diff mbox series

[v2,03/11] RISC-V: KVM: Return correct code for hsm stop function

Message ID 20221215170046.2010255-4-atishp@rivosinc.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series KVM perf support | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
conchuod/tree_selection fail Guessing tree name failed

Commit Message

Atish Kumar Patra Dec. 15, 2022, 5 p.m. UTC
According to the SBI specification, the stop function can only
return error code SBI_ERR_FAILED. However, currently it returns
-EINVAL which will be mapped SBI_ERR_INVALID_PARAM.

Return the appropriate linux error code.

Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
---
 arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_hsm.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Andrew Jones Jan. 12, 2023, 10:28 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 09:00:38AM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> According to the SBI specification, the stop function can only
> return error code SBI_ERR_FAILED. However, currently it returns
> -EINVAL which will be mapped SBI_ERR_INVALID_PARAM.

I presume the mapping referred to here is kvm_linux_err_map_sbi().
If so, then -EPERM isn't correct either. That maps to SBI_ERR_DENIED.
The only thing that will ensure we get SBI_ERR_FAILURE (-1) is
anything not handled by the kvm_linux_err_map_sbi switch, as we
need to use the default.

Thanks,
drew

> 
> Return the appropriate linux error code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_hsm.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_hsm.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_hsm.c
> index 2e915ca..0f8d9fe 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_hsm.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_hsm.c
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static int kvm_sbi_hsm_vcpu_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  static int kvm_sbi_hsm_vcpu_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	if (vcpu->arch.power_off)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +		return -EPERM;
>  
>  	kvm_riscv_vcpu_power_off(vcpu);
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>
Atish Kumar Patra Jan. 12, 2023, 6:25 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 2:28 AM Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 09:00:38AM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> > According to the SBI specification, the stop function can only
> > return error code SBI_ERR_FAILED. However, currently it returns
> > -EINVAL which will be mapped SBI_ERR_INVALID_PARAM.
>
> I presume the mapping referred to here is kvm_linux_err_map_sbi().
> If so, then -EPERM isn't correct either. That maps to SBI_ERR_DENIED.
> The only thing that will ensure we get SBI_ERR_FAILURE (-1) is
> anything not handled by the kvm_linux_err_map_sbi switch, as we
> need to use the default.
>

It returns SBI_ERR_FAILURE in the next patch when kvm_linux_err_map_sbi
is removed. Maybe I should drop this patch. The next patch does the
correct thing anyways.

> Thanks,
> drew
>
> >
> > Return the appropriate linux error code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_hsm.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_hsm.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_hsm.c
> > index 2e915ca..0f8d9fe 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_hsm.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_hsm.c
> > @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static int kvm_sbi_hsm_vcpu_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >  static int kvm_sbi_hsm_vcpu_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >  {
> >       if (vcpu->arch.power_off)
> > -             return -EINVAL;
> > +             return -EPERM;
> >
> >       kvm_riscv_vcpu_power_off(vcpu);
> >
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
Andrew Jones Jan. 13, 2023, 7:25 a.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 10:25:06AM -0800, Atish Kumar Patra wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 2:28 AM Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 09:00:38AM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> > > According to the SBI specification, the stop function can only
> > > return error code SBI_ERR_FAILED. However, currently it returns
> > > -EINVAL which will be mapped SBI_ERR_INVALID_PARAM.
> >
> > I presume the mapping referred to here is kvm_linux_err_map_sbi().
> > If so, then -EPERM isn't correct either. That maps to SBI_ERR_DENIED.
> > The only thing that will ensure we get SBI_ERR_FAILURE (-1) is
> > anything not handled by the kvm_linux_err_map_sbi switch, as we
> > need to use the default.
> >
> 
> It returns SBI_ERR_FAILURE in the next patch when kvm_linux_err_map_sbi
> is removed. Maybe I should drop this patch. The next patch does the
> correct thing anyways.

Yeah, I saw that, but then we silently fix a bug in the next patch.
I like that this is a separate patch, but it should do what it says
it's doing :-)

Thanks,
drew
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_hsm.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_hsm.c
index 2e915ca..0f8d9fe 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_hsm.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_hsm.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@  static int kvm_sbi_hsm_vcpu_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 static int kvm_sbi_hsm_vcpu_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	if (vcpu->arch.power_off)
-		return -EINVAL;
+		return -EPERM;
 
 	kvm_riscv_vcpu_power_off(vcpu);