| Message ID | 1588071823-40200-1-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | RDMA/hns: Optimize PBL buffer allocation process | expand |
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 07:03:38PM +0800, Weihang Li wrote: > Patch #1 and #2 aim to use MTR interfaces for PBL buffer instead of MTT, > and after this, MTT can be removed completely. Patch #3 and #5 refactor > buffer size calculation process for WQE and SRQ. #4 can be considered as a > preparation for #5, which just moves code of SRQ together to a more > suitable place. > > This series looks huge, but most of the modification is to replace and > remove old interfaces, and patch #4 also contribute a lot. Actually, the > original logic is not changed so much. > > Changes since v3: > - Fix a sparce warning about a function that should be static reported by > kbuild test robot. > > Changes since v2: > - Just do a rebase to current for-next branch. > > Changes since v1: > - Remove meaningless judgment of count in some inline functions in #3. > - Add more information into commit messages of #3 and #5. > > Xi Wang (4): > RDMA/hns: Optimize PBL buffer allocation process > RDMA/hns: Remove unused MTT functions > RDMA/hns: Optimize WQE buffer size calculating process > RDMA/hns: Optimize SRQ buffer size calculating process > > Yixian Liu (1): > RDMA/hns: Move SRQ code to the reasonable place > > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_alloc.c | 43 - > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h | 110 +-- > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hem.c | 105 --- > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hem.h | 6 - > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.c | 45 +- > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c | 943 ++++++++++---------- > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c | 70 +- > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_mr.c | 1247 +++------------------------ > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_qp.c | 313 +++---- > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_srq.c | 16 +- > 10 files changed, 767 insertions(+), 2131 deletions(-) Good diffstat there.. Applied to for-next Thanks, Jason