Message ID | 20230510035415.16956-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Documentation fixes for Mellanox mlx5 devlink info | expand |
On 5/10/23 10:54, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > Here are fixes for mlx5 devlink info documentation. The first fixes > htmldocs warnings on the mainline, while the rest is formatting fixes. > > Changes since v1 [1]: > > * Pick up Reviewed-by tags from Leon Romanovsky > * Rebase on current net tree > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20230503094248.28931-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com/ > > Bagas Sanjaya (4): > Documentation: net/mlx5: Wrap vnic reporter devlink commands in code > blocks > Documentation: net/mlx5: Use bullet and definition lists for vnic > counters description > Documentation: net/mlx5: Add blank line separator before numbered > lists > Documentation: net/mlx5: Wrap notes in admonition blocks > > .../ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/devlink.rst | 60 ++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > Hi jon, If there is no response from mellanox and/or netdev maintainers, would you like to review and pick this series up? Thanks.
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> writes: > On 5/10/23 10:54, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: >> Here are fixes for mlx5 devlink info documentation. The first fixes >> htmldocs warnings on the mainline, while the rest is formatting fixes. >> >> Changes since v1 [1]: >> >> * Pick up Reviewed-by tags from Leon Romanovsky >> * Rebase on current net tree >> >> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20230503094248.28931-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com/ >> >> Bagas Sanjaya (4): >> Documentation: net/mlx5: Wrap vnic reporter devlink commands in code >> blocks >> Documentation: net/mlx5: Use bullet and definition lists for vnic >> counters description >> Documentation: net/mlx5: Add blank line separator before numbered >> lists >> Documentation: net/mlx5: Wrap notes in admonition blocks >> >> .../ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/devlink.rst | 60 ++++++++++++------- >> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) >> > > Hi jon, > > If there is no response from mellanox and/or netdev maintainers, > would you like to review and pick this series up? > They seem OK other than the gratuitous use of Fixes tags. The netdev maintainers are generally responsive and on top of things, though, and I don't think there would be any justification for bypassing them here. Thanks, jon
On Tue, 16 May 2023 12:29:18 -0600 Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > If there is no response from mellanox and/or netdev maintainers, > > would you like to review and pick this series up? > > They seem OK other than the gratuitous use of Fixes tags. The netdev > maintainers are generally responsive and on top of things, though, and I > don't think there would be any justification for bypassing them here. I'm expecting Saeed to pick them up to the mlx5 tree. Either that or tell us to take them in. I think he was out and traveling recently. Let's give him some time :|