diff mbox series

[v5.5,08/30] KVM: arm64: Use "new" memslot instead of userspace memory region

Message ID 20211104002531.1176691-9-seanjc@google.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series KVM: Scalable memslots implementation | expand

Commit Message

Sean Christopherson Nov. 4, 2021, 12:25 a.m. UTC 
Get the slot ID, hva, etc... from the "new" memslot instead of the
userspace memory region when preparing/committing a memory region.  This
will allow a future commit to drop @mem from the prepare/commit hooks
once all architectures convert to using "new".

Opportunistically wait to get the hva begin+end until after filtering out
the DELETE case in anticipation of a future commit passing NULL for @new
when deleting a memslot.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Reiji Watanabe Nov. 9, 2021, 6:36 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 5:26 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
>
> Get the slot ID, hva, etc... from the "new" memslot instead of the
> userspace memory region when preparing/committing a memory region.  This
> will allow a future commit to drop @mem from the prepare/commit hooks
> once all architectures convert to using "new".
>
> Opportunistically wait to get the hva begin+end until after filtering out
> the DELETE case in anticipation of a future commit passing NULL for @new
> when deleting a memslot.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
index cc41eadfbbf4..21213cba7c47 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1473,14 +1473,14 @@  void kvm_arch_commit_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
 	 * allocated dirty_bitmap[], dirty pages will be tracked while the
 	 * memory slot is write protected.
 	 */
-	if (change != KVM_MR_DELETE && mem->flags & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES) {
+	if (change != KVM_MR_DELETE && new->flags & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES) {
 		/*
 		 * If we're with initial-all-set, we don't need to write
 		 * protect any pages because they're all reported as dirty.
 		 * Huge pages and normal pages will be write protect gradually.
 		 */
 		if (!kvm_dirty_log_manual_protect_and_init_set(kvm)) {
-			kvm_mmu_wp_memory_region(kvm, mem->slot);
+			kvm_mmu_wp_memory_region(kvm, new->id);
 		}
 	}
 }
@@ -1491,8 +1491,7 @@  int kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
 				   struct kvm_memory_slot *new,
 				   enum kvm_mr_change change)
 {
-	hva_t hva = mem->userspace_addr;
-	hva_t reg_end = hva + mem->memory_size;
+	hva_t hva, reg_end;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (change != KVM_MR_CREATE && change != KVM_MR_MOVE &&
@@ -1506,6 +1505,9 @@  int kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
 	if ((new->base_gfn + new->npages) > (kvm_phys_size(kvm) >> PAGE_SHIFT))
 		return -EFAULT;
 
+	hva = new->userspace_addr;
+	reg_end = hva + (new->npages << PAGE_SHIFT);
+
 	mmap_read_lock(current->mm);
 	/*
 	 * A memory region could potentially cover multiple VMAs, and any holes