Message ID | 168130336725.150247.12193228778654006957.stgit@firesoul (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | XDP-hints: API change for RX-hash kfunc bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash | expand |
On 04/12, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > Add counters for skipped, failed and redirected packets. > The xdp_hw_metadata program only redirects UDP port 9091. > This helps users to quickly identify then packets are > skipped and identify failures of bpf_xdp_adjust_meta. > > Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> > --- > .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 4 +++- > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c > index b0104763405a..a07ef7534013 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c > @@ -25,6 +25,10 @@ struct { > __type(value, __u32); > } xsk SEC(".maps"); > > +volatile __u64 pkts_skip = 0; > +volatile __u64 pkts_fail = 0; > +volatile __u64 pkts_redir = 0; > + > extern int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp(const struct xdp_md *ctx, > __u64 *timestamp) __ksym; > extern int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(const struct xdp_md *ctx, > @@ -59,16 +63,21 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx) > udp = NULL; > } > > - if (!udp) > + if (!udp) { > + pkts_skip++; > return XDP_PASS; > + } > > /* Forwarding UDP:9091 to AF_XDP */ > - if (udp->dest != bpf_htons(9091)) > + if (udp->dest != bpf_htons(9091)) { > + pkts_skip++; > return XDP_PASS; > + } > > ret = bpf_xdp_adjust_meta(ctx, -(int)sizeof(struct xdp_meta)); > if (ret != 0) { [..] > bpf_printk("bpf_xdp_adjust_meta returned %d", ret); Maybe let's remove these completely? Merge patch 1 and 2, remove printk, add counters. We can add more counters in the future if the existing ones are not enough.. WDYT? > + pkts_fail++; > return XDP_PASS; > } > > @@ -78,6 +87,7 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx) > > if (meta + 1 > data) { > bpf_printk("bpf_xdp_adjust_meta doesn't appear to work"); > + pkts_fail++; > return XDP_PASS; > } > > @@ -91,6 +101,7 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx) > else > meta->rx_hash = 0; /* Used by AF_XDP as not avail signal */ > > + pkts_redir++; > return bpf_redirect_map(&xsk, ctx->rx_queue_index, XDP_PASS); > } > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c > index 1c8acb68b977..3b942ef7297b 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c > @@ -212,7 +212,9 @@ static int verify_metadata(struct xsk *rx_xsk, int rxq, int server_fd) > while (true) { > errno = 0; > ret = poll(fds, rxq + 1, 1000); > - printf("poll: %d (%d)\n", ret, errno); > + printf("poll: %d (%d) skip=%llu fail=%llu redir=%llu\n", > + ret, errno, bpf_obj->bss->pkts_skip, > + bpf_obj->bss->pkts_fail, bpf_obj->bss->pkts_redir); > if (ret < 0) > break; > if (ret == 0) > >
On 12/04/2023 18.56, Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > On 04/12, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: >> Add counters for skipped, failed and redirected packets. >> The xdp_hw_metadata program only redirects UDP port 9091. >> This helps users to quickly identify then packets are >> skipped and identify failures of bpf_xdp_adjust_meta. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> >> --- >> .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- >> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 4 +++- >> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c >> index b0104763405a..a07ef7534013 100644 >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c >> @@ -25,6 +25,10 @@ struct { >> __type(value, __u32); >> } xsk SEC(".maps"); >> >> +volatile __u64 pkts_skip = 0; >> +volatile __u64 pkts_fail = 0; >> +volatile __u64 pkts_redir = 0; >> + >> extern int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp(const struct xdp_md *ctx, >> __u64 *timestamp) __ksym; >> extern int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(const struct xdp_md *ctx, >> @@ -59,16 +63,21 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx) >> udp = NULL; >> } >> >> - if (!udp) >> + if (!udp) { >> + pkts_skip++; >> return XDP_PASS; >> + } >> >> /* Forwarding UDP:9091 to AF_XDP */ >> - if (udp->dest != bpf_htons(9091)) >> + if (udp->dest != bpf_htons(9091)) { >> + pkts_skip++; >> return XDP_PASS; >> + } >> >> ret = bpf_xdp_adjust_meta(ctx, -(int)sizeof(struct xdp_meta)); >> if (ret != 0) { > > [..] > >> bpf_printk("bpf_xdp_adjust_meta returned %d", ret); > > Maybe let's remove these completely? Merge patch 1 and 2, remove printk, > add counters. We can add more counters in the future if the existing > ones are not enough.. WDYT? > Sure, lets just remove all of the bpf_printk, and add these counter instead. Rolling V9. >> + pkts_fail++; This fail counter should be enough for driver devel to realize that they also need to implement/setup XDP metadata pointers correctly (for bpf_xdp_adjust_meta to work). >> return XDP_PASS; >> }
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 10:52 AM Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 12/04/2023 18.56, Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > > On 04/12, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > >> Add counters for skipped, failed and redirected packets. > >> The xdp_hw_metadata program only redirects UDP port 9091. > >> This helps users to quickly identify then packets are > >> skipped and identify failures of bpf_xdp_adjust_meta. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> > >> --- > >> .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- > >> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 4 +++- > >> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c > >> index b0104763405a..a07ef7534013 100644 > >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c > >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c > >> @@ -25,6 +25,10 @@ struct { > >> __type(value, __u32); > >> } xsk SEC(".maps"); > >> > >> +volatile __u64 pkts_skip = 0; > >> +volatile __u64 pkts_fail = 0; > >> +volatile __u64 pkts_redir = 0; > >> + > >> extern int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp(const struct xdp_md *ctx, > >> __u64 *timestamp) __ksym; > >> extern int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(const struct xdp_md *ctx, > >> @@ -59,16 +63,21 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx) > >> udp = NULL; > >> } > >> > >> - if (!udp) > >> + if (!udp) { > >> + pkts_skip++; > >> return XDP_PASS; > >> + } > >> > >> /* Forwarding UDP:9091 to AF_XDP */ > >> - if (udp->dest != bpf_htons(9091)) > >> + if (udp->dest != bpf_htons(9091)) { > >> + pkts_skip++; > >> return XDP_PASS; > >> + } > >> > >> ret = bpf_xdp_adjust_meta(ctx, -(int)sizeof(struct xdp_meta)); > >> if (ret != 0) { > > > > [..] > > > >> bpf_printk("bpf_xdp_adjust_meta returned %d", ret); > > > > Maybe let's remove these completely? Merge patch 1 and 2, remove printk, > > add counters. We can add more counters in the future if the existing > > ones are not enough.. WDYT? > > > > Sure, lets just remove all of the bpf_printk, and add these counter instead. > Rolling V9. > > >> + pkts_fail++; > > This fail counter should be enough for driver devel to realize that they > also need to implement/setup XDP metadata pointers correctly (for > bpf_xdp_adjust_meta to work). Agreed. As long as we have a clear signal "something's not working" (instead of failing silently), that should be enough to get to the bottom of it.. > >> return XDP_PASS; > >> } >
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c index b0104763405a..a07ef7534013 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c @@ -25,6 +25,10 @@ struct { __type(value, __u32); } xsk SEC(".maps"); +volatile __u64 pkts_skip = 0; +volatile __u64 pkts_fail = 0; +volatile __u64 pkts_redir = 0; + extern int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp(const struct xdp_md *ctx, __u64 *timestamp) __ksym; extern int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(const struct xdp_md *ctx, @@ -59,16 +63,21 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx) udp = NULL; } - if (!udp) + if (!udp) { + pkts_skip++; return XDP_PASS; + } /* Forwarding UDP:9091 to AF_XDP */ - if (udp->dest != bpf_htons(9091)) + if (udp->dest != bpf_htons(9091)) { + pkts_skip++; return XDP_PASS; + } ret = bpf_xdp_adjust_meta(ctx, -(int)sizeof(struct xdp_meta)); if (ret != 0) { bpf_printk("bpf_xdp_adjust_meta returned %d", ret); + pkts_fail++; return XDP_PASS; } @@ -78,6 +87,7 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx) if (meta + 1 > data) { bpf_printk("bpf_xdp_adjust_meta doesn't appear to work"); + pkts_fail++; return XDP_PASS; } @@ -91,6 +101,7 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx) else meta->rx_hash = 0; /* Used by AF_XDP as not avail signal */ + pkts_redir++; return bpf_redirect_map(&xsk, ctx->rx_queue_index, XDP_PASS); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c index 1c8acb68b977..3b942ef7297b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c @@ -212,7 +212,9 @@ static int verify_metadata(struct xsk *rx_xsk, int rxq, int server_fd) while (true) { errno = 0; ret = poll(fds, rxq + 1, 1000); - printf("poll: %d (%d)\n", ret, errno); + printf("poll: %d (%d) skip=%llu fail=%llu redir=%llu\n", + ret, errno, bpf_obj->bss->pkts_skip, + bpf_obj->bss->pkts_fail, bpf_obj->bss->pkts_redir); if (ret < 0) break; if (ret == 0)
Add counters for skipped, failed and redirected packets. The xdp_hw_metadata program only redirects UDP port 9091. This helps users to quickly identify then packets are skipped and identify failures of bpf_xdp_adjust_meta. Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> --- .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)