Message ID | 20230629-paternity-grafted-b901b76d04a0@wendy (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 52909f1768023656d5c429873e2246a134289a95 |
Headers | show |
Series | [v1] RISC-V: drop error print from riscv_hartid_to_cpuid() | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
conchuod/cover_letter | success | Single patches do not need cover letters |
conchuod/tree_selection | success | Guessed tree name to be for-next at HEAD 488833ccdcac |
conchuod/fixes_present | success | Fixes tag not required for -next series |
conchuod/maintainers_pattern | success | MAINTAINERS pattern errors before the patch: 6 and now 6 |
conchuod/verify_signedoff | success | Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer |
conchuod/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
conchuod/build_rv64_clang_allmodconfig | success | Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8 |
conchuod/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
conchuod/build_rv64_gcc_allmodconfig | success | Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8 |
conchuod/build_rv32_defconfig | success | Build OK |
conchuod/dtb_warn_rv64 | success | Errors and warnings before: 20 this patch: 20 |
conchuod/header_inline | success | No static functions without inline keyword in header files |
conchuod/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 7 lines checked |
conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_k210_defconfig | success | Build OK |
conchuod/verify_fixes | success | Fixes tag looks correct |
conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_virt_defconfig | success | Build OK |
On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 12:33:34 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > As of commit 2ac874343749 ("RISC-V: split early & late of_node to > hartid mapping") my CI complains about newly added pr_err() messages > during boot, for example: > [ 0.000000] Couldn't find cpu id for hartid [0] > [ 0.000000] riscv-intc: unable to find hart id for /cpus/cpu@0/interrupt-controller > > Before the split, riscv_of_processor_hartid() contained a check for > whether the cpu was "available", before calling riscv_hartid_to_cpuid(), > but after the split riscv_of_processor_hartid() can be called for cpus > that are disabled. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] RISC-V: drop error print from riscv_hartid_to_cpuid() https://git.kernel.org/palmer/c/52909f176802 Best regards,
Hello: This patch was applied to riscv/linux.git (for-next) by Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>: On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 12:33:34 +0100 you wrote: > As of commit 2ac874343749 ("RISC-V: split early & late of_node to > hartid mapping") my CI complains about newly added pr_err() messages > during boot, for example: > [ 0.000000] Couldn't find cpu id for hartid [0] > [ 0.000000] riscv-intc: unable to find hart id for /cpus/cpu@0/interrupt-controller > > Before the split, riscv_of_processor_hartid() contained a check for > whether the cpu was "available", before calling riscv_hartid_to_cpuid(), > but after the split riscv_of_processor_hartid() can be called for cpus > that are disabled. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [v1] RISC-V: drop error print from riscv_hartid_to_cpuid() https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/52909f176802 You are awesome, thank you!
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/smp.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/smp.c index 23e533766a49..85bbce0f758c 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/smp.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/smp.c @@ -58,7 +58,6 @@ int riscv_hartid_to_cpuid(unsigned long hartid) if (cpuid_to_hartid_map(i) == hartid) return i; - pr_err("Couldn't find cpu id for hartid [%lu]\n", hartid); return -ENOENT; }
As of commit 2ac874343749 ("RISC-V: split early & late of_node to hartid mapping") my CI complains about newly added pr_err() messages during boot, for example: [ 0.000000] Couldn't find cpu id for hartid [0] [ 0.000000] riscv-intc: unable to find hart id for /cpus/cpu@0/interrupt-controller Before the split, riscv_of_processor_hartid() contained a check for whether the cpu was "available", before calling riscv_hartid_to_cpuid(), but after the split riscv_of_processor_hartid() can be called for cpus that are disabled. Most callers of riscv_hartid_to_cpuid() already report custom errors where it falls, making this print superfluous in those case. In other places, the print adds nothing - see riscv_intc_init() for example. Fixes: 2ac874343749 ("RISC-V: split early & late of_node to hartid mapping") Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> --- Sunil, the acpi user of this function I was unclear about. Could you please take a look and see if disabling this print is okay there, or if I should add a localised error print on failure? CC: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> CC: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> CC: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> CC: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> CC: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org --- arch/riscv/kernel/smp.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)