Message ID | 20220414014010.28110-1-palmer@rivosinc.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] RISC-V: Add CONFIG_{NON,}PORTABLE | expand |
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 3:40 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> wrote: > > From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> > > The RISC-V port has collected a handful of options that are > fundamentally non-portable. To prevent users from shooting themselves > in the foot, hide them all behind a config entry that explicitly calls > out that non-portable binaries may be produced. > > Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 06:40:10PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> > > The RISC-V port has collected a handful of options that are > fundamentally non-portable. To prevent users from shooting themselves > in the foot, hide them all behind a config entry that explicitly calls > out that non-portable binaries may be produced. > > Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> > > --- > > Changes since v1: > > * Fix a bunch of spelling mistakes. > * Move NONPORTABLE under the "Platform type" sub-heading. > * Fix the rv32i dependency. > --- > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > index 5adcbd9b5e88..3d8eb44eb889 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > @@ -213,6 +213,21 @@ source "arch/riscv/Kconfig.erratas" > > menu "Platform type" > > +config NONPORTABLE > + bool "Allow configurations that result in non-portable kernels" > + help > + RISC-V kernel binaries are compatible between all known systems > + whenever possible, but there are some use cases that can only be > + satisfied by configurations that result in kernel binaries that are > + not portable between systems. > + > + Selecting N does not guarantee kernels will be portable to all knows nit: s/knows/known ? Kind regards, Niklas
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 05:47:33 PDT (-0700), Niklas.Cassel@wdc.com wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 06:40:10PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: >> From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> >> >> The RISC-V port has collected a handful of options that are >> fundamentally non-portable. To prevent users from shooting themselves >> in the foot, hide them all behind a config entry that explicitly calls >> out that non-portable binaries may be produced. >> >> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> >> >> --- >> >> Changes since v1: >> >> * Fix a bunch of spelling mistakes. >> * Move NONPORTABLE under the "Platform type" sub-heading. >> * Fix the rv32i dependency. >> --- >> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig >> index 5adcbd9b5e88..3d8eb44eb889 100644 >> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig >> @@ -213,6 +213,21 @@ source "arch/riscv/Kconfig.erratas" >> >> menu "Platform type" >> >> +config NONPORTABLE >> + bool "Allow configurations that result in non-portable kernels" >> + help >> + RISC-V kernel binaries are compatible between all known systems >> + whenever possible, but there are some use cases that can only be >> + satisfied by configurations that result in kernel binaries that are >> + not portable between systems. >> + >> + Selecting N does not guarantee kernels will be portable to all knows > > nit: s/knows/known ? Thanks. Turns out I've got a bit of an issue here and this results in the defconfigs breaking, so I've got ahead and sent a v3 that includes the necessary bits to make those work along with this fixed up. > Kind regards, > Niklas
diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig index 5adcbd9b5e88..3d8eb44eb889 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig @@ -213,6 +213,21 @@ source "arch/riscv/Kconfig.erratas" menu "Platform type" +config NONPORTABLE + bool "Allow configurations that result in non-portable kernels" + help + RISC-V kernel binaries are compatible between all known systems + whenever possible, but there are some use cases that can only be + satisfied by configurations that result in kernel binaries that are + not portable between systems. + + Selecting N does not guarantee kernels will be portable to all knows + systems. Selecting any of the options guarded by NONPORTABLE will + result in kernel binaries that are unlikely to be portable between + systems. + + If unsure, say N. + choice prompt "Base ISA" default ARCH_RV64I @@ -222,6 +237,7 @@ choice config ARCH_RV32I bool "RV32I" + depends on NONPORTABLE select 32BIT select GENERIC_LIB_ASHLDI3 select GENERIC_LIB_ASHRDI3 @@ -485,6 +501,7 @@ config STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK config PHYS_RAM_BASE_FIXED bool "Explicitly specified physical RAM address" + depends on NONPORTABLE default n config PHYS_RAM_BASE @@ -498,7 +515,7 @@ config PHYS_RAM_BASE config XIP_KERNEL bool "Kernel Execute-In-Place from ROM" - depends on MMU && SPARSEMEM + depends on MMU && SPARSEMEM && NONPORTABLE # This prevents XIP from being enabled by all{yes,mod}config, which # fail to build since XIP doesn't support large kernels. depends on !COMPILE_TEST @@ -538,9 +555,16 @@ endmenu config BUILTIN_DTB bool - depends on OF + depends on OF && NONPORTABLE default y if XIP_KERNEL +config PORTABLE + bool + default !NONPORTABLE + select EFI + select OF + select MMU + menu "Power management options" source "kernel/power/Kconfig"