| Message ID | 20130318202526.GA11268@longonot.mountain (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted, archived |
| Headers | show |
> Subject: [patch v2] IB/ipath: silence a static checker warning Thanks for the patch! Acked-by: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_verbs.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_verbs.c index 439c35d..ea93870 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_verbs.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_verbs.c @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ void ipath_ib_rcv(struct ipath_ibdev *dev, void *rhdr, void *data, goto bail; } - opcode = be32_to_cpu(ohdr->bth[0]) >> 24; + opcode = (be32_to_cpu(ohdr->bth[0]) >> 24) & 0x7f; dev->opstats[opcode].n_bytes += tlen; dev->opstats[opcode].n_packets++;
I have a static checker which complains that 0x255 is too high for the "dev->opstats[opcode]" array. It turns out that the hardware has already validated the opcode at this point so it can't actually overflow. However, silencing the warning is good and this matches how the opcode is treated in qib_ib_rcv() as well. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> --- v2: new changelog. Just mask the value instead of adding an if statement. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html