Message ID | cover.1718268003.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add ACPI NUMA support for RISC-V | expand |
On 2024/6/13 16:54, Haibo Xu wrote: > This patch series enable RISC-V ACPI NUMA support which was based on > the recently approved ACPI ECR[1]. > > Patch 1/4 add RISC-V specific acpi_numa.c file to parse NUMA information > from SRAT and SLIT ACPI tables. > Patch 2/4 add the common SRAT RINTC affinity structure handler. > Patch 3/4 change the ACPI_NUMA to a hidden option since it would be selected > by default on all supported platform. > Patch 4/4 replace pr_info with pr_debug in arch_acpi_numa_init() to avoid > potential boot noise on ACPI platforms that are not NUMA. Looks good to me, Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 04:54:32PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote: > This patch series enable RISC-V ACPI NUMA support which was based on > the recently approved ACPI ECR[1]. > > Patch 1/4 add RISC-V specific acpi_numa.c file to parse NUMA information > from SRAT and SLIT ACPI tables. > Patch 2/4 add the common SRAT RINTC affinity structure handler. > Patch 3/4 change the ACPI_NUMA to a hidden option since it would be selected > by default on all supported platform. > Patch 4/4 replace pr_info with pr_debug in arch_acpi_numa_init() to avoid > potential boot noise on ACPI platforms that are not NUMA. > > Based-on: https://github.com/linux-riscv/linux-riscv/tree/for-next > > [1] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YTdDx2IPm5IeZjAW932EYU-tUtgS08tX/view?usp=sharing Hi Palmer, Can this series be taken for -next? Thanks, Sunil
Hello: This series was applied to riscv/linux.git (for-next) by Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>: On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 16:54:32 +0800 you wrote: > This patch series enable RISC-V ACPI NUMA support which was based on > the recently approved ACPI ECR[1]. > > Patch 1/4 add RISC-V specific acpi_numa.c file to parse NUMA information > from SRAT and SLIT ACPI tables. > Patch 2/4 add the common SRAT RINTC affinity structure handler. > Patch 3/4 change the ACPI_NUMA to a hidden option since it would be selected > by default on all supported platform. > Patch 4/4 replace pr_info with pr_debug in arch_acpi_numa_init() to avoid > potential boot noise on ACPI platforms that are not NUMA. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [v4,1/4] ACPI: RISCV: Add NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/eabd9db64ea8 - [v4,2/4] ACPI: NUMA: Add handler for SRAT RINTC affinity structure https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/39494aec8a04 - [v4,3/4] ACPI: NUMA: change the ACPI_NUMA to a hidden option https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/adc3e82d2537 - [v4,4/4] ACPI: NUMA: replace pr_info with pr_debug in arch_acpi_numa_init https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/5f76d4211ee4 You are awesome, thank you!
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 01:54:32 PDT (-0700), haibo1.xu@intel.com wrote: > This patch series enable RISC-V ACPI NUMA support which was based on > the recently approved ACPI ECR[1]. > > Patch 1/4 add RISC-V specific acpi_numa.c file to parse NUMA information > from SRAT and SLIT ACPI tables. > Patch 2/4 add the common SRAT RINTC affinity structure handler. > Patch 3/4 change the ACPI_NUMA to a hidden option since it would be selected > by default on all supported platform. > Patch 4/4 replace pr_info with pr_debug in arch_acpi_numa_init() to avoid > potential boot noise on ACPI platforms that are not NUMA. > > Based-on: https://github.com/linux-riscv/linux-riscv/tree/for-next No big deal, but that's not actually my repo. Looks like it's just mirroring something, I use the kernel.org git stuff these days. I dropped it from the cover letter for the merge, it's not super useful anyway because it's a branch so nobody will know what it means later. Aside from that things look good, I've got this queued up for the tester. > > [1] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YTdDx2IPm5IeZjAW932EYU-tUtgS08tX/view?usp=sharing > > Testing: > Since the ACPI AIA/PLIC support patch set is still under upstream review, > hence it is tested using the poll based HVC SBI console and RAM disk. > 1) Build latest Qemu with the following patch backported > https://github.com/vlsunil/qemu/commit/42bd4eeefd5d4410a68f02d54fee406d8a1269b0 > > 2) Build latest EDK-II > https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/OvmfPkg/RiscVVirt/README.md > > 3) Build Linux with the following configs enabled > CONFIG_RISCV_SBI_V01=y > CONFIG_SERIAL_EARLYCON_RISCV_SBI=y > CONFIG_NONPORTABLE=y > CONFIG_HVC_RISCV_SBI=y > CONFIG_NUMA=y > CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA=y > > 4) Build buildroot rootfs.cpio > > 5) Launch the Qemu machine > qemu-system-riscv64 -nographic \ > -machine virt,pflash0=pflash0,pflash1=pflash1 -smp 4 -m 8G \ > -blockdev node-name=pflash0,driver=file,read-only=on,filename=RISCV_VIRT_CODE.fd \ > -blockdev node-name=pflash1,driver=file,filename=RISCV_VIRT_VARS.fd \ > -object memory-backend-ram,size=4G,id=m0 \ > -object memory-backend-ram,size=4G,id=m1 \ > -numa node,memdev=m0,cpus=0-1,nodeid=0 \ > -numa node,memdev=m1,cpus=2-3,nodeid=1 \ > -numa dist,src=0,dst=1,val=30 \ > -kernel linux/arch/riscv/boot/Image \ > -initrd buildroot/output/images/rootfs.cpio \ > -append "root=/dev/ram ro console=hvc0 earlycon=sbi" > > [ 0.000000] ACPI: SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 [mem 0x80000000-0x17fffffff] > [ 0.000000] ACPI: SRAT: Node 1 PXM 1 [mem 0x180000000-0x27fffffff] > [ 0.000000] NUMA: NODE_DATA [mem 0x17fe3bc40-0x17fe3cfff] > [ 0.000000] NUMA: NODE_DATA [mem 0x27fff4c40-0x27fff5fff] > ... > [ 0.000000] ACPI: NUMA: SRAT: PXM 0 -> HARTID 0x0 -> Node 0 > [ 0.000000] ACPI: NUMA: SRAT: PXM 0 -> HARTID 0x1 -> Node 0 > [ 0.000000] ACPI: NUMA: SRAT: PXM 1 -> HARTID 0x2 -> Node 1 > [ 0.000000] ACPI: NUMA: SRAT: PXM 1 -> HARTID 0x3 -> Node 1 > > --- > Changes since v3 > - Rebase to linux-riscv/for-next(Linux 6.10-rc1) > - Remove original patch 1/6 since it had been merged through > ACPICA pull(commit fe1c408d50604f) > - Remove original patch 4/6 since the related changes was > introduced in commit 3a785e19f43267 > > Haibo Xu (4): > ACPI: RISCV: Add NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT > ACPI: NUMA: Add handler for SRAT RINTC affinity structure > ACPI: NUMA: change the ACPI_NUMA to a hidden option > ACPI: NUMA: replace pr_info with pr_debug in arch_acpi_numa_init > > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 - > arch/loongarch/Kconfig | 1 - > arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h | 15 +++- > arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile | 1 + > arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c | 5 -- > arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 4 +- > arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 - > drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig | 5 +- > drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 32 ++++++++- > drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 2 +- > include/linux/acpi.h | 6 ++ > 12 files changed, 187 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 10:50 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 01:54:32 PDT (-0700), haibo1.xu@intel.com wrote: > > This patch series enable RISC-V ACPI NUMA support which was based on > > the recently approved ACPI ECR[1]. > > > > Patch 1/4 add RISC-V specific acpi_numa.c file to parse NUMA information > > from SRAT and SLIT ACPI tables. > > Patch 2/4 add the common SRAT RINTC affinity structure handler. > > Patch 3/4 change the ACPI_NUMA to a hidden option since it would be selected > > by default on all supported platform. > > Patch 4/4 replace pr_info with pr_debug in arch_acpi_numa_init() to avoid > > potential boot noise on ACPI platforms that are not NUMA. > > > > Based-on: https://github.com/linux-riscv/linux-riscv/tree/for-next > > No big deal, but that's not actually my repo. Looks like it's just > mirroring something, I use the kernel.org git stuff these days. I > dropped it from the cover letter for the merge, it's not super useful > anyway because it's a branch so nobody will know what it means later. > > Aside from that things look good, I've got this queued up for the > tester. > Thanks! > > > > [1] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YTdDx2IPm5IeZjAW932EYU-tUtgS08tX/view?usp=sharing > > > > Testing: > > Since the ACPI AIA/PLIC support patch set is still under upstream review, > > hence it is tested using the poll based HVC SBI console and RAM disk. > > 1) Build latest Qemu with the following patch backported > > https://github.com/vlsunil/qemu/commit/42bd4eeefd5d4410a68f02d54fee406d8a1269b0 > > > > 2) Build latest EDK-II > > https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/OvmfPkg/RiscVVirt/README.md > > > > 3) Build Linux with the following configs enabled > > CONFIG_RISCV_SBI_V01=y > > CONFIG_SERIAL_EARLYCON_RISCV_SBI=y > > CONFIG_NONPORTABLE=y > > CONFIG_HVC_RISCV_SBI=y > > CONFIG_NUMA=y > > CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA=y > > > > 4) Build buildroot rootfs.cpio > > > > 5) Launch the Qemu machine > > qemu-system-riscv64 -nographic \ > > -machine virt,pflash0=pflash0,pflash1=pflash1 -smp 4 -m 8G \ > > -blockdev node-name=pflash0,driver=file,read-only=on,filename=RISCV_VIRT_CODE.fd \ > > -blockdev node-name=pflash1,driver=file,filename=RISCV_VIRT_VARS.fd \ > > -object memory-backend-ram,size=4G,id=m0 \ > > -object memory-backend-ram,size=4G,id=m1 \ > > -numa node,memdev=m0,cpus=0-1,nodeid=0 \ > > -numa node,memdev=m1,cpus=2-3,nodeid=1 \ > > -numa dist,src=0,dst=1,val=30 \ > > -kernel linux/arch/riscv/boot/Image \ > > -initrd buildroot/output/images/rootfs.cpio \ > > -append "root=/dev/ram ro console=hvc0 earlycon=sbi" > > > > [ 0.000000] ACPI: SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 [mem 0x80000000-0x17fffffff] > > [ 0.000000] ACPI: SRAT: Node 1 PXM 1 [mem 0x180000000-0x27fffffff] > > [ 0.000000] NUMA: NODE_DATA [mem 0x17fe3bc40-0x17fe3cfff] > > [ 0.000000] NUMA: NODE_DATA [mem 0x27fff4c40-0x27fff5fff] > > ... > > [ 0.000000] ACPI: NUMA: SRAT: PXM 0 -> HARTID 0x0 -> Node 0 > > [ 0.000000] ACPI: NUMA: SRAT: PXM 0 -> HARTID 0x1 -> Node 0 > > [ 0.000000] ACPI: NUMA: SRAT: PXM 1 -> HARTID 0x2 -> Node 1 > > [ 0.000000] ACPI: NUMA: SRAT: PXM 1 -> HARTID 0x3 -> Node 1 > > > > --- > > Changes since v3 > > - Rebase to linux-riscv/for-next(Linux 6.10-rc1) > > - Remove original patch 1/6 since it had been merged through > > ACPICA pull(commit fe1c408d50604f) > > - Remove original patch 4/6 since the related changes was > > introduced in commit 3a785e19f43267 > > > > Haibo Xu (4): > > ACPI: RISCV: Add NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT > > ACPI: NUMA: Add handler for SRAT RINTC affinity structure > > ACPI: NUMA: change the ACPI_NUMA to a hidden option > > ACPI: NUMA: replace pr_info with pr_debug in arch_acpi_numa_init > > > > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 - > > arch/loongarch/Kconfig | 1 - > > arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h | 15 +++- > > arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile | 1 + > > arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c | 5 -- > > arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 4 +- > > arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 - > > drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig | 5 +- > > drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 32 ++++++++- > > drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 2 +- > > include/linux/acpi.h | 6 ++ > > 12 files changed, 187 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c