diff mbox series

MAINTAINERS: rectify entry for RISC-V/MICROCHIP POLARFIRE SOC SUPPORT

Message ID 20220811070506.12252-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series MAINTAINERS: rectify entry for RISC-V/MICROCHIP POLARFIRE SOC SUPPORT | expand

Commit Message

Lukas Bulwahn Aug. 11, 2022, 7:05 a.m. UTC
Commit 3cbd67384677 ("MAINTAINERS: add the Polarfire SoC's i2c driver")
adds the file entry for drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-microchip-core.c, but the
file is actually named drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-microchip-corei2c.c.

Repair this file reference in RISC-V/MICROCHIP POLARFIRE SOC SUPPORT.

Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
---
Conor, please ack.

Arnd, please pick this minor non-urgent clean-up patch.

 MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Conor Dooley Aug. 11, 2022, 7:14 a.m. UTC | #1
On 11/08/2022 08:05, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> Commit 3cbd67384677 ("MAINTAINERS: add the Polarfire SoC's i2c driver")
> adds the file entry for drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-microchip-core.c, but the
> file is actually named drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-microchip-corei2c.c.
> 
> Repair this file reference in RISC-V/MICROCHIP POLARFIRE SOC SUPPORT.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
> ---
> Conor, please ack.

FFS... Silly mistake from me there, keep getting caught out by
the maintainers entries when I do an inter-version rename.
Is there something I can add to my build scripts, other than the
get_maintainer selftest to catch these?
Thanks Lukas.

Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

> 
> Arnd, please pick this minor non-urgent clean-up patch.
> 
>   MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 9203efedea1e..797fde7e1821 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -17544,7 +17544,7 @@ F:      Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/microchip,mpfs-musb.yaml
>   F:     arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/
>   F:     drivers/char/hw_random/mpfs-rng.c
>   F:     drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c
> -F:     drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-microchip-core.c
> +F:     drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-microchip-corei2c.c
>   F:     drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c
>   F:     drivers/pci/controller/pcie-microchip-host.c
>   F:     drivers/rtc/rtc-mpfs.c
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Lukas Bulwahn Aug. 11, 2022, 7:32 a.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 9:14 AM <Conor.Dooley@microchip.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/08/2022 08:05, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> >
> > Commit 3cbd67384677 ("MAINTAINERS: add the Polarfire SoC's i2c driver")
> > adds the file entry for drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-microchip-core.c, but the
> > file is actually named drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-microchip-corei2c.c.
> >
> > Repair this file reference in RISC-V/MICROCHIP POLARFIRE SOC SUPPORT.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Conor, please ack.
>
> FFS... Silly mistake from me there, keep getting caught out by
> the maintainers entries when I do an inter-version rename.
> Is there something I can add to my build scripts, other than the
> get_maintainer selftest to catch these?
> Thanks Lukas.
>

I am not aware of another script. Why do you see the need for another one?

I acknowledge that ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --self-test=patterns
does take a few seconds (roughly 30 or so) and it checks the whole
MAINTAINERS file. Is that just not performant enough?

I usually have a set of patches in a local branch (all those patches
were sent out, but are pending somewhere) to get to zero warnings from
this script. In the last few years, I did get to some points in time
that ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --self-test=patterns reported zero
warnings on linux-next, but then new issues were introduced and the
hunt continued. When we are back at that point of zero warnings, I
will ask the intel 0-day testing team to include the '
./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --self-test=patterns' check into their
patch testing efforts, and hopefully that reduces the chance of
picking a patch with such an issue and we can keep it almost always at
zero warnings (wishful thinking on my side).

Lukas

> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>
> >
> > Arnd, please pick this minor non-urgent clean-up patch.
> >
> >   MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index 9203efedea1e..797fde7e1821 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -17544,7 +17544,7 @@ F:      Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/microchip,mpfs-musb.yaml
> >   F:     arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/
> >   F:     drivers/char/hw_random/mpfs-rng.c
> >   F:     drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c
> > -F:     drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-microchip-core.c
> > +F:     drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-microchip-corei2c.c
> >   F:     drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c
> >   F:     drivers/pci/controller/pcie-microchip-host.c
> >   F:     drivers/rtc/rtc-mpfs.c
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
>
Conor Dooley Aug. 11, 2022, 8:01 a.m. UTC | #3
On 11/08/2022 08:32, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 9:14 AM <Conor.Dooley@microchip.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/08/2022 08:05, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>>
>>> Commit 3cbd67384677 ("MAINTAINERS: add the Polarfire SoC's i2c driver")
>>> adds the file entry for drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-microchip-core.c, but the
>>> file is actually named drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-microchip-corei2c.c.
>>>
>>> Repair this file reference in RISC-V/MICROCHIP POLARFIRE SOC SUPPORT.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> Conor, please ack.
>>
>> FFS... Silly mistake from me there, keep getting caught out by
>> the maintainers entries when I do an inter-version rename.
>> Is there something I can add to my build scripts, other than the
>> get_maintainer selftest to catch these?
>> Thanks Lukas.
>>
> 
> I am not aware of another script. Why do you see the need for another one?
> 
> I acknowledge that ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --self-test=patterns
> does take a few seconds (roughly 30 or so) and it checks the whole
> MAINTAINERS file. Is that just not performant enough?


Yeah, it takes longer than my kernel build does! If there was something
faster I'd have added it to run every time I do a build so it'd be
impossible to miss.

It's fine, I'll just add it as a arg ;)

> 
> I usually have a set of patches in a local branch (all those patches
> were sent out, but are pending somewhere) to get to zero warnings from
> this script. In the last few years, I did get to some points in time
> that ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --self-test=patterns reported zero
> warnings on linux-next, but then new issues were introduced and the
> hunt continued. When we are back at that point of zero warnings, I
> will ask the intel 0-day testing team to include the '
> ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --self-test=patterns' check into their
> patch testing efforts, and hopefully that reduces the chance of
> picking a patch with such an issue and we can keep it almost always at
> zero warnings (wishful thinking on my side).

Yeah, would be nice for catching eejits like me :)
Thanks!

> 
> Lukas
> 
>> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>>
>>>
>>> Arnd, please pick this minor non-urgent clean-up patch.
>>>
>>>    MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>>> index 9203efedea1e..797fde7e1821 100644
>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>>> @@ -17544,7 +17544,7 @@ F:      Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/microchip,mpfs-musb.yaml
>>>    F:     arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/
>>>    F:     drivers/char/hw_random/mpfs-rng.c
>>>    F:     drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c
>>> -F:     drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-microchip-core.c
>>> +F:     drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-microchip-corei2c.c
>>>    F:     drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c
>>>    F:     drivers/pci/controller/pcie-microchip-host.c
>>>    F:     drivers/rtc/rtc-mpfs.c
>>> --
>>> 2.17.1
>>>
>>
Conor Dooley Aug. 11, 2022, 8:43 a.m. UTC | #4
On 11/08/2022 09:01, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On 11/08/2022 08:32, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 9:14 AM <Conor.Dooley@microchip.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/08/2022 08:05, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
>>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>>>
>>>> Commit 3cbd67384677 ("MAINTAINERS: add the Polarfire SoC's i2c driver")
>>>> adds the file entry for drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-microchip-core.c, but the
>>>> file is actually named drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-microchip-corei2c.c.
>>>>
>>>> Repair this file reference in RISC-V/MICROCHIP POLARFIRE SOC SUPPORT.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Conor, please ack.
>>>
>>> FFS... Silly mistake from me there, keep getting caught out by
>>> the maintainers entries when I do an inter-version rename.
>>> Is there something I can add to my build scripts, other than the
>>> get_maintainer selftest to catch these?
>>> Thanks Lukas.
>>>
>>
>> I am not aware of another script. Why do you see the need for another one?
>>
>> I acknowledge that ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --self-test=patterns
>> does take a few seconds (roughly 30 or so) and it checks the whole
>> MAINTAINERS file. Is that just not performant enough?
> 
> 
> Yeah, it takes longer than my kernel build does! If there was something
> faster I'd have added it to run every time I do a build so it'd be
> impossible to miss.
> 
> It's fine, I'll just add it as a arg ;)

Ah I missed the "patterns" bit when I read this, was wondering why it was
taking so long. I'll add it in some form, so hopefully that's the end of
fixing my stuff..
Wolfram Sang Aug. 11, 2022, 10:47 a.m. UTC | #5
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 09:05:06AM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> Commit 3cbd67384677 ("MAINTAINERS: add the Polarfire SoC's i2c driver")
> adds the file entry for drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-microchip-core.c, but the
> file is actually named drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-microchip-corei2c.c.
> 
> Repair this file reference in RISC-V/MICROCHIP POLARFIRE SOC SUPPORT.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 9203efedea1e..797fde7e1821 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -17544,7 +17544,7 @@  F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/microchip,mpfs-musb.yaml
 F:	arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/
 F:	drivers/char/hw_random/mpfs-rng.c
 F:	drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c
-F:	drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-microchip-core.c
+F:	drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-microchip-corei2c.c
 F:	drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c
 F:	drivers/pci/controller/pcie-microchip-host.c
 F:	drivers/rtc/rtc-mpfs.c