mbox series

[v2,net-next,0/3] net/smc: Optimizing performance in

Message ID cover.1643380219.git.alibuda@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series net/smc: Optimizing performance in | expand

Message

D. Wythe Jan. 28, 2022, 2:44 p.m. UTC
From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>

This patch set aims to optimizing performance of SMC in short-lived
links scenarios, which is quite unsatisfactory right now.

In our benchmark, we test it with follow scripts:

./wrk -c 10000 -t 4 -H 'Connection: Close' -d 20 http://smc-server

Current performance figures like that:

Running 20s test @ http://11.213.45.6
  4 threads and 10000 connections
  4956 requests in 20.06s, 3.24MB read
  Socket errors: connect 0, read 0, write 672, timeout 0
Requests/sec:    247.07
Transfer/sec:    165.28KB

There are many reasons for this phenomenon, this patch set doesn't
solve it all though, but it can be well alleviated with it in.

Patch 1/3  (Make smc_tcp_listen_work() independent) :

Separate smc_tcp_listen_work() from smc_listen_work(), make them
independent of each other, the busy SMC handshake can not affect new TCP
connections visit any more. Avoid discarding a large number of TCP
connections after being overstock, which is undoubtedly raise the
connection establishment time.

Patch 2/3 (Limits SMC backlog connections):

Since patch 1 has separated smc_tcp_listen_work() from
smc_listen_work(), an unrestricted TCP accept have come into being. This
patch try to put a limit on SMC backlog connections refers to
implementation of TCP.

Patch 3/3 (Fallback when SMC handshake workqueue congested):

Considering the complexity of SMC handshake right now, in short-lived
links scenarios, this may not be the main scenario of SMC though, it's
performance is still quite poor. This Patch try to provide auto fallback
case when SMC handshake workqueue congested, which is the sign of SMC
handshake stacking in our opinion.

Of course, it's optional.

After this patch set, performance figures like that:

Running 20s test @ http://11.213.45.6
  4 threads and 10000 connections
  693253 requests in 20.10s, 452.88MB read
Requests/sec:  34488.13
Transfer/sec:     22.53MB

That's a quite well performance improvement, about to 6 to 7 times in my
environment.

---
changelog:
v2: fix compile warning and invalid dependencies for kconfig
---
D. Wythe (3):
  net/smc: Make smc_tcp_listen_work() independent
  net/smc: Limits backlog connections
  net/smc: Fallback when handshake workqueue congested

 include/linux/tcp.h  |  1 +
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c |  3 +-
 net/smc/Kconfig      | 12 ++++++++
 net/smc/af_smc.c     | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 net/smc/smc.h        |  5 ++++
 5 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Karsten Graul Jan. 31, 2022, 12:46 p.m. UTC | #1
On 28/01/2022 15:44, D. Wythe wrote:
> From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
> 

Cover letter subject: "Optimizing performance in" ??
D. Wythe Feb. 2, 2022, 1 p.m. UTC | #2
Optimizing performance in short-lived links scenarios...

Sorry for that, it was cut off automatically. I don't know how to keep 
it as it was. Could you give me any any suggestions?

Thanks.

在 2022/1/31 下午8:46, Karsten Graul 写道:
> On 28/01/2022 15:44, D. Wythe wrote:
>> From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
>>
> 
> Cover letter subject: "Optimizing performance in" ??