diff mbox series

riscv: correct riscv_insn_is_c_jr() and riscv_insn_is_c_jalr()

Message ID 20230731183925.152145-1-namcaov@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 79bc3f85c51fc352f8e684ba6b626f677a3aa230
Headers show
Series riscv: correct riscv_insn_is_c_jr() and riscv_insn_is_c_jalr() | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
conchuod/cover_letter success Single patches do not need cover letters
conchuod/tree_selection success Guessed tree name to be for-next at HEAD 471aba2e4760
conchuod/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
conchuod/maintainers_pattern success MAINTAINERS pattern errors before the patch: 4 and now 4
conchuod/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
conchuod/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
conchuod/build_rv64_clang_allmodconfig success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
conchuod/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
conchuod/build_rv64_gcc_allmodconfig success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
conchuod/build_rv32_defconfig success Build OK
conchuod/dtb_warn_rv64 success Errors and warnings before: 3 this patch: 3
conchuod/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
conchuod/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 33 lines checked
conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_k210_defconfig success Build OK
conchuod/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_virt_defconfig success Build OK

Commit Message

Nam Cao July 31, 2023, 6:39 p.m. UTC
The instructions c.jr and c.jalr must have rs1 != 0, but
riscv_insn_is_c_jr() and riscv_insn_is_c_jalr() do not check for this. So,
riscv_insn_is_c_jr() can match a reserved encoding, while
riscv_insn_is_c_jalr() can match the c.ebreak instruction.

Rewrite them with check for rs1 != 0.

Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcaov@gmail.com>
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/insn.h | 15 +++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Charlie Jenkins Aug. 9, 2023, 12:04 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 08:39:25PM +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> The instructions c.jr and c.jalr must have rs1 != 0, but
> riscv_insn_is_c_jr() and riscv_insn_is_c_jalr() do not check for this. So,
> riscv_insn_is_c_jr() can match a reserved encoding, while
> riscv_insn_is_c_jalr() can match the c.ebreak instruction.
> 
> Rewrite them with check for rs1 != 0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcaov@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/insn.h | 15 +++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/insn.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/insn.h
> index 4e1505cef8aa..fce00400c9bc 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/insn.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/insn.h
> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@
>  #define RVC_INSN_FUNCT4_OPOFF	12
>  #define RVC_INSN_FUNCT3_MASK	GENMASK(15, 13)
>  #define RVC_INSN_FUNCT3_OPOFF	13
> +#define RVC_INSN_J_RS1_MASK	GENMASK(11, 7)
>  #define RVC_INSN_J_RS2_MASK	GENMASK(6, 2)
>  #define RVC_INSN_OPCODE_MASK	GENMASK(1, 0)
>  #define RVC_ENCODE_FUNCT3(f_)	(RVC_FUNCT3_##f_ << RVC_INSN_FUNCT3_OPOFF)
> @@ -245,8 +246,6 @@ __RISCV_INSN_FUNCS(c_jal, RVC_MASK_C_JAL, RVC_MATCH_C_JAL)
>  __RISCV_INSN_FUNCS(auipc, RVG_MASK_AUIPC, RVG_MATCH_AUIPC)
>  __RISCV_INSN_FUNCS(jalr, RVG_MASK_JALR, RVG_MATCH_JALR)
>  __RISCV_INSN_FUNCS(jal, RVG_MASK_JAL, RVG_MATCH_JAL)
> -__RISCV_INSN_FUNCS(c_jr, RVC_MASK_C_JR, RVC_MATCH_C_JR)
> -__RISCV_INSN_FUNCS(c_jalr, RVC_MASK_C_JALR, RVC_MATCH_C_JALR)
>  __RISCV_INSN_FUNCS(c_j, RVC_MASK_C_J, RVC_MATCH_C_J)
>  __RISCV_INSN_FUNCS(beq, RVG_MASK_BEQ, RVG_MATCH_BEQ)
>  __RISCV_INSN_FUNCS(bne, RVG_MASK_BNE, RVG_MATCH_BNE)
> @@ -273,6 +272,18 @@ static __always_inline bool riscv_insn_is_branch(u32 code)
>  	return (code & RV_INSN_OPCODE_MASK) == RVG_OPCODE_BRANCH;
>  }
>  
> +static __always_inline bool riscv_insn_is_c_jr(u32 code)
> +{
> +	return (code & RVC_MASK_C_JR) == RVC_MATCH_C_JR &&
> +	       (code & RVC_INSN_J_RS1_MASK) != 0;
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline bool riscv_insn_is_c_jalr(u32 code)
> +{
> +	return (code & RVC_MASK_C_JALR) == RVC_MATCH_C_JALR &&
> +	       (code & RVC_INSN_J_RS1_MASK) != 0;
> +}
> +
>  #define RV_IMM_SIGN(x) (-(((x) >> 31) & 1))
>  #define RVC_IMM_SIGN(x) (-(((x) >> 12) & 1))
>  #define RV_X(X, s, mask)  (((X) >> (s)) & (mask))
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
Good catch. You can add:

Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
Björn Töpel Aug. 14, 2023, 12:07 p.m. UTC | #2
Nam Cao <namcaov@gmail.com> writes:

> The instructions c.jr and c.jalr must have rs1 != 0, but
> riscv_insn_is_c_jr() and riscv_insn_is_c_jalr() do not check for this. So,
> riscv_insn_is_c_jr() can match a reserved encoding, while
> riscv_insn_is_c_jalr() can match the c.ebreak instruction.
>
> Rewrite them with check for rs1 != 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcaov@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/insn.h | 15 +++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/insn.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/insn.h
> index 4e1505cef8aa..fce00400c9bc 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/insn.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/insn.h
> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@
>  #define RVC_INSN_FUNCT4_OPOFF	12
>  #define RVC_INSN_FUNCT3_MASK	GENMASK(15, 13)
>  #define RVC_INSN_FUNCT3_OPOFF	13
> +#define RVC_INSN_J_RS1_MASK	GENMASK(11, 7)
>  #define RVC_INSN_J_RS2_MASK	GENMASK(6, 2)
>  #define RVC_INSN_OPCODE_MASK	GENMASK(1, 0)
>  #define RVC_ENCODE_FUNCT3(f_)	(RVC_FUNCT3_##f_ << RVC_INSN_FUNCT3_OPOFF)
> @@ -245,8 +246,6 @@ __RISCV_INSN_FUNCS(c_jal, RVC_MASK_C_JAL, RVC_MATCH_C_JAL)
>  __RISCV_INSN_FUNCS(auipc, RVG_MASK_AUIPC, RVG_MATCH_AUIPC)
>  __RISCV_INSN_FUNCS(jalr, RVG_MASK_JALR, RVG_MATCH_JALR)
>  __RISCV_INSN_FUNCS(jal, RVG_MASK_JAL, RVG_MATCH_JAL)
> -__RISCV_INSN_FUNCS(c_jr, RVC_MASK_C_JR, RVC_MATCH_C_JR)
> -__RISCV_INSN_FUNCS(c_jalr, RVC_MASK_C_JALR, RVC_MATCH_C_JALR)
>  __RISCV_INSN_FUNCS(c_j, RVC_MASK_C_J, RVC_MATCH_C_J)
>  __RISCV_INSN_FUNCS(beq, RVG_MASK_BEQ, RVG_MATCH_BEQ)
>  __RISCV_INSN_FUNCS(bne, RVG_MASK_BNE, RVG_MATCH_BNE)
> @@ -273,6 +272,18 @@ static __always_inline bool riscv_insn_is_branch(u32 code)
>  	return (code & RV_INSN_OPCODE_MASK) == RVG_OPCODE_BRANCH;
>  }
>  
> +static __always_inline bool riscv_insn_is_c_jr(u32 code)
> +{
> +	return (code & RVC_MASK_C_JR) == RVC_MATCH_C_JR &&
> +	       (code & RVC_INSN_J_RS1_MASK) != 0;
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline bool riscv_insn_is_c_jalr(u32 code)
> +{
> +	return (code & RVC_MASK_C_JALR) == RVC_MATCH_C_JALR &&
> +	       (code & RVC_INSN_J_RS1_MASK) != 0;
> +}
> +

Nice one!

In the future, add a Fixes-tag for these kind of changes!
Fixes: ec5f90877516 ("RISC-V: Move riscv_insn_is_* macros into a common header")

(No need for a respin, b4 will pick up the Fixes above.)


Björn
Nam Cao Aug. 14, 2023, 2:03 p.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 02:07:50PM +0200, Björn Töpel wrote:
> In the future, add a Fixes-tag for these kind of changes!
> Fixes: ec5f90877516 ("RISC-V: Move riscv_insn_is_* macros into a common header")
> 
> (No need for a respin, b4 will pick up the Fixes above.)

Thanks! I will keep that in mind in the future.

Best regards,
Nam
patchwork-bot+linux-riscv@kernel.org Aug. 17, 2023, 3:20 p.m. UTC | #4
Hello:

This patch was applied to riscv/linux.git (fixes)
by Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>:

On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 20:39:25 +0200 you wrote:
> The instructions c.jr and c.jalr must have rs1 != 0, but
> riscv_insn_is_c_jr() and riscv_insn_is_c_jalr() do not check for this. So,
> riscv_insn_is_c_jr() can match a reserved encoding, while
> riscv_insn_is_c_jalr() can match the c.ebreak instruction.
> 
> Rewrite them with check for rs1 != 0.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - riscv: correct riscv_insn_is_c_jr() and riscv_insn_is_c_jalr()
    https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/79bc3f85c51f

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/insn.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/insn.h
index 4e1505cef8aa..fce00400c9bc 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/insn.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/insn.h
@@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ 
 #define RVC_INSN_FUNCT4_OPOFF	12
 #define RVC_INSN_FUNCT3_MASK	GENMASK(15, 13)
 #define RVC_INSN_FUNCT3_OPOFF	13
+#define RVC_INSN_J_RS1_MASK	GENMASK(11, 7)
 #define RVC_INSN_J_RS2_MASK	GENMASK(6, 2)
 #define RVC_INSN_OPCODE_MASK	GENMASK(1, 0)
 #define RVC_ENCODE_FUNCT3(f_)	(RVC_FUNCT3_##f_ << RVC_INSN_FUNCT3_OPOFF)
@@ -245,8 +246,6 @@  __RISCV_INSN_FUNCS(c_jal, RVC_MASK_C_JAL, RVC_MATCH_C_JAL)
 __RISCV_INSN_FUNCS(auipc, RVG_MASK_AUIPC, RVG_MATCH_AUIPC)
 __RISCV_INSN_FUNCS(jalr, RVG_MASK_JALR, RVG_MATCH_JALR)
 __RISCV_INSN_FUNCS(jal, RVG_MASK_JAL, RVG_MATCH_JAL)
-__RISCV_INSN_FUNCS(c_jr, RVC_MASK_C_JR, RVC_MATCH_C_JR)
-__RISCV_INSN_FUNCS(c_jalr, RVC_MASK_C_JALR, RVC_MATCH_C_JALR)
 __RISCV_INSN_FUNCS(c_j, RVC_MASK_C_J, RVC_MATCH_C_J)
 __RISCV_INSN_FUNCS(beq, RVG_MASK_BEQ, RVG_MATCH_BEQ)
 __RISCV_INSN_FUNCS(bne, RVG_MASK_BNE, RVG_MATCH_BNE)
@@ -273,6 +272,18 @@  static __always_inline bool riscv_insn_is_branch(u32 code)
 	return (code & RV_INSN_OPCODE_MASK) == RVG_OPCODE_BRANCH;
 }
 
+static __always_inline bool riscv_insn_is_c_jr(u32 code)
+{
+	return (code & RVC_MASK_C_JR) == RVC_MATCH_C_JR &&
+	       (code & RVC_INSN_J_RS1_MASK) != 0;
+}
+
+static __always_inline bool riscv_insn_is_c_jalr(u32 code)
+{
+	return (code & RVC_MASK_C_JALR) == RVC_MATCH_C_JALR &&
+	       (code & RVC_INSN_J_RS1_MASK) != 0;
+}
+
 #define RV_IMM_SIGN(x) (-(((x) >> 31) & 1))
 #define RVC_IMM_SIGN(x) (-(((x) >> 12) & 1))
 #define RV_X(X, s, mask)  (((X) >> (s)) & (mask))