Message ID | 20200305050207.4159-1-luke.r.nels@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | eBPF JIT for RV32G | expand |
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 at 06:02, Luke Nelson <lukenels@cs.washington.edu> wrote: > > This series adds an eBPF JIT for 32-bit RISC-V (RV32G) to the kernel, > adapted from the RV64 JIT and the 32-bit ARM JIT. > Nice work! Thanks for hanging in there! For the series, Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
On 3/5/20 6:40 AM, Björn Töpel wrote: > On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 at 06:02, Luke Nelson <lukenels@cs.washington.edu> wrote: >> >> This series adds an eBPF JIT for 32-bit RISC-V (RV32G) to the kernel, >> adapted from the RV64 JIT and the 32-bit ARM JIT. >> > > Nice work! Thanks for hanging in there! > > For the series, > Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com> > Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com> Applied, thanks everyone! P.s.: I fixed the MAINTAINERS entry in the last one to have both netdev and bpf to be consistent with all the other JIT entries there.
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 04:19:27PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > On 3/5/20 6:40 AM, Björn Töpel wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 at 06:02, Luke Nelson <lukenels@cs.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > > > This series adds an eBPF JIT for 32-bit RISC-V (RV32G) to the kernel, > > > adapted from the RV64 JIT and the 32-bit ARM JIT. > > > > > > > Nice work! Thanks for hanging in there! > > > > For the series, > > Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com> > > Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com> > > Applied, thanks everyone! > P.s.: I fixed the MAINTAINERS entry in the last one to have both netdev and bpf > to be consistent with all the other JIT entries there. Does parse-maintainer.pl happy about your changes?
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 at 16:19, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote: > [...] > Applied, thanks everyone! > > P.s.: I fixed the MAINTAINERS entry in the last one to have both netdev and bpf > to be consistent with all the other JIT entries there. Ah, I asked specifically Xi and Luke to *remove* the netdev entry, due to the bpf_devel_QA.rst change. :-)
On 3/5/20 5:53 PM, Björn Töpel wrote: > On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 at 16:19, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote: >> > [...] >> Applied, thanks everyone! >> >> P.s.: I fixed the MAINTAINERS entry in the last one to have both netdev and bpf >> to be consistent with all the other JIT entries there. > > Ah, I asked specifically Xi and Luke to *remove* the netdev entry, due > to the bpf_devel_QA.rst change. :-) Ah right, although all the BPF entries in MAINTAINERS file have both lists mentioned today. I think it doesn't hurt to have potentially more eyes for reviews. Thanks, Daniel