") modifies > the logic of checking msi_attrib.can_mask, without any reason. > > This commits restores that logic. > > Fixes: 71020a3c0dff4 ("PCI/MSI: Use msi_add_msi_desc()") > Signed-off-by: Josef Johansson <josef@oderland.se> > > --- > v2: Changing subject line to fit earlier commits. > > Trying to fix a NULL BUG in the NVMe MSIX implementation I stumbled upon this code, > which ironically was what my last MSI patch resulted into. > > I don't see any reason why this logic was change, and it did not break anything > correcting the logic. > > CC xen-devel since it very much relates to Xen kernel (via pci_msi_ignore_mask). > --- > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c > index c19c7ca58186..146e7b9a01cc 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c > @@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ static int msix_setup_msi_descs(struct pci_dev *dev, void __iomem *base, > desc.pci.msi_attrib.can_mask = !pci_msi_ignore_mask && > !desc.pci.msi_attrib.is_virtual; > > - if (!desc.pci.msi_attrib.can_mask) { > + if (desc.pci.msi_attrib.can_mask) { > addr = pci_msix_desc_addr(&desc); > desc.pci.msix_ctrl = readl(addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL); > } > > -- > 2.31.1 > Hi, I'm sending a ping such that this patch will not get forgotten in the oblivion. Regards Josef
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 12:03:15PM +0200, Josef Johansson wrote: > On 2/14/22 11:07, Josef Johansson wrote: > > From: Josef Johansson <josef@oderland.se> > > > > PCI/MSI: Correct use of can_mask in msi_add_msi_desc() > > Commit 71020a3c0dff4 ("PCI/MSI: Use msi_add_msi_desc()") modifies > > the logic of checking msi_attrib.can_mask, without any reason. > > This commits restores that logic. > > > > Fixes: 71020a3c0dff4 ("PCI/MSI: Use msi_add_msi_desc()") > > Signed-off-by: Josef Johansson <josef@oderland.se> > > > > --- > > v2: Changing subject line to fit earlier commits. > > > > Trying to fix a NULL BUG in the NVMe MSIX implementation I stumbled upon this code, > > which ironically was what my last MSI patch resulted into. > > > > I don't see any reason why this logic was change, and it did not break anything > > correcting the logic. > > > > CC xen-devel since it very much relates to Xen kernel (via pci_msi_ignore_mask). > > --- > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c > > index c19c7ca58186..146e7b9a01cc 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c > > @@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ static int msix_setup_msi_descs(struct pci_dev *dev, void __iomem *base, > > desc.pci.msi_attrib.can_mask = !pci_msi_ignore_mask && > > !desc.pci.msi_attrib.is_virtual; > > - if (!desc.pci.msi_attrib.can_mask) { > > + if (desc.pci.msi_attrib.can_mask) { > > addr = pci_msix_desc_addr(&desc); > > desc.pci.msix_ctrl = readl(addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL); > > } > > Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Bjorn, please take it? Jason
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 09:10:41AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 12:03:15PM +0200, Josef Johansson wrote: > > On 2/14/22 11:07, Josef Johansson wrote: > > > From: Josef Johansson <josef@oderland.se> > > > > > > PCI/MSI: Correct use of can_mask in msi_add_msi_desc() > > > Commit 71020a3c0dff4 ("PCI/MSI: Use msi_add_msi_desc()") modifies > > > the logic of checking msi_attrib.can_mask, without any reason. > > > This commits restores that logic. > > > > > > Fixes: 71020a3c0dff4 ("PCI/MSI: Use msi_add_msi_desc()") > > > Signed-off-by: Josef Johansson <josef@oderland.se> > > > > > > --- > > > v2: Changing subject line to fit earlier commits. > > > > > > Trying to fix a NULL BUG in the NVMe MSIX implementation I stumbled upon this code, > > > which ironically was what my last MSI patch resulted into. > > > > > > I don't see any reason why this logic was change, and it did not break anything > > > correcting the logic. > > > > > > CC xen-devel since it very much relates to Xen kernel (via pci_msi_ignore_mask). > > > --- > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c > > > index c19c7ca58186..146e7b9a01cc 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c > > > @@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ static int msix_setup_msi_descs(struct pci_dev *dev, void __iomem *base, > > > desc.pci.msi_attrib.can_mask = !pci_msi_ignore_mask && > > > !desc.pci.msi_attrib.is_virtual; > > > - if (!desc.pci.msi_attrib.can_mask) { > > > + if (desc.pci.msi_attrib.can_mask) { > > > addr = pci_msix_desc_addr(&desc); > > > desc.pci.msix_ctrl = readl(addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL); > > > } > > > > > Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> > > Bjorn, please take it? Thanks for the ping. Since 71020a3c0dff4 is by Thomas, and he merged that along with a whole series of MSI work, I think I probably expected him to take care of this. This looks like a simple typo, so I think the commit log should be reworded along that line, e.g., something like: 71020a3c0dff4 ("PCI/MSI: Use msi_add_msi_desc()") inadvertently reversed the sense of "msi_attrib.can_mask" in one use: - if (entry->pci.msi_attrib.can_mask) { - addr = pci_msix_desc_addr(entry); - entry->pci.msix_ctrl = readl(addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL); + if (!desc.pci.msi_attrib.can_mask) { + addr = pci_msix_desc_addr(&desc); + desc.pci.msix_ctrl = readl(addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL); Restore the original test. Thomas, do you want to take this? I'm happy to merge it, but would like your reviewed-by or ack first. Bjorn
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 10:53:36AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 09:10:41AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 12:03:15PM +0200, Josef Johansson wrote: > > > On 2/14/22 11:07, Josef Johansson wrote: > > > > From: Josef Johansson <josef@oderland.se> > > > > > > > > PCI/MSI: Correct use of can_mask in msi_add_msi_desc() > > > > Commit 71020a3c0dff4 ("PCI/MSI: Use msi_add_msi_desc()") modifies > > > > the logic of checking msi_attrib.can_mask, without any reason. > > > > This commits restores that logic. > > > > > > > > Fixes: 71020a3c0dff4 ("PCI/MSI: Use msi_add_msi_desc()") > > > > Signed-off-by: Josef Johansson <josef@oderland.se> > > > > > > > > --- > > > > v2: Changing subject line to fit earlier commits. > > > > > > > > Trying to fix a NULL BUG in the NVMe MSIX implementation I stumbled upon this code, > > > > which ironically was what my last MSI patch resulted into. > > > > > > > > I don't see any reason why this logic was change, and it did not break anything > > > > correcting the logic. > > > > > > > > CC xen-devel since it very much relates to Xen kernel (via pci_msi_ignore_mask). > > > > --- > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c > > > > index c19c7ca58186..146e7b9a01cc 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c > > > > @@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ static int msix_setup_msi_descs(struct pci_dev *dev, void __iomem *base, > > > > desc.pci.msi_attrib.can_mask = !pci_msi_ignore_mask && > > > > !desc.pci.msi_attrib.is_virtual; > > > > - if (!desc.pci.msi_attrib.can_mask) { > > > > + if (desc.pci.msi_attrib.can_mask) { > > > > addr = pci_msix_desc_addr(&desc); > > > > desc.pci.msix_ctrl = readl(addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL); > > > > } > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> > > > > Bjorn, please take it? > > Thanks for the ping. Since 71020a3c0dff4 is by Thomas, and he merged > that along with a whole series of MSI work, I think I probably > expected him to take care of this. > > This looks like a simple typo, so I think the commit log should be > reworded along that line, e.g., something like: > > 71020a3c0dff4 ("PCI/MSI: Use msi_add_msi_desc()") inadvertently > reversed the sense of "msi_attrib.can_mask" in one use: > > - if (entry->pci.msi_attrib.can_mask) { > - addr = pci_msix_desc_addr(entry); > - entry->pci.msix_ctrl = readl(addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL); > + if (!desc.pci.msi_attrib.can_mask) { > + addr = pci_msix_desc_addr(&desc); > + desc.pci.msix_ctrl = readl(addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL); > > Restore the original test. > > Thomas, do you want to take this? I'm happy to merge it, but would > like your reviewed-by or ack first. At this point I think you should take it Bjorn.. Jason
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 11:07:47AM +0100, Josef Johansson wrote: > From: Josef Johansson <josef@oderland.se> > > PCI/MSI: Correct use of can_mask in msi_add_msi_desc() > > Commit 71020a3c0dff4 ("PCI/MSI: Use msi_add_msi_desc()") modifies > the logic of checking msi_attrib.can_mask, without any reason. > > This commits restores that logic. > > Fixes: 71020a3c0dff4 ("PCI/MSI: Use msi_add_msi_desc()") > Signed-off-by: Josef Johansson <josef@oderland.se> Applied to pci/misc for v6.1 with commit log below, thanks! PCI/MSI: Correct 'can_mask' test in msi_add_msi_desc() 71020a3c0dff4 ("PCI/MSI: Use msi_add_msi_desc()") inadvertently reversed the sense of "msi_attrib.can_mask" in one use: - if (entry->pci.msi_attrib.can_mask) { - addr = pci_msix_desc_addr(entry); - entry->pci.msix_ctrl = readl(addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL); + if (!desc.pci.msi_attrib.can_mask) { + addr = pci_msix_desc_addr(&desc); + desc.pci.msix_ctrl = readl(addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL); Restore the original test. > --- > v2: Changing subject line to fit earlier commits. > > Trying to fix a NULL BUG in the NVMe MSIX implementation I stumbled upon this code, > which ironically was what my last MSI patch resulted into. > > I don't see any reason why this logic was change, and it did not break anything > correcting the logic. > > CC xen-devel since it very much relates to Xen kernel (via pci_msi_ignore_mask). > --- > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c > index c19c7ca58186..146e7b9a01cc 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c > @@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ static int msix_setup_msi_descs(struct pci_dev *dev, void __iomem *base, > desc.pci.msi_attrib.can_mask = !pci_msi_ignore_mask && > !desc.pci.msi_attrib.is_virtual; > > - if (!desc.pci.msi_attrib.can_mask) { > + if (desc.pci.msi_attrib.can_mask) { > addr = pci_msix_desc_addr(&desc); > desc.pci.msix_ctrl = readl(addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL); > } > > -- > 2.31.1 > >
diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c index c19c7ca58186..146e7b9a01cc 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c +++ b/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c @@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ static int msix_setup_msi_descs(struct pci_dev *dev, void __iomem *base, desc.pci.msi_attrib.can_mask = !pci_msi_ignore_mask && !desc.pci.msi_attrib.is_virtual; - if (!desc.pci.msi_attrib.can_mask) { + if (desc.pci.msi_attrib.can_mask) { addr = pci_msix_desc_addr(&desc); desc.pci.msix_ctrl = readl(addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL); }