Message ID | 20230127182558.2416400-15-atishp@rivosinc.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | KVM perf support | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
conchuod/cover_letter | success | Series has a cover letter |
conchuod/tree_selection | success | Guessed tree name to be for-next |
conchuod/fixes_present | success | Fixes tag not required for -next series |
conchuod/maintainers_pattern | success | MAINTAINERS pattern errors before the patch: 13 and now 13 |
conchuod/verify_signedoff | success | Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer |
conchuod/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
conchuod/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
conchuod/build_rv64_gcc_allmodconfig | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
conchuod/alphanumeric_selects | success | Out of order selects before the patch: 57 and now 57 |
conchuod/build_rv32_defconfig | success | Build OK |
conchuod/dtb_warn_rv64 | success | Errors and warnings before: 2 this patch: 2 |
conchuod/header_inline | success | No static functions without inline keyword in header files |
conchuod/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 74 lines checked |
conchuod/source_inline | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_k210_defconfig | success | Build OK |
conchuod/verify_fixes | success | No Fixes tag |
conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_virt_defconfig | success | Build OK |
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 11:56 PM Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com> wrote: > > KVM supports firmware events now. Invoke the firmware event increment > function from appropriate places. > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com> Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> Regards, Anup > --- > arch/riscv/kvm/tlb.c | 4 ++++ > arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_replace.c | 7 +++++++ > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/tlb.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/tlb.c > index 309d79b..b797f7c 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/tlb.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/tlb.c > @@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ void kvm_riscv_local_tlb_sanitize(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > void kvm_riscv_fence_i_process(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_incr_fw(vcpu, SBI_PMU_FW_FENCE_I_RCVD); > local_flush_icache_all(); > } > > @@ -264,15 +265,18 @@ void kvm_riscv_hfence_process(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > d.addr, d.size, d.order); > break; > case KVM_RISCV_HFENCE_VVMA_ASID_GVA: > + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_incr_fw(vcpu, SBI_PMU_FW_HFENCE_VVMA_ASID_RCVD); > kvm_riscv_local_hfence_vvma_asid_gva( > READ_ONCE(v->vmid), d.asid, > d.addr, d.size, d.order); > break; > case KVM_RISCV_HFENCE_VVMA_ASID_ALL: > + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_incr_fw(vcpu, SBI_PMU_FW_HFENCE_VVMA_ASID_RCVD); > kvm_riscv_local_hfence_vvma_asid_all( > READ_ONCE(v->vmid), d.asid); > break; > case KVM_RISCV_HFENCE_VVMA_GVA: > + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_incr_fw(vcpu, SBI_PMU_FW_HFENCE_VVMA_RCVD); > kvm_riscv_local_hfence_vvma_gva( > READ_ONCE(v->vmid), > d.addr, d.size, d.order); > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_replace.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_replace.c > index abeb55f..71a671e 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_replace.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_replace.c > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ > #include <linux/kvm_host.h> > #include <asm/sbi.h> > #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_timer.h> > +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h> > #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h> > > static int kvm_sbi_ext_time_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run, > @@ -25,6 +26,7 @@ static int kvm_sbi_ext_time_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run, > return 0; > } > > + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_incr_fw(vcpu, SBI_PMU_FW_SET_TIMER); > #if __riscv_xlen == 32 > next_cycle = ((u64)cp->a1 << 32) | (u64)cp->a0; > #else > @@ -57,6 +59,7 @@ static int kvm_sbi_ext_ipi_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run, > return 0; > } > > + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_incr_fw(vcpu, SBI_PMU_FW_IPI_SENT); > kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, tmp, vcpu->kvm) { > if (hbase != -1UL) { > if (tmp->vcpu_id < hbase) > @@ -67,6 +70,7 @@ static int kvm_sbi_ext_ipi_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run, > ret = kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_interrupt(tmp, IRQ_VS_SOFT); > if (ret < 0) > break; > + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_incr_fw(tmp, SBI_PMU_FW_IPI_RECVD); > } > > return ret; > @@ -90,6 +94,7 @@ static int kvm_sbi_ext_rfence_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run > switch (funcid) { > case SBI_EXT_RFENCE_REMOTE_FENCE_I: > kvm_riscv_fence_i(vcpu->kvm, hbase, hmask); > + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_incr_fw(vcpu, SBI_PMU_FW_FENCE_I_SENT); > break; > case SBI_EXT_RFENCE_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA: > if (cp->a2 == 0 && cp->a3 == 0) > @@ -97,6 +102,7 @@ static int kvm_sbi_ext_rfence_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run > else > kvm_riscv_hfence_vvma_gva(vcpu->kvm, hbase, hmask, > cp->a2, cp->a3, PAGE_SHIFT); > + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_incr_fw(vcpu, SBI_PMU_FW_HFENCE_VVMA_SENT); > break; > case SBI_EXT_RFENCE_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA_ASID: > if (cp->a2 == 0 && cp->a3 == 0) > @@ -107,6 +113,7 @@ static int kvm_sbi_ext_rfence_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run > hbase, hmask, > cp->a2, cp->a3, > PAGE_SHIFT, cp->a4); > + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_incr_fw(vcpu, SBI_PMU_FW_HFENCE_VVMA_ASID_SENT); > break; > case SBI_EXT_RFENCE_REMOTE_HFENCE_GVMA: > case SBI_EXT_RFENCE_REMOTE_HFENCE_GVMA_VMID: > -- > 2.25.1 >
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/tlb.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/tlb.c index 309d79b..b797f7c 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/tlb.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/tlb.c @@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ void kvm_riscv_local_tlb_sanitize(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) void kvm_riscv_fence_i_process(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_incr_fw(vcpu, SBI_PMU_FW_FENCE_I_RCVD); local_flush_icache_all(); } @@ -264,15 +265,18 @@ void kvm_riscv_hfence_process(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) d.addr, d.size, d.order); break; case KVM_RISCV_HFENCE_VVMA_ASID_GVA: + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_incr_fw(vcpu, SBI_PMU_FW_HFENCE_VVMA_ASID_RCVD); kvm_riscv_local_hfence_vvma_asid_gva( READ_ONCE(v->vmid), d.asid, d.addr, d.size, d.order); break; case KVM_RISCV_HFENCE_VVMA_ASID_ALL: + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_incr_fw(vcpu, SBI_PMU_FW_HFENCE_VVMA_ASID_RCVD); kvm_riscv_local_hfence_vvma_asid_all( READ_ONCE(v->vmid), d.asid); break; case KVM_RISCV_HFENCE_VVMA_GVA: + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_incr_fw(vcpu, SBI_PMU_FW_HFENCE_VVMA_RCVD); kvm_riscv_local_hfence_vvma_gva( READ_ONCE(v->vmid), d.addr, d.size, d.order); diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_replace.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_replace.c index abeb55f..71a671e 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_replace.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_replace.c @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ #include <linux/kvm_host.h> #include <asm/sbi.h> #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_timer.h> +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h> #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h> static int kvm_sbi_ext_time_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run, @@ -25,6 +26,7 @@ static int kvm_sbi_ext_time_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run, return 0; } + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_incr_fw(vcpu, SBI_PMU_FW_SET_TIMER); #if __riscv_xlen == 32 next_cycle = ((u64)cp->a1 << 32) | (u64)cp->a0; #else @@ -57,6 +59,7 @@ static int kvm_sbi_ext_ipi_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run, return 0; } + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_incr_fw(vcpu, SBI_PMU_FW_IPI_SENT); kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, tmp, vcpu->kvm) { if (hbase != -1UL) { if (tmp->vcpu_id < hbase) @@ -67,6 +70,7 @@ static int kvm_sbi_ext_ipi_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run, ret = kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_interrupt(tmp, IRQ_VS_SOFT); if (ret < 0) break; + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_incr_fw(tmp, SBI_PMU_FW_IPI_RECVD); } return ret; @@ -90,6 +94,7 @@ static int kvm_sbi_ext_rfence_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run switch (funcid) { case SBI_EXT_RFENCE_REMOTE_FENCE_I: kvm_riscv_fence_i(vcpu->kvm, hbase, hmask); + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_incr_fw(vcpu, SBI_PMU_FW_FENCE_I_SENT); break; case SBI_EXT_RFENCE_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA: if (cp->a2 == 0 && cp->a3 == 0) @@ -97,6 +102,7 @@ static int kvm_sbi_ext_rfence_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run else kvm_riscv_hfence_vvma_gva(vcpu->kvm, hbase, hmask, cp->a2, cp->a3, PAGE_SHIFT); + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_incr_fw(vcpu, SBI_PMU_FW_HFENCE_VVMA_SENT); break; case SBI_EXT_RFENCE_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA_ASID: if (cp->a2 == 0 && cp->a3 == 0) @@ -107,6 +113,7 @@ static int kvm_sbi_ext_rfence_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run hbase, hmask, cp->a2, cp->a3, PAGE_SHIFT, cp->a4); + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_incr_fw(vcpu, SBI_PMU_FW_HFENCE_VVMA_ASID_SENT); break; case SBI_EXT_RFENCE_REMOTE_HFENCE_GVMA: case SBI_EXT_RFENCE_REMOTE_HFENCE_GVMA_VMID:
KVM supports firmware events now. Invoke the firmware event increment function from appropriate places. Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com> --- arch/riscv/kvm/tlb.c | 4 ++++ arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_replace.c | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)