Message ID | 20230722113445.630714-2-alexghiti@rivosinc.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | [v5,1/3] Documentation: arm: Add bootargs to the table of added DT parameters | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
conchuod/cover_letter | warning | Series does not have a cover letter |
conchuod/tree_selection | success | Guessed tree name to be for-next at HEAD 471aba2e4760 |
conchuod/fixes_present | success | Fixes tag not required for -next series |
conchuod/maintainers_pattern | success | MAINTAINERS pattern errors before the patch: 4 and now 4 |
conchuod/verify_signedoff | success | Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer |
conchuod/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
conchuod/build_rv64_clang_allmodconfig | success | Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9 |
conchuod/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
conchuod/build_rv64_gcc_allmodconfig | success | Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9 |
conchuod/build_rv32_defconfig | success | Build OK |
conchuod/dtb_warn_rv64 | success | Errors and warnings before: 3 this patch: 3 |
conchuod/header_inline | success | No static functions without inline keyword in header files |
conchuod/checkpatch | warning | WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating? |
conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_k210_defconfig | success | Build OK |
conchuod/verify_fixes | success | No Fixes tag |
conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_virt_defconfig | success | Build OK |
Hi, On 7/22/23 04:34, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > This document describes the constraints and requirements of the early > boot process in a RISC-V kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com> > Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com> > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > Reviewed-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> > Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> > Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com> > Reviewed-by: Song Shuai <songshuaishuai@tinylab.org> > Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> > --- > - Changes in v5: > * Rebase on top of docs-next > > Documentation/riscv/boot-image-header.rst | 3 - > Documentation/riscv/boot.rst | 169 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > Documentation/riscv/index.rst | 1 + > 3 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/riscv/boot.rst > > diff --git a/Documentation/riscv/boot.rst b/Documentation/riscv/boot.rst > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..f890ac442c91 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/riscv/boot.rst > @@ -0,0 +1,169 @@ > +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > + > +=============================================== > +RISC-V Kernel Boot Requirements and Constraints > +=============================================== > + > +:Author: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com> > +:Date: 23 May 2023 > + > +This document describes what the RISC-V kernel expects from bootloaders and > +firmware, but also the constraints that any developer must have in mind when I would s/but/and/. > +touching the early boot process. For the purposes of this document, the > +``early boot process`` refers to any code that runs before the final virtual > +mapping is set up. > + > +Pre-kernel Requirements and Constraints > +======================================= > + > +The RISC-V kernel expects the following of bootloaders and platform firmware: > + > +Register state > +-------------- > + > +The RISC-V kernel expects: > + > + * ``$a0`` to contain the hartid of the current core. > + * ``$a1`` to contain the address of the devicetree in memory. > + > +CSR state > +--------- > + > +The RISC-V kernel expects: > + > + * ``$satp = 0``: the MMU, if present, must be disabled. > + > +Reserved memory for resident firmware > +------------------------------------- > + > +The RISC-V kernel must not map any resident memory, or memory protected with > +PMPs, in the direct mapping, so the firmware must correctly mark those regions > +as per the devicetree specification and/or the UEFI specification. > + > +Kernel location > +--------------- > + > +The RISC-V kernel expects to be placed at a PMD boundary (2MB aligned for rv64 > +and 4MB aligned for rv32). Note that the EFI stub will physically relocate the > +kernel if that's not the case. > + > +Hardware description > +-------------------- > + > +The firmware can pass either a devicetree or ACPI tables to the RISC-V kernel. > + > +The devicetree is either passed directly to the kernel from the previous stage > +using the ``$a1`` register, or when booting with UEFI, it can be passed using the > +EFI configuration table. > + > +The ACPI tables are passed to the kernel using the EFI configuration table. In > +this case, a tiny devicetree is still created by the EFI stub. Please refer to > +"EFI stub and devicetree" section below for details about this devicetree. > + > +Kernel entrance > +--------------- How about "entry" instead of "entrance"? > + > +On SMP systems, there are 2 methods to enter the kernel: > + > +- ``RISCV_BOOT_SPINWAIT``: the firmware releases all harts in the kernel, one hart > + wins a lottery and executes the early boot code while the other harts are > + parked waiting for the initialization to finish. This method is mostly used to > + support older firmwares without SBI HSM extension and M-mode RISC-V kernel. > +- ``Ordered booting``: the firmware releases only one hart that will execute the > + initialization phase and then will start all other harts using the SBI HSM > + extension. The ordered booting method is the preferred booting method for > + booting the RISC-V kernel because it can support cpu hotplug and kexec. preferably s/cpu/CPU/ > + > +UEFI > +---- [snip] I can't say how correct the documentation is, but it is well-written and has no issues with punctuation, grammar, or spelling AFAICT, so you can take this if you want it: Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> thanks.
Hi Randy, On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 10:19 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 7/22/23 04:34, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > > This document describes the constraints and requirements of the early > > boot process in a RISC-V kernel. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com> > > Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com> > > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > > Reviewed-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> > > Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> > > Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com> > > Reviewed-by: Song Shuai <songshuaishuai@tinylab.org> > > Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> > > --- > > - Changes in v5: > > * Rebase on top of docs-next > > > > Documentation/riscv/boot-image-header.rst | 3 - > > Documentation/riscv/boot.rst | 169 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Documentation/riscv/index.rst | 1 + > > 3 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/riscv/boot.rst > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/riscv/boot.rst b/Documentation/riscv/boot.rst > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..f890ac442c91 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/Documentation/riscv/boot.rst > > @@ -0,0 +1,169 @@ > > +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > + > > +=============================================== > > +RISC-V Kernel Boot Requirements and Constraints > > +=============================================== > > + > > +:Author: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com> > > +:Date: 23 May 2023 > > + > > +This document describes what the RISC-V kernel expects from bootloaders and > > +firmware, but also the constraints that any developer must have in mind when > > I would s/but/and/. Ok I change that, thanks. > > > +touching the early boot process. For the purposes of this document, the > > +``early boot process`` refers to any code that runs before the final virtual > > +mapping is set up. > > + > > +Pre-kernel Requirements and Constraints > > +======================================= > > + > > +The RISC-V kernel expects the following of bootloaders and platform firmware: > > + > > +Register state > > +-------------- > > + > > +The RISC-V kernel expects: > > + > > + * ``$a0`` to contain the hartid of the current core. > > + * ``$a1`` to contain the address of the devicetree in memory. > > + > > +CSR state > > +--------- > > + > > +The RISC-V kernel expects: > > + > > + * ``$satp = 0``: the MMU, if present, must be disabled. > > + > > +Reserved memory for resident firmware > > +------------------------------------- > > + > > +The RISC-V kernel must not map any resident memory, or memory protected with > > +PMPs, in the direct mapping, so the firmware must correctly mark those regions > > +as per the devicetree specification and/or the UEFI specification. > > + > > +Kernel location > > +--------------- > > + > > +The RISC-V kernel expects to be placed at a PMD boundary (2MB aligned for rv64 > > +and 4MB aligned for rv32). Note that the EFI stub will physically relocate the > > +kernel if that's not the case. > > + > > +Hardware description > > +-------------------- > > + > > +The firmware can pass either a devicetree or ACPI tables to the RISC-V kernel. > > + > > +The devicetree is either passed directly to the kernel from the previous stage > > +using the ``$a1`` register, or when booting with UEFI, it can be passed using the > > +EFI configuration table. > > + > > +The ACPI tables are passed to the kernel using the EFI configuration table. In > > +this case, a tiny devicetree is still created by the EFI stub. Please refer to > > +"EFI stub and devicetree" section below for details about this devicetree. > > + > > +Kernel entrance > > +--------------- > > How about "entry" instead of "entrance"? I have to admit that I don't have the nuance between both words, if 'entry' is more appropriate, I'll change it. > > > + > > +On SMP systems, there are 2 methods to enter the kernel: > > + > > +- ``RISCV_BOOT_SPINWAIT``: the firmware releases all harts in the kernel, one hart > > + wins a lottery and executes the early boot code while the other harts are > > + parked waiting for the initialization to finish. This method is mostly used to > > + support older firmwares without SBI HSM extension and M-mode RISC-V kernel. > > +- ``Ordered booting``: the firmware releases only one hart that will execute the > > + initialization phase and then will start all other harts using the SBI HSM > > + extension. The ordered booting method is the preferred booting method for > > + booting the RISC-V kernel because it can support cpu hotplug and kexec. > > preferably s/cpu/CPU/ Done! > > > + > > +UEFI > > +---- > > [snip] > > I can't say how correct the documentation is, but it is well-written > and has no issues with punctuation, grammar, or spelling AFAICT, so > you can take this if you want it: > > Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Thanks for the nice comments, @Conor Dooley (and others) really helped! I'll respin a new version today, Alex > > thanks. > -- > ~Randy
diff --git a/Documentation/riscv/boot-image-header.rst b/Documentation/riscv/boot-image-header.rst index d7752533865f..a4a45310c4c4 100644 --- a/Documentation/riscv/boot-image-header.rst +++ b/Documentation/riscv/boot-image-header.rst @@ -7,9 +7,6 @@ Boot image header in RISC-V Linux This document only describes the boot image header details for RISC-V Linux. -TODO: - Write a complete booting guide. - The following 64-byte header is present in decompressed Linux kernel image:: u32 code0; /* Executable code */ diff --git a/Documentation/riscv/boot.rst b/Documentation/riscv/boot.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..f890ac442c91 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/riscv/boot.rst @@ -0,0 +1,169 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +=============================================== +RISC-V Kernel Boot Requirements and Constraints +=============================================== + +:Author: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com> +:Date: 23 May 2023 + +This document describes what the RISC-V kernel expects from bootloaders and +firmware, but also the constraints that any developer must have in mind when +touching the early boot process. For the purposes of this document, the +``early boot process`` refers to any code that runs before the final virtual +mapping is set up. + +Pre-kernel Requirements and Constraints +======================================= + +The RISC-V kernel expects the following of bootloaders and platform firmware: + +Register state +-------------- + +The RISC-V kernel expects: + + * ``$a0`` to contain the hartid of the current core. + * ``$a1`` to contain the address of the devicetree in memory. + +CSR state +--------- + +The RISC-V kernel expects: + + * ``$satp = 0``: the MMU, if present, must be disabled. + +Reserved memory for resident firmware +------------------------------------- + +The RISC-V kernel must not map any resident memory, or memory protected with +PMPs, in the direct mapping, so the firmware must correctly mark those regions +as per the devicetree specification and/or the UEFI specification. + +Kernel location +--------------- + +The RISC-V kernel expects to be placed at a PMD boundary (2MB aligned for rv64 +and 4MB aligned for rv32). Note that the EFI stub will physically relocate the +kernel if that's not the case. + +Hardware description +-------------------- + +The firmware can pass either a devicetree or ACPI tables to the RISC-V kernel. + +The devicetree is either passed directly to the kernel from the previous stage +using the ``$a1`` register, or when booting with UEFI, it can be passed using the +EFI configuration table. + +The ACPI tables are passed to the kernel using the EFI configuration table. In +this case, a tiny devicetree is still created by the EFI stub. Please refer to +"EFI stub and devicetree" section below for details about this devicetree. + +Kernel entrance +--------------- + +On SMP systems, there are 2 methods to enter the kernel: + +- ``RISCV_BOOT_SPINWAIT``: the firmware releases all harts in the kernel, one hart + wins a lottery and executes the early boot code while the other harts are + parked waiting for the initialization to finish. This method is mostly used to + support older firmwares without SBI HSM extension and M-mode RISC-V kernel. +- ``Ordered booting``: the firmware releases only one hart that will execute the + initialization phase and then will start all other harts using the SBI HSM + extension. The ordered booting method is the preferred booting method for + booting the RISC-V kernel because it can support cpu hotplug and kexec. + +UEFI +---- + +UEFI memory map +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +When booting with UEFI, the RISC-V kernel will use only the EFI memory map to +populate the system memory. + +The UEFI firmware must parse the subnodes of the ``/reserved-memory`` devicetree +node and abide by the devicetree specification to convert the attributes of +those subnodes (``no-map`` and ``reusable``) into their correct EFI equivalent +(refer to section "3.5.4 /reserved-memory and UEFI" of the devicetree +specification v0.4-rc1). + +RISCV_EFI_BOOT_PROTOCOL +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +When booting with UEFI, the EFI stub requires the boot hartid in order to pass +it to the RISC-V kernel in ``$a1``. The EFI stub retrieves the boot hartid using +one of the following methods: + +- ``RISCV_EFI_BOOT_PROTOCOL`` (**preferred**). +- ``boot-hartid`` devicetree subnode (**deprecated**). + +Any new firmware must implement ``RISCV_EFI_BOOT_PROTOCOL`` as the devicetree +based approach is deprecated now. + +Early Boot Requirements and Constraints +======================================= + +The RISC-V kernel's early boot process operates under the following constraints: + +EFI stub and devicetree +----------------------- + +When booting with UEFI, the devicetree is supplemented (or created) by the EFI +stub with the same parameters as arm64 which are described at the paragraph +"UEFI kernel support on ARM" in Documentation/arm/uefi.rst. + +Virtual mapping installation +---------------------------- + +The installation of the virtual mapping is done in 2 steps in the RISC-V kernel: + +1. ``setup_vm()`` installs a temporary kernel mapping in ``early_pg_dir`` which + allows discovery of the system memory. Only the kernel text/data are mapped + at this point. When establishing this mapping, no allocation can be done + (since the system memory is not known yet), so ``early_pg_dir`` page table is + statically allocated (using only one table for each level). + +2. ``setup_vm_final()`` creates the final kernel mapping in ``swapper_pg_dir`` + and takes advantage of the discovered system memory to create the linear + mapping. When establishing this mapping, the kernel can allocate memory but + cannot access it directly (since the direct mapping is not present yet), so + it uses temporary mappings in the fixmap region to be able to access the + newly allocated page table levels. + +For ``virt_to_phys()`` and ``phys_to_virt()`` to be able to correctly convert +direct mapping addresses to physical addresses, they need to know the start of +the DRAM. This happens after step 1, right before step 2 installs the direct +mapping (see ``setup_bootmem()`` function in arch/riscv/mm/init.c). Any usage of +those macros before the final virtual mapping is installed must be carefully +examined. + +Devicetree mapping via fixmap +----------------------------- + +As the ``reserved_mem`` array is initialized with virtual addresses established +by ``setup_vm()``, and used with the mapping established by +``setup_vm_final()``, the RISC-V kernel uses the fixmap region to map the +devicetree. This ensures that the devicetree remains accessible by both virtual +mappings. + +Pre-MMU execution +----------------- + +A few pieces of code need to run before even the first virtual mapping is +established. These are the installation of the first virtual mapping itself, +patching of early alternatives and the early parsing of the kernel command line. +That code must be very carefully compiled as: + +- ``-fno-pie``: This is needed for relocatable kernels which use ``-fPIE``, + since otherwise, any access to a global symbol would go through the GOT which + is only relocated virtually. +- ``-mcmodel=medany``: Any access to a global symbol must be PC-relative to + avoid any relocations to happen before the MMU is setup. +- *all* instrumentation must also be disabled (that includes KASAN, ftrace and + others). + +As using a symbol from a different compilation unit requires this unit to be +compiled with those flags, we advise, as much as possible, not to use external +symbols. diff --git a/Documentation/riscv/index.rst b/Documentation/riscv/index.rst index 81cf6e616476..4dab0cb4b900 100644 --- a/Documentation/riscv/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/riscv/index.rst @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ RISC-V architecture :maxdepth: 1 acpi + boot boot-image-header vm-layout hwprobe