Message ID | 20190123225025.32052-1-palmer@sifive.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <linux-riscv-bounces+patchwork-linux-riscv=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org> Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABBB2913 for <patchwork-linux-riscv@patchwork.kernel.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 22:50:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E862C766 for <patchwork-linux-riscv@patchwork.kernel.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 22:50:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 88BC82D79A; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 22:50:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E3662C766 for <patchwork-linux-riscv@patchwork.kernel.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 22:50:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:List-Subscribe:List-Help: List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:From:Message-Id:Date: Subject:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: List-Owner; bh=u4Q3hjrTrPNDpyfvgzEkfJqIyxsTbx1s5Or/LY3kn8o=; b=LvsDLHttecQnh+ e3aTJXZeIsEnnv4ER4i29I3mpb92XfM5PMKXRM01wy5obIFMcBWO5s63hC7Z07MizpiyBcjH9SMwa JuLkO4kLkuPjXk0yQfuYjH1UT+YNf/aFna6MV8k0ZQUZ33Pu8BGuxgqhOhbAzPdkpP7Vxx4gl+h5Y CB8ofqLZoogTt4rFAu35WdM7/kYm59jq5RZSvLLm2xJbcSS5EjIm8zrQR9deV7SJlwUmWFlPYgUld LVpI0JRg7lhKJGtAbuxF2iGH6bImOaouMPNNq3IOgh8557AmMsNhUZpatvnybeA+ZI4D+h7P0wI2z 3MUiX1cxhSQtRqxOPCmw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gmRLz-0003dl-A9; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 22:50:39 +0000 Received: from mail-pl1-x642.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::642]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gmRLw-0003cw-Gc for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 22:50:37 +0000 Received: by mail-pl1-x642.google.com with SMTP id u6so1894989plm.8 for <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 14:50:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sifive.com; s=google; h=subject:date:message-id:from:to; bh=LbaAnXHtFFrxwcbam+YMvIAcAk4A5ix2yDnMB5WvcMs=; b=M+KNKpcScL/K4latf5LI9BiHmKOe+o12jf8eMuhQBm/pVrM4mgd2qSTB484/MiwdV7 YtW0gV8mfIYrbGN7NRmsRB4mnHQ9ylGCfvyVU49cOeZQc527E4HIbLxhJcEIWtAkEJew mtsFIdAl7Rqo8f8W/tgHA5cnfwPRWbhYgBLBnw1f0BrhXlh2tdaT5b8fpIU3708rnVv6 6UeAE0eiqn7fXf55tpsZasVoNqxjHDFt2Acunn1hXTDDuWZzx8EYZvo4rBBkk0Mxp1Sg 4tN0UpkGMqCY2G7dQWszXRSYCvJHyTS8aMI588THfAGdhapbwMnvMhwqu2P0KJmpslb3 JKVQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:date:message-id:from:to; bh=LbaAnXHtFFrxwcbam+YMvIAcAk4A5ix2yDnMB5WvcMs=; b=svuNSsy9MFRedi0XGCr2mM1z8EPH5J3f7opVknzkUSATd/0yad8DZS/CaF4xbRLxdW OAd7dDuVBm1ZWBpl5S9oq66+fW6724yQPOcSTW8/ehhwNpA7kuaDBZsadth/p2+gmknQ SegqLXvt3X03jKRnQQxiAVTomXp0GXMEluqfrq4e8rIMx+CeCr7WxW3NbPcxtJuzfdTg g0a9M1Xt+Ahs+2DoDD86ivuuAcBwjLrxIkeBQLbl+MOjFuoyUCjDRCSkyi4Q+7M2rLp7 cRbRj+vUf2oGQK/v/pk8X1C6ihTRJQscMhizDYRJW6vy2AspvUNIPcAY/BMOzLU7exZ5 vNxQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukc8KnzGw5IiR74SFYq0KF0ZyOkSPYGnv/4WYrX7R2A+81qkNE2j lsPPn/ZSC8RJsEc9BRpdF1dxqKRHgxM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6i3KdqUMs4P4TllQytOgLYiiR43Ugh/GfgKQ5p38xADFBpDHL1WaEnRbhbJdG+bWM3Bg7abw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8a95:: with SMTP id p21mr4222211plo.183.1548283834880; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 14:50:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([12.206.222.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c4sm40461512pfm.151.2019.01.23.14.50.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Jan 2019 14:50:34 -0800 (PST) Subject: [PATCH 0/3] RISC-V: defconfig: Cleanups and Generic PCIe Support Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 14:50:22 -0800 Message-Id: <20190123225025.32052-1-palmer@sifive.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.18.1 From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com> To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@wdc.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190123_145036_583449_67767D7F X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 6.37 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: <linux-riscv.lists.infradead.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-riscv>, <mailto:linux-riscv-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/> List-Post: <mailto:linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org> List-Help: <mailto:linux-riscv-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv>, <mailto:linux-riscv-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" <linux-riscv-bounces@lists.infradead.org> Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+patchwork-linux-riscv=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP |
Series |
RISC-V: defconfig: Cleanups and Generic PCIe Support
|
expand
|
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 02:50:22PM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > This bounced around on the mailing list a handful of times. If there's > no opposition then I'll go ahead and put this in my next PR. I know the > split is a bit pedantic, but since everyone depends on defconfig I want > to be explicit about the changes. Looks good: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>