| Message ID | 20230126184025.2294823-3-dmatlack@google.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable |
| Headers | show |
| Series | KVM: Add a common API for range-based TLB invalidation | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| conchuod/tree_selection | fail | Failed to apply to next/pending-fixes or riscv/for-next |
On 2023/1/27 02:40, David Matlack wrote: > Use kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() instead of > CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_ARCH_TLB_FLUSH_ALL. The two mechanisms solve the same > problem, allowing architecture-specific code to provide a non-IPI > implementation of remote TLB flushing. > > Dropping CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_ARCH_TLB_FLUSH_ALL allows KVM to standardize > all architectures on kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() instead of maintaining > two mechanisms. > > Opt to standardize on kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() since it avoids > duplicating the generic TLB stats across architectures that implement > their own remote TLB flush. > > This adds an extra function call to the ARM64 kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() > path, but that is a small cost in comparison to flushing remote TLBs. > > No functional change intended. > > Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com> Looks good, Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <zenghui.yu@linux.dev>
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 10:40:20AM -0800, David Matlack wrote: > Use kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() instead of > CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_ARCH_TLB_FLUSH_ALL. The two mechanisms solve the same > problem, allowing architecture-specific code to provide a non-IPI > implementation of remote TLB flushing. > > Dropping CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_ARCH_TLB_FLUSH_ALL allows KVM to standardize > all architectures on kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() instead of maintaining > two mechanisms. > > Opt to standardize on kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() since it avoids > duplicating the generic TLB stats across architectures that implement > their own remote TLB flush. > > This adds an extra function call to the ARM64 kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() > path, but that is a small cost in comparison to flushing remote TLBs. > > No functional change intended. > > Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com> Acked-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 18:40:20 +0000, David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com> wrote: > > Use kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() instead of > CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_ARCH_TLB_FLUSH_ALL. The two mechanisms solve the same > problem, allowing architecture-specific code to provide a non-IPI > implementation of remote TLB flushing. > > Dropping CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_ARCH_TLB_FLUSH_ALL allows KVM to standardize > all architectures on kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() instead of maintaining > two mechanisms. > > Opt to standardize on kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() since it avoids > duplicating the generic TLB stats across architectures that implement > their own remote TLB flush. > > This adds an extra function call to the ARM64 kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() > path, but that is a small cost in comparison to flushing remote TLBs. > > No functional change intended. > > Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com> > --- > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +++ > arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig | 1 - > arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 6 +++--- > virt/kvm/Kconfig | 3 --- > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 2 -- > 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h > index 113e20fdbb56..062800f1dc54 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h > @@ -998,6 +998,9 @@ int __init kvm_set_ipa_limit(void); > #define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_VM_ALLOC > struct kvm *kvm_arch_alloc_vm(void); > > +#define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_FLUSH_REMOTE_TLBS > +int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm); > + > static inline bool kvm_vm_is_protected(struct kvm *kvm) > { > return false; > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig > index ca6eadeb7d1a..e9ac57098a0b 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig > @@ -25,7 +25,6 @@ menuconfig KVM > select MMU_NOTIFIER > select PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS > select HAVE_KVM_CPU_RELAX_INTERCEPT > - select HAVE_KVM_ARCH_TLB_FLUSH_ALL > select KVM_MMIO > select KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT > select KVM_XFER_TO_GUEST_WORK > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c > index 01352f5838a0..8840f65e0e40 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c > @@ -80,15 +80,15 @@ static bool memslot_is_logging(struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot) > } > > /** > - * kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() - flush all VM TLB entries for v7/8 > + * kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() - flush all VM TLB entries for v7/8 > * @kvm: pointer to kvm structure. > * > * Interface to HYP function to flush all VM TLB entries > */ > -void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm) > +int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm) > { > - ++kvm->stat.generic.remote_tlb_flush_requests; > kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid, &kvm->arch.mmu); > + return 0; > } > > static bool kvm_is_device_pfn(unsigned long pfn) > diff --git a/virt/kvm/Kconfig b/virt/kvm/Kconfig > index b74916de5183..484d0873061c 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/Kconfig > +++ b/virt/kvm/Kconfig > @@ -62,9 +62,6 @@ config HAVE_KVM_CPU_RELAX_INTERCEPT > config KVM_VFIO > bool > > -config HAVE_KVM_ARCH_TLB_FLUSH_ALL > - bool > - > config HAVE_KVM_INVALID_WAKEUPS > bool > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > index 277507463678..fefd3e3c8fe1 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > @@ -347,7 +347,6 @@ bool kvm_make_all_cpus_request(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int req) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_make_all_cpus_request); > > -#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_ARCH_TLB_FLUSH_ALL > void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm) > { > ++kvm->stat.generic.remote_tlb_flush_requests; > @@ -368,7 +367,6 @@ void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm) > ++kvm->stat.generic.remote_tlb_flush; > } For context, we currently have this: if (!kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlb(kvm) || kvm_make_all_cpus_request(kvm, KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH)) ++kvm->stat.generic.remote_tlb_flush; Is there any reason why we shouldn't move the KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH call into the arch-specific helpers? This is architecture specific, even if the majority of the supported architecture cannot do broadcast invalidation like arm64 does. Thanks, M.
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 18:40:20 +0000, David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com> wrote: > > @@ -368,7 +367,6 @@ void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm) > > ++kvm->stat.generic.remote_tlb_flush; > > } > > For context, we currently have this: > > if (!kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlb(kvm) > || kvm_make_all_cpus_request(kvm, KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH)) > ++kvm->stat.generic.remote_tlb_flush; > > Is there any reason why we shouldn't move the KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH call > into the arch-specific helpers? This is architecture specific, even if > the majority of the supported architecture cannot do broadcast > invalidation like arm64 does. s390 and PPC don't implement kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlb() at all, forcing them to implement the function just to implement what everyone except ARM does doesn't seem like the right trade off. As usual, x86 is the real oddball. All other architectures either use the purely generic KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH or they don't. x86 is the only one that sometimes wants to fallback. I can't see a clean way around that though, especially since MIPS apparently needs a notification _and_ a generic flush. Can the ARM hook be inlined? That would eliminate the extra call and should allow the compiler to optimize out the conditional and the request.
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h index 113e20fdbb56..062800f1dc54 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h @@ -998,6 +998,9 @@ int __init kvm_set_ipa_limit(void); #define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_VM_ALLOC struct kvm *kvm_arch_alloc_vm(void); +#define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_FLUSH_REMOTE_TLBS +int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm); + static inline bool kvm_vm_is_protected(struct kvm *kvm) { return false; diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig index ca6eadeb7d1a..e9ac57098a0b 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig @@ -25,7 +25,6 @@ menuconfig KVM select MMU_NOTIFIER select PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS select HAVE_KVM_CPU_RELAX_INTERCEPT - select HAVE_KVM_ARCH_TLB_FLUSH_ALL select KVM_MMIO select KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT select KVM_XFER_TO_GUEST_WORK diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c index 01352f5838a0..8840f65e0e40 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c @@ -80,15 +80,15 @@ static bool memslot_is_logging(struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot) } /** - * kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() - flush all VM TLB entries for v7/8 + * kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() - flush all VM TLB entries for v7/8 * @kvm: pointer to kvm structure. * * Interface to HYP function to flush all VM TLB entries */ -void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm) +int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm) { - ++kvm->stat.generic.remote_tlb_flush_requests; kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid, &kvm->arch.mmu); + return 0; } static bool kvm_is_device_pfn(unsigned long pfn) diff --git a/virt/kvm/Kconfig b/virt/kvm/Kconfig index b74916de5183..484d0873061c 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/Kconfig +++ b/virt/kvm/Kconfig @@ -62,9 +62,6 @@ config HAVE_KVM_CPU_RELAX_INTERCEPT config KVM_VFIO bool -config HAVE_KVM_ARCH_TLB_FLUSH_ALL - bool - config HAVE_KVM_INVALID_WAKEUPS bool diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c index 277507463678..fefd3e3c8fe1 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c @@ -347,7 +347,6 @@ bool kvm_make_all_cpus_request(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int req) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_make_all_cpus_request); -#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_ARCH_TLB_FLUSH_ALL void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm) { ++kvm->stat.generic.remote_tlb_flush_requests; @@ -368,7 +367,6 @@ void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm) ++kvm->stat.generic.remote_tlb_flush; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_flush_remote_tlbs); -#endif static void kvm_flush_shadow_all(struct kvm *kvm) {
Use kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() instead of CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_ARCH_TLB_FLUSH_ALL. The two mechanisms solve the same problem, allowing architecture-specific code to provide a non-IPI implementation of remote TLB flushing. Dropping CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_ARCH_TLB_FLUSH_ALL allows KVM to standardize all architectures on kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() instead of maintaining two mechanisms. Opt to standardize on kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() since it avoids duplicating the generic TLB stats across architectures that implement their own remote TLB flush. This adds an extra function call to the ARM64 kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() path, but that is a small cost in comparison to flushing remote TLBs. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +++ arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig | 1 - arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 6 +++--- virt/kvm/Kconfig | 3 --- virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 2 -- 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)