@@ -434,6 +434,10 @@ static int fill_ud_av(struct hns_roce_v2_ud_send_wqe *ud_sq_wqe,
ah->av.tclass >> DSCP_SHIFT);
roce_set_field(ud_sq_wqe->byte_40, V2_UD_SEND_WQE_BYTE_40_FLOW_LABEL_M,
V2_UD_SEND_WQE_BYTE_40_FLOW_LABEL_S, ah->av.flowlabel);
+
+ if (WARN_ON(ah->av.sl > MAX_SERVICE_LEVEL))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
roce_set_field(ud_sq_wqe->byte_40, V2_UD_SEND_WQE_BYTE_40_SL_M,
V2_UD_SEND_WQE_BYTE_40_SL_S, ah->av.sl);
@@ -4610,12 +4614,8 @@ static int hns_roce_v2_set_path(struct ib_qp *ibqp,
memset(qpc_mask->dgid, 0, sizeof(grh->dgid.raw));
hr_qp->sl = rdma_ah_get_sl(&attr->ah_attr);
- if (unlikely(hr_qp->sl > MAX_SERVICE_LEVEL)) {
- ibdev_err(ibdev,
- "failed to fill QPC, sl (%d) shouldn't be larger than %d.\n",
- hr_qp->sl, MAX_SERVICE_LEVEL);
+ if (WARN_ON(hr_qp->sl > MAX_SERVICE_LEVEL))
return -EINVAL;
- }
roce_set_field(context->byte_28_at_fl, V2_QPC_BYTE_28_SL_M,
V2_QPC_BYTE_28_SL_S, hr_qp->sl);
According to the RoCE v1 specification, the sl (service level) 0-7 are mapped directly to priorities 0-7 respectively, sl 8-15 are reserved. The driver should verify whether the value of sl is larger than 7, if so, an exception should be returned. Fixes: 172505cfa3a8 ("RDMA/hns: Add check for the validity of sl configuration") Fixes: d6a3627e311c ("RDMA/hns: Optimize wqe buffer set flow for post send") Signed-off-by: Weihang Li <liweihang@huawei.com> --- drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)