diff mbox series

[V2,net] net: mana: Fix error handling in mana_create_txq/rxq's NAPI cleanup

Message ID 1724406269-10868-1-git-send-email-schakrabarti@linux.microsoft.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series [V2,net] net: mana: Fix error handling in mana_create_txq/rxq's NAPI cleanup | expand

Commit Message

Souradeep Chakrabarti Aug. 23, 2024, 9:44 a.m. UTC
Currently napi_disable() gets called during rxq and txq cleanup,
even before napi is enabled and hrtimer is initialized. It causes
kernel panic.

? page_fault_oops+0x136/0x2b0
  ? page_counter_cancel+0x2e/0x80
  ? do_user_addr_fault+0x2f2/0x640
  ? refill_obj_stock+0xc4/0x110
  ? exc_page_fault+0x71/0x160
  ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30
  ? __mmdrop+0x10/0x180
  ? __mmdrop+0xec/0x180
  ? hrtimer_active+0xd/0x50
  hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x2c/0xf0
  hrtimer_cancel+0x15/0x30
  napi_disable+0x65/0x90
  mana_destroy_rxq+0x4c/0x2f0
  mana_create_rxq.isra.0+0x56c/0x6d0
  ? mana_uncfg_vport+0x50/0x50
  mana_alloc_queues+0x21b/0x320
  ? skb_dequeue+0x5f/0x80

Fixes: e1b5683ff62e ("net: mana: Move NAPI from EQ to CQ")
Signed-off-by: Souradeep Chakrabarti <schakrabarti@linux.microsoft.com>
---
V2 -> V1:
Addressed the comment on cleaning up napi for the queues,
where queue creation was successful.
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c | 22 +++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Comments

Haiyang Zhang Aug. 23, 2024, 9:12 p.m. UTC | #1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Souradeep Chakrabarti <schakrabarti@linux.microsoft.com>
> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2024 5:44 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>; Haiyang Zhang
> <haiyangz@microsoft.com>; wei.liu@kernel.org; Dexuan Cui
> <decui@microsoft.com>; davem@davemloft.net; edumazet@google.com;
> kuba@kernel.org; pabeni@redhat.com; Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>;
> yury.norov@gmail.com; leon@kernel.org; cai.huoqing@linux.dev;
> ssengar@linux.microsoft.com; vkuznets@redhat.com; tglx@linutronix.de;
> linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Souradeep Chakrabarti <schakrabarti@microsoft.com>; Souradeep
> Chakrabarti <schakrabarti@linux.microsoft.com>
> Subject: [PATCH V2 net] net: mana: Fix error handling in
> mana_create_txq/rxq's NAPI cleanup
> 
> Currently napi_disable() gets called during rxq and txq cleanup,
> even before napi is enabled and hrtimer is initialized. It causes
> kernel panic.
> 
> ? page_fault_oops+0x136/0x2b0
>   ? page_counter_cancel+0x2e/0x80
>   ? do_user_addr_fault+0x2f2/0x640
>   ? refill_obj_stock+0xc4/0x110
>   ? exc_page_fault+0x71/0x160
>   ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30
>   ? __mmdrop+0x10/0x180
>   ? __mmdrop+0xec/0x180
>   ? hrtimer_active+0xd/0x50
>   hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x2c/0xf0
>   hrtimer_cancel+0x15/0x30
>   napi_disable+0x65/0x90
>   mana_destroy_rxq+0x4c/0x2f0
>   mana_create_rxq.isra.0+0x56c/0x6d0
>   ? mana_uncfg_vport+0x50/0x50
>   mana_alloc_queues+0x21b/0x320
>   ? skb_dequeue+0x5f/0x80
> 
> Fixes: e1b5683ff62e ("net: mana: Move NAPI from EQ to CQ")
> Signed-off-by: Souradeep Chakrabarti <schakrabarti@linux.microsoft.com>

Reviewed-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>

Please add:
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

Thanks.
Shradha Gupta Aug. 24, 2024, 3:52 a.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 02:44:29AM -0700, Souradeep Chakrabarti wrote:
> Currently napi_disable() gets called during rxq and txq cleanup,
> even before napi is enabled and hrtimer is initialized. It causes
> kernel panic.
> 
> ? page_fault_oops+0x136/0x2b0
>   ? page_counter_cancel+0x2e/0x80
>   ? do_user_addr_fault+0x2f2/0x640
>   ? refill_obj_stock+0xc4/0x110
>   ? exc_page_fault+0x71/0x160
>   ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30
>   ? __mmdrop+0x10/0x180
>   ? __mmdrop+0xec/0x180
>   ? hrtimer_active+0xd/0x50
>   hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x2c/0xf0
>   hrtimer_cancel+0x15/0x30
>   napi_disable+0x65/0x90
>   mana_destroy_rxq+0x4c/0x2f0
>   mana_create_rxq.isra.0+0x56c/0x6d0
>   ? mana_uncfg_vport+0x50/0x50
>   mana_alloc_queues+0x21b/0x320
>   ? skb_dequeue+0x5f/0x80
> 
> Fixes: e1b5683ff62e ("net: mana: Move NAPI from EQ to CQ")
> Signed-off-by: Souradeep Chakrabarti <schakrabarti@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
> V2 -> V1:
> Addressed the comment on cleaning up napi for the queues,
> where queue creation was successful.
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c | 22 +++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
> index 39f56973746d..7448085fd49e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
> @@ -1872,10 +1872,11 @@ static void mana_destroy_txq(struct mana_port_context *apc)
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < apc->num_queues; i++) {
>  		napi = &apc->tx_qp[i].tx_cq.napi;
> -		napi_synchronize(napi);
> -		napi_disable(napi);
> -		netif_napi_del(napi);
> -
> +		if (napi->dev == apc->ndev) {
> +			napi_synchronize(napi);
> +			napi_disable(napi);
> +			netif_napi_del(napi);
> +		}
>  		mana_destroy_wq_obj(apc, GDMA_SQ, apc->tx_qp[i].tx_object);
>  
>  		mana_deinit_cq(apc, &apc->tx_qp[i].tx_cq);
> @@ -2023,14 +2024,17 @@ static void mana_destroy_rxq(struct mana_port_context *apc,
>  
>  	napi = &rxq->rx_cq.napi;
>  
> -	if (validate_state)
> -		napi_synchronize(napi);
> +	if (napi->dev == apc->ndev) {
>  
> -	napi_disable(napi);
> +		if (validate_state)
> +			napi_synchronize(napi);
>  
> -	xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rxq->xdp_rxq);
> +		napi_disable(napi);
>  
> -	netif_napi_del(napi);
> +		netif_napi_del(napi);
> +	}
> +
> +	xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rxq->xdp_rxq);
>  
>  	mana_destroy_wq_obj(apc, GDMA_RQ, rxq->rxobj);

Reviewed-by: Shradha Gupta <shradhagupta@linux.microsoft.com>
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
>
Jakub Kicinski Aug. 27, 2024, 8:26 p.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 02:44:29 -0700 Souradeep Chakrabarti wrote:
> @@ -2023,14 +2024,17 @@ static void mana_destroy_rxq(struct mana_port_context *apc,
>  
>  	napi = &rxq->rx_cq.napi;
>  
> -	if (validate_state)
> -		napi_synchronize(napi);
> +	if (napi->dev == apc->ndev) {
>  
> -	napi_disable(napi);
> +		if (validate_state)
> +			napi_synchronize(napi);
>  
> -	xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rxq->xdp_rxq);
> +		napi_disable(napi);
>  
> -	netif_napi_del(napi);
> +		netif_napi_del(napi);
> +	}
> +
> +	xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rxq->xdp_rxq);

Please don't use internal core state as a crutch for your cleanup.

IDK what "validate_state" stands for, but it gives you all the info you
need on Rx. On Rx NAPI registration happens as the last stage of rxq
activation, once nothing can fail. And the "cleanup" path calls destroy
with validate_state=false. The only other caller passes true.

So you can rewrite this as:

	if (validate_state) { /* rename it maybe? */
		napi_disable(napi);
		...
	}
	xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rxq->xdp_rxq);

You can take similar approach with Tx. Pass a bool which tells the
destroy function whether NAPI has been registered.
Souradeep Chakrabarti Aug. 29, 2024, 8:43 a.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 01:26:37PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 02:44:29 -0700 Souradeep Chakrabarti wrote:
> > @@ -2023,14 +2024,17 @@ static void mana_destroy_rxq(struct mana_port_context *apc,
> >  
> >  	napi = &rxq->rx_cq.napi;
> >  
> > -	if (validate_state)
> > -		napi_synchronize(napi);
> > +	if (napi->dev == apc->ndev) {
> >  
> > -	napi_disable(napi);
> > +		if (validate_state)
> > +			napi_synchronize(napi);
> >  
> > -	xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rxq->xdp_rxq);
> > +		napi_disable(napi);
> >  
> > -	netif_napi_del(napi);
> > +		netif_napi_del(napi);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rxq->xdp_rxq);
> 
> Please don't use internal core state as a crutch for your cleanup.
> 
> IDK what "validate_state" stands for, but it gives you all the info you
> need on Rx. On Rx NAPI registration happens as the last stage of rxq
> activation, once nothing can fail. And the "cleanup" path calls destroy
> with validate_state=false. The only other caller passes true.
> 
> So you can rewrite this as:
> 
> 	if (validate_state) { /* rename it maybe? */
> 		napi_disable(napi);
> 		...
> 	}
> 	xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rxq->xdp_rxq);
> 
> You can take similar approach with Tx. Pass a bool which tells the
> destroy function whether NAPI has been registered.
Thanks Jakub for the suggestion. I have changed the implementation
in the V3. I have added a new txq and rxq structure attribute to check
that per queue napi is initialized.
The use of a local flag like validate_state will not be possible with
current design of txq destroy function, as it uses the hole vport
and loops for all the queues for that port.
-
Souradeep
> -- 
> pw-bot: cr
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
index 39f56973746d..7448085fd49e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
@@ -1872,10 +1872,11 @@  static void mana_destroy_txq(struct mana_port_context *apc)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < apc->num_queues; i++) {
 		napi = &apc->tx_qp[i].tx_cq.napi;
-		napi_synchronize(napi);
-		napi_disable(napi);
-		netif_napi_del(napi);
-
+		if (napi->dev == apc->ndev) {
+			napi_synchronize(napi);
+			napi_disable(napi);
+			netif_napi_del(napi);
+		}
 		mana_destroy_wq_obj(apc, GDMA_SQ, apc->tx_qp[i].tx_object);
 
 		mana_deinit_cq(apc, &apc->tx_qp[i].tx_cq);
@@ -2023,14 +2024,17 @@  static void mana_destroy_rxq(struct mana_port_context *apc,
 
 	napi = &rxq->rx_cq.napi;
 
-	if (validate_state)
-		napi_synchronize(napi);
+	if (napi->dev == apc->ndev) {
 
-	napi_disable(napi);
+		if (validate_state)
+			napi_synchronize(napi);
 
-	xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rxq->xdp_rxq);
+		napi_disable(napi);
 
-	netif_napi_del(napi);
+		netif_napi_del(napi);
+	}
+
+	xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rxq->xdp_rxq);
 
 	mana_destroy_wq_obj(apc, GDMA_RQ, rxq->rxobj);