Message ID | 20230629-uprising-harbor-439b85492132@wendy (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | RISC-V: Probe DT extension support using riscv,isa-extensions & riscv,isa-base | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
conchuod/cover_letter | success | Series has a cover letter |
conchuod/tree_selection | success | Guessed tree name to be for-next at HEAD 488833ccdcac |
conchuod/fixes_present | success | Fixes tag not required for -next series |
conchuod/maintainers_pattern | success | MAINTAINERS pattern errors before the patch: 6 and now 6 |
conchuod/verify_signedoff | success | Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer |
conchuod/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
conchuod/build_rv64_clang_allmodconfig | success | Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8 |
conchuod/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
conchuod/build_rv64_gcc_allmodconfig | success | Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9 |
conchuod/build_rv32_defconfig | success | Build OK |
conchuod/dtb_warn_rv64 | success | Errors and warnings before: 20 this patch: 20 |
conchuod/header_inline | success | No static functions without inline keyword in header files |
conchuod/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 71 lines checked |
conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_k210_defconfig | success | Build OK |
conchuod/verify_fixes | success | No Fixes tag |
conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_virt_defconfig | success | Build OK |
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 1:30 AM Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> wrote: > > So that riscv_fill_hwcap() can use riscv_isa_ext to probe for single > letter extensions, add them to it. > As a result, what gets spat out in /proc/cpuinfo will become borked, as > single letter extensions will be printed as part of the base extensions > and while printing from riscv_isa_arr. Take the opportunity to unify the > printing of the isa string, using the new member of riscv_isa_ext_data > in the process. > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c index c89abf8ef6de..d0dfd88221df 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c @@ -160,41 +160,26 @@ arch_initcall(riscv_cpuinfo_init); #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS -static void print_isa_ext(struct seq_file *f) -{ - for (int i = 0; i < riscv_isa_ext_count; i++) { - const struct riscv_isa_ext_data *edata = &riscv_isa_ext[i]; - if (!__riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, edata->id)) - continue; - - seq_printf(f, "_%s", edata->name); - } -} - -/* - * These are the only valid base (single letter) ISA extensions as per the spec. - * It also specifies the canonical order in which it appears in the spec. - * Some of the extension may just be a place holder for now (B, K, P, J). - * This should be updated once corresponding extensions are ratified. - */ -static const char base_riscv_exts[13] = "imafdqcbkjpvh"; - static void print_isa(struct seq_file *f) { - int i; - seq_puts(f, "isa\t\t: "); + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT)) seq_write(f, "rv32", 4); else seq_write(f, "rv64", 4); - for (i = 0; i < sizeof(base_riscv_exts); i++) { - if (__riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, base_riscv_exts[i] - 'a')) - /* Print only enabled the base ISA extensions */ - seq_write(f, &base_riscv_exts[i], 1); + for (int i = 0; i < riscv_isa_ext_count; i++) { + if (!__riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, riscv_isa_ext[i].id)) + continue; + + /* Only multi-letter extensions are split by underscores */ + if (strnlen(riscv_isa_ext[i].name, 2) != 1) + seq_puts(f, "_"); + + seq_printf(f, "%s", riscv_isa_ext[i].name); } - print_isa_ext(f); + seq_puts(f, "\n"); } diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c index 6d8cd45af723..bf7e8e8852f0 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -144,6 +144,19 @@ static bool riscv_isa_extension_check(int id) * New entries to this struct should follow the ordering rules described above. */ const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[] = { + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(i, RISCV_ISA_EXT_i), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(m, RISCV_ISA_EXT_m), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(a, RISCV_ISA_EXT_a), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(f, RISCV_ISA_EXT_f), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(d, RISCV_ISA_EXT_d), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(q, RISCV_ISA_EXT_q), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(c, RISCV_ISA_EXT_c), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(b, RISCV_ISA_EXT_b), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(k, RISCV_ISA_EXT_k), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(j, RISCV_ISA_EXT_j), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(p, RISCV_ISA_EXT_p), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(v, RISCV_ISA_EXT_v), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(h, RISCV_ISA_EXT_h), __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicbom, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM), __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicboz, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOZ), __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicntr, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICNTR),