diff mbox series

[RFC/RFT,1/4] riscv: Stop emitting preventive sfence.vma for new vmalloc mappings

Message ID 20231207150348.82096-2-alexghiti@rivosinc.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Headers show
Series Remove preventive sfence.vma | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
conchuod/vmtest-fixes-PR fail merge-conflict

Commit Message

Alexandre Ghiti Dec. 7, 2023, 3:03 p.m. UTC
In 6.5, we removed the vmalloc fault path because that can't work (see
[1] [2]). Then in order to make sure that new page table entries were
seen by the page table walker, we had to preventively emit a sfence.vma
on all harts [3] but this solution is very costly since it relies on IPI.

And even there, we could end up in a loop of vmalloc faults if a vmalloc
allocation is done in the IPI path (for example if it is traced, see
[4]), which could result in a kernel stack overflow.

Those preventive sfence.vma needed to be emitted because:

- if the uarch caches invalid entries, the new mapping may not be
  observed by the page table walker and an invalidation may be needed.
- if the uarch does not cache invalid entries, a reordered access
  could "miss" the new mapping and traps: in that case, we would actually
  only need to retry the access, no sfence.vma is required.

So this patch removes those preventive sfence.vma and actually handles
the possible (and unlikely) exceptions. And since the kernel stacks
mappings lie in the vmalloc area, this handling must be done very early
when the trap is taken, at the very beginning of handle_exception: this
also rules out the vmalloc allocations in the fault path.

Note that for now, we emit a sfence.vma even for uarchs that do not
cache invalid entries as we have no means to know that: that will be
fixed in the next patch.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20230531093817.665799-1-bjorn@kernel.org/ [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20230801090927.2018653-1-dylan@andestech.com [2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20230725132246.817726-1-alexghiti@rivosinc.com/ [3]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200508144043.13893-1-joro@8bytes.org/ [4]
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h  | 19 +++++-
 arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h |  5 ++
 arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c      |  5 ++
 arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S            | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/riscv/mm/init.c                 |  2 +
 5 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Christophe Leroy Dec. 7, 2023, 3:52 p.m. UTC | #1
Le 07/12/2023 à 16:03, Alexandre Ghiti a écrit :
> In 6.5, we removed the vmalloc fault path because that can't work (see
> [1] [2]). Then in order to make sure that new page table entries were
> seen by the page table walker, we had to preventively emit a sfence.vma
> on all harts [3] but this solution is very costly since it relies on IPI.
> 
> And even there, we could end up in a loop of vmalloc faults if a vmalloc
> allocation is done in the IPI path (for example if it is traced, see
> [4]), which could result in a kernel stack overflow.
> 
> Those preventive sfence.vma needed to be emitted because:
> 
> - if the uarch caches invalid entries, the new mapping may not be
>    observed by the page table walker and an invalidation may be needed.
> - if the uarch does not cache invalid entries, a reordered access
>    could "miss" the new mapping and traps: in that case, we would actually
>    only need to retry the access, no sfence.vma is required.
> 
> So this patch removes those preventive sfence.vma and actually handles
> the possible (and unlikely) exceptions. And since the kernel stacks
> mappings lie in the vmalloc area, this handling must be done very early
> when the trap is taken, at the very beginning of handle_exception: this
> also rules out the vmalloc allocations in the fault path.
> 
> Note that for now, we emit a sfence.vma even for uarchs that do not
> cache invalid entries as we have no means to know that: that will be
> fixed in the next patch.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20230531093817.665799-1-bjorn@kernel.org/ [1]
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20230801090927.2018653-1-dylan@andestech.com [2]
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20230725132246.817726-1-alexghiti@rivosinc.com/ [3]
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200508144043.13893-1-joro@8bytes.org/ [4]
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
> ---
>   arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h  | 19 +++++-
>   arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h |  5 ++
>   arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c      |  5 ++
>   arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S            | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   arch/riscv/mm/init.c                 |  2 +
>   5 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h
> index 3cb53c4df27c..a916cbc69d47 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h
> @@ -37,7 +37,24 @@ static inline void flush_dcache_page(struct page *page)
>   	flush_icache_mm(vma->vm_mm, 0)
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> -#define flush_cache_vmap(start, end)	flush_tlb_kernel_range(start, end)
> +extern u64 new_vmalloc[];

Can you have the table size here ? Would help GCC static analysis for 
boundary checking.

> +extern char _end[];
> +#define flush_cache_vmap flush_cache_vmap
> +static inline void flush_cache_vmap(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> +{
> +	if ((start < VMALLOC_END && end > VMALLOC_START) ||
> +	    (start < MODULES_END && end > MODULES_VADDR)) {

Can you use is_vmalloc_or_module_addr() instead ?


> +		int i;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * We don't care if concurrently a cpu resets this value since
> +		 * the only place this can happen is in handle_exception() where
> +		 * an sfence.vma is emitted.
> +		 */
> +		for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS / sizeof(u64) + 1; ++i)

Use ARRAY_SIZE() ?

> +			new_vmalloc[i] = -1ULL;
> +	}
> +}
>   #endif
>   
>   #ifndef CONFIG_SMP
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
> index 1833beb00489..8fe12fa6c329 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
> @@ -60,6 +60,11 @@ struct thread_info {
>   	long			user_sp;	/* User stack pointer */
>   	int			cpu;
>   	unsigned long		syscall_work;	/* SYSCALL_WORK_ flags */
> +	/*
> +	 * Used in handle_exception() to save a0, a1 and a2 before knowing if we
> +	 * can access the kernel stack.
> +	 */
> +	unsigned long		a0, a1, a2;
>   };
>   
>   /*
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> index d6a75aac1d27..340c1c84560d 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> @@ -34,10 +34,15 @@ void asm_offsets(void)
>   	OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_S9, task_struct, thread.s[9]);
>   	OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_S10, task_struct, thread.s[10]);
>   	OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_S11, task_struct, thread.s[11]);
> +
> +	OFFSET(TASK_TI_CPU, task_struct, thread_info.cpu);
>   	OFFSET(TASK_TI_FLAGS, task_struct, thread_info.flags);
>   	OFFSET(TASK_TI_PREEMPT_COUNT, task_struct, thread_info.preempt_count);
>   	OFFSET(TASK_TI_KERNEL_SP, task_struct, thread_info.kernel_sp);
>   	OFFSET(TASK_TI_USER_SP, task_struct, thread_info.user_sp);
> +	OFFSET(TASK_TI_A0, task_struct, thread_info.a0);
> +	OFFSET(TASK_TI_A1, task_struct, thread_info.a1);
> +	OFFSET(TASK_TI_A2, task_struct, thread_info.a2);
>   
>   	OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F0,  task_struct, thread.fstate.f[0]);
>   	OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F1,  task_struct, thread.fstate.f[1]);
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> index 143a2bb3e697..3a3c7b563816 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> @@ -14,6 +14,88 @@
>   #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
>   #include <asm/errata_list.h>
>   
> +.macro new_vmalloc_check
> +	REG_S 	a0, TASK_TI_A0(tp)
> +	REG_S 	a1, TASK_TI_A1(tp)
> +	REG_S	a2, TASK_TI_A2(tp)
> +
> +	csrr 	a0, CSR_CAUSE
> +	/* Exclude IRQs */
> +	blt  	a0, zero, _new_vmalloc_restore_context
> +	/* Only check new_vmalloc if we are in page/protection fault */
> +	li   	a1, EXC_LOAD_PAGE_FAULT
> +	beq  	a0, a1, _new_vmalloc_kernel_address
> +	li   	a1, EXC_STORE_PAGE_FAULT
> +	beq  	a0, a1, _new_vmalloc_kernel_address
> +	li   	a1, EXC_INST_PAGE_FAULT
> +	bne  	a0, a1, _new_vmalloc_restore_context
> +
> +_new_vmalloc_kernel_address:
> +	/* Is it a kernel address? */
> +	csrr 	a0, CSR_TVAL
> +	bge 	a0, zero, _new_vmalloc_restore_context
> +
> +	/* Check if a new vmalloc mapping appeared that could explain the trap */
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Computes:
> +	 * a0 = &new_vmalloc[BIT_WORD(cpu)]
> +	 * a1 = BIT_MASK(cpu)
> +	 */
> +	REG_L 	a2, TASK_TI_CPU(tp)
> +	/*
> +	 * Compute the new_vmalloc element position:
> +	 * (cpu / 64) * 8 = (cpu >> 6) << 3
> +	 */
> +	srli	a1, a2, 6
> +	slli	a1, a1, 3
> +	la	a0, new_vmalloc
> +	add	a0, a0, a1
> +	/*
> +	 * Compute the bit position in the new_vmalloc element:
> +	 * bit_pos = cpu % 64 = cpu - (cpu / 64) * 64 = cpu - (cpu >> 6) << 6
> +	 * 	   = cpu - ((cpu >> 6) << 3) << 3
> +	 */
> +	slli	a1, a1, 3
> +	sub	a1, a2, a1
> +	/* Compute the "get mask": 1 << bit_pos */
> +	li	a2, 1
> +	sll	a1, a2, a1
> +
> +	/* Check the value of new_vmalloc for this cpu */
> +	ld	a2, 0(a0)
> +	and	a2, a2, a1
> +	beq	a2, zero, _new_vmalloc_restore_context
> +
> +	ld	a2, 0(a0)
> +	not	a1, a1
> +	and	a1, a2, a1
> +	sd	a1, 0(a0)
> +
> +	/* Only emit a sfence.vma if the uarch caches invalid entries */
> +	la	a0, tlb_caching_invalid_entries
> +	lb	a0, 0(a0)
> +	beqz	a0, _new_vmalloc_no_caching_invalid_entries
> +	sfence.vma
> +_new_vmalloc_no_caching_invalid_entries:
> +	// debug
> +	la	a0, nr_sfence_vma_handle_exception
> +	li	a1, 1
> +	amoadd.w    a0, a1, (a0)
> +	// end debug
> +	REG_L	a0, TASK_TI_A0(tp)
> +	REG_L	a1, TASK_TI_A1(tp)
> +	REG_L	a2, TASK_TI_A2(tp)
> +	csrw	CSR_SCRATCH, x0
> +	sret
> +
> +_new_vmalloc_restore_context:
> +	REG_L	a0, TASK_TI_A0(tp)
> +	REG_L 	a1, TASK_TI_A1(tp)
> +	REG_L 	a2, TASK_TI_A2(tp)
> +.endm
> +
> +
>   SYM_CODE_START(handle_exception)
>   	/*
>   	 * If coming from userspace, preserve the user thread pointer and load
> @@ -25,6 +107,18 @@ SYM_CODE_START(handle_exception)
>   
>   _restore_kernel_tpsp:
>   	csrr tp, CSR_SCRATCH
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The RISC-V kernel does not eagerly emit a sfence.vma after each
> +	 * new vmalloc mapping, which may result in exceptions:
> +	 * - if the uarch caches invalid entries, the new mapping would not be
> +	 *   observed by the page table walker and an invalidation is needed.
> +	 * - if the uarch does not cache invalid entries, a reordered access
> +	 *   could "miss" the new mapping and traps: in that case, we only need
> +	 *   to retry the access, no sfence.vma is required.
> +	 */
> +	new_vmalloc_check
> +
>   	REG_S sp, TASK_TI_KERNEL_SP(tp)
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_VMAP_STACK
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> index 0798bd861dcb..379403de6c6f 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,8 @@
>   
>   #include "../kernel/head.h"
>   
> +u64 new_vmalloc[NR_CPUS / sizeof(u64) + 1];
> +
>   struct kernel_mapping kernel_map __ro_after_init;
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_map);
>   #ifdef CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL
Alexandre Ghiti Dec. 8, 2023, 2:28 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Christophe,

On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 4:52 PM Christophe Leroy
<christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> wrote:
>
>
>
> Le 07/12/2023 à 16:03, Alexandre Ghiti a écrit :
> > In 6.5, we removed the vmalloc fault path because that can't work (see
> > [1] [2]). Then in order to make sure that new page table entries were
> > seen by the page table walker, we had to preventively emit a sfence.vma
> > on all harts [3] but this solution is very costly since it relies on IPI.
> >
> > And even there, we could end up in a loop of vmalloc faults if a vmalloc
> > allocation is done in the IPI path (for example if it is traced, see
> > [4]), which could result in a kernel stack overflow.
> >
> > Those preventive sfence.vma needed to be emitted because:
> >
> > - if the uarch caches invalid entries, the new mapping may not be
> >    observed by the page table walker and an invalidation may be needed.
> > - if the uarch does not cache invalid entries, a reordered access
> >    could "miss" the new mapping and traps: in that case, we would actually
> >    only need to retry the access, no sfence.vma is required.
> >
> > So this patch removes those preventive sfence.vma and actually handles
> > the possible (and unlikely) exceptions. And since the kernel stacks
> > mappings lie in the vmalloc area, this handling must be done very early
> > when the trap is taken, at the very beginning of handle_exception: this
> > also rules out the vmalloc allocations in the fault path.
> >
> > Note that for now, we emit a sfence.vma even for uarchs that do not
> > cache invalid entries as we have no means to know that: that will be
> > fixed in the next patch.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20230531093817.665799-1-bjorn@kernel.org/ [1]
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20230801090927.2018653-1-dylan@andestech.com [2]
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20230725132246.817726-1-alexghiti@rivosinc.com/ [3]
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200508144043.13893-1-joro@8bytes.org/ [4]
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
> > ---
> >   arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h  | 19 +++++-
> >   arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h |  5 ++
> >   arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c      |  5 ++
> >   arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S            | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   arch/riscv/mm/init.c                 |  2 +
> >   5 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h
> > index 3cb53c4df27c..a916cbc69d47 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h
> > @@ -37,7 +37,24 @@ static inline void flush_dcache_page(struct page *page)
> >       flush_icache_mm(vma->vm_mm, 0)
> >
> >   #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> > -#define flush_cache_vmap(start, end) flush_tlb_kernel_range(start, end)
> > +extern u64 new_vmalloc[];
>
> Can you have the table size here ? Would help GCC static analysis for
> boundary checking.

Yes, I'll do

>
> > +extern char _end[];
> > +#define flush_cache_vmap flush_cache_vmap
> > +static inline void flush_cache_vmap(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> > +{
> > +     if ((start < VMALLOC_END && end > VMALLOC_START) ||
> > +         (start < MODULES_END && end > MODULES_VADDR)) {
>
> Can you use is_vmalloc_or_module_addr() instead ?

Yes, I'll do

>
>
> > +             int i;
> > +
> > +             /*
> > +              * We don't care if concurrently a cpu resets this value since
> > +              * the only place this can happen is in handle_exception() where
> > +              * an sfence.vma is emitted.
> > +              */
> > +             for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS / sizeof(u64) + 1; ++i)
>
> Use ARRAY_SIZE() ?

And that too :)

Thanks for the review,

Alex

>
> > +                     new_vmalloc[i] = -1ULL;
> > +     }
> > +}
> >   #endif
> >
> >   #ifndef CONFIG_SMP
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
> > index 1833beb00489..8fe12fa6c329 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
> > @@ -60,6 +60,11 @@ struct thread_info {
> >       long                    user_sp;        /* User stack pointer */
> >       int                     cpu;
> >       unsigned long           syscall_work;   /* SYSCALL_WORK_ flags */
> > +     /*
> > +      * Used in handle_exception() to save a0, a1 and a2 before knowing if we
> > +      * can access the kernel stack.
> > +      */
> > +     unsigned long           a0, a1, a2;
> >   };
> >
> >   /*
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> > index d6a75aac1d27..340c1c84560d 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> > @@ -34,10 +34,15 @@ void asm_offsets(void)
> >       OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_S9, task_struct, thread.s[9]);
> >       OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_S10, task_struct, thread.s[10]);
> >       OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_S11, task_struct, thread.s[11]);
> > +
> > +     OFFSET(TASK_TI_CPU, task_struct, thread_info.cpu);
> >       OFFSET(TASK_TI_FLAGS, task_struct, thread_info.flags);
> >       OFFSET(TASK_TI_PREEMPT_COUNT, task_struct, thread_info.preempt_count);
> >       OFFSET(TASK_TI_KERNEL_SP, task_struct, thread_info.kernel_sp);
> >       OFFSET(TASK_TI_USER_SP, task_struct, thread_info.user_sp);
> > +     OFFSET(TASK_TI_A0, task_struct, thread_info.a0);
> > +     OFFSET(TASK_TI_A1, task_struct, thread_info.a1);
> > +     OFFSET(TASK_TI_A2, task_struct, thread_info.a2);
> >
> >       OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F0,  task_struct, thread.fstate.f[0]);
> >       OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F1,  task_struct, thread.fstate.f[1]);
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> > index 143a2bb3e697..3a3c7b563816 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> > @@ -14,6 +14,88 @@
> >   #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
> >   #include <asm/errata_list.h>
> >
> > +.macro new_vmalloc_check
> > +     REG_S   a0, TASK_TI_A0(tp)
> > +     REG_S   a1, TASK_TI_A1(tp)
> > +     REG_S   a2, TASK_TI_A2(tp)
> > +
> > +     csrr    a0, CSR_CAUSE
> > +     /* Exclude IRQs */
> > +     blt     a0, zero, _new_vmalloc_restore_context
> > +     /* Only check new_vmalloc if we are in page/protection fault */
> > +     li      a1, EXC_LOAD_PAGE_FAULT
> > +     beq     a0, a1, _new_vmalloc_kernel_address
> > +     li      a1, EXC_STORE_PAGE_FAULT
> > +     beq     a0, a1, _new_vmalloc_kernel_address
> > +     li      a1, EXC_INST_PAGE_FAULT
> > +     bne     a0, a1, _new_vmalloc_restore_context
> > +
> > +_new_vmalloc_kernel_address:
> > +     /* Is it a kernel address? */
> > +     csrr    a0, CSR_TVAL
> > +     bge     a0, zero, _new_vmalloc_restore_context
> > +
> > +     /* Check if a new vmalloc mapping appeared that could explain the trap */
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * Computes:
> > +      * a0 = &new_vmalloc[BIT_WORD(cpu)]
> > +      * a1 = BIT_MASK(cpu)
> > +      */
> > +     REG_L   a2, TASK_TI_CPU(tp)
> > +     /*
> > +      * Compute the new_vmalloc element position:
> > +      * (cpu / 64) * 8 = (cpu >> 6) << 3
> > +      */
> > +     srli    a1, a2, 6
> > +     slli    a1, a1, 3
> > +     la      a0, new_vmalloc
> > +     add     a0, a0, a1
> > +     /*
> > +      * Compute the bit position in the new_vmalloc element:
> > +      * bit_pos = cpu % 64 = cpu - (cpu / 64) * 64 = cpu - (cpu >> 6) << 6
> > +      *         = cpu - ((cpu >> 6) << 3) << 3
> > +      */
> > +     slli    a1, a1, 3
> > +     sub     a1, a2, a1
> > +     /* Compute the "get mask": 1 << bit_pos */
> > +     li      a2, 1
> > +     sll     a1, a2, a1
> > +
> > +     /* Check the value of new_vmalloc for this cpu */
> > +     ld      a2, 0(a0)
> > +     and     a2, a2, a1
> > +     beq     a2, zero, _new_vmalloc_restore_context
> > +
> > +     ld      a2, 0(a0)
> > +     not     a1, a1
> > +     and     a1, a2, a1
> > +     sd      a1, 0(a0)
> > +
> > +     /* Only emit a sfence.vma if the uarch caches invalid entries */
> > +     la      a0, tlb_caching_invalid_entries
> > +     lb      a0, 0(a0)
> > +     beqz    a0, _new_vmalloc_no_caching_invalid_entries
> > +     sfence.vma
> > +_new_vmalloc_no_caching_invalid_entries:
> > +     // debug
> > +     la      a0, nr_sfence_vma_handle_exception
> > +     li      a1, 1
> > +     amoadd.w    a0, a1, (a0)
> > +     // end debug
> > +     REG_L   a0, TASK_TI_A0(tp)
> > +     REG_L   a1, TASK_TI_A1(tp)
> > +     REG_L   a2, TASK_TI_A2(tp)
> > +     csrw    CSR_SCRATCH, x0
> > +     sret
> > +
> > +_new_vmalloc_restore_context:
> > +     REG_L   a0, TASK_TI_A0(tp)
> > +     REG_L   a1, TASK_TI_A1(tp)
> > +     REG_L   a2, TASK_TI_A2(tp)
> > +.endm
> > +
> > +
> >   SYM_CODE_START(handle_exception)
> >       /*
> >        * If coming from userspace, preserve the user thread pointer and load
> > @@ -25,6 +107,18 @@ SYM_CODE_START(handle_exception)
> >
> >   _restore_kernel_tpsp:
> >       csrr tp, CSR_SCRATCH
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * The RISC-V kernel does not eagerly emit a sfence.vma after each
> > +      * new vmalloc mapping, which may result in exceptions:
> > +      * - if the uarch caches invalid entries, the new mapping would not be
> > +      *   observed by the page table walker and an invalidation is needed.
> > +      * - if the uarch does not cache invalid entries, a reordered access
> > +      *   could "miss" the new mapping and traps: in that case, we only need
> > +      *   to retry the access, no sfence.vma is required.
> > +      */
> > +     new_vmalloc_check
> > +
> >       REG_S sp, TASK_TI_KERNEL_SP(tp)
> >
> >   #ifdef CONFIG_VMAP_STACK
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> > index 0798bd861dcb..379403de6c6f 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> > @@ -36,6 +36,8 @@
> >
> >   #include "../kernel/head.h"
> >
> > +u64 new_vmalloc[NR_CPUS / sizeof(u64) + 1];
> > +
> >   struct kernel_mapping kernel_map __ro_after_init;
> >   EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_map);
> >   #ifdef CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h
index 3cb53c4df27c..a916cbc69d47 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h
@@ -37,7 +37,24 @@  static inline void flush_dcache_page(struct page *page)
 	flush_icache_mm(vma->vm_mm, 0)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
-#define flush_cache_vmap(start, end)	flush_tlb_kernel_range(start, end)
+extern u64 new_vmalloc[];
+extern char _end[];
+#define flush_cache_vmap flush_cache_vmap
+static inline void flush_cache_vmap(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
+{
+	if ((start < VMALLOC_END && end > VMALLOC_START) ||
+	    (start < MODULES_END && end > MODULES_VADDR)) {
+		int i;
+
+		/*
+		 * We don't care if concurrently a cpu resets this value since
+		 * the only place this can happen is in handle_exception() where
+		 * an sfence.vma is emitted.
+		 */
+		for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS / sizeof(u64) + 1; ++i)
+			new_vmalloc[i] = -1ULL;
+	}
+}
 #endif
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_SMP
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
index 1833beb00489..8fe12fa6c329 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -60,6 +60,11 @@  struct thread_info {
 	long			user_sp;	/* User stack pointer */
 	int			cpu;
 	unsigned long		syscall_work;	/* SYSCALL_WORK_ flags */
+	/*
+	 * Used in handle_exception() to save a0, a1 and a2 before knowing if we
+	 * can access the kernel stack.
+	 */
+	unsigned long		a0, a1, a2;
 };
 
 /*
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
index d6a75aac1d27..340c1c84560d 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
@@ -34,10 +34,15 @@  void asm_offsets(void)
 	OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_S9, task_struct, thread.s[9]);
 	OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_S10, task_struct, thread.s[10]);
 	OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_S11, task_struct, thread.s[11]);
+
+	OFFSET(TASK_TI_CPU, task_struct, thread_info.cpu);
 	OFFSET(TASK_TI_FLAGS, task_struct, thread_info.flags);
 	OFFSET(TASK_TI_PREEMPT_COUNT, task_struct, thread_info.preempt_count);
 	OFFSET(TASK_TI_KERNEL_SP, task_struct, thread_info.kernel_sp);
 	OFFSET(TASK_TI_USER_SP, task_struct, thread_info.user_sp);
+	OFFSET(TASK_TI_A0, task_struct, thread_info.a0);
+	OFFSET(TASK_TI_A1, task_struct, thread_info.a1);
+	OFFSET(TASK_TI_A2, task_struct, thread_info.a2);
 
 	OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F0,  task_struct, thread.fstate.f[0]);
 	OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F1,  task_struct, thread.fstate.f[1]);
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
index 143a2bb3e697..3a3c7b563816 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
@@ -14,6 +14,88 @@ 
 #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
 #include <asm/errata_list.h>
 
+.macro new_vmalloc_check
+	REG_S 	a0, TASK_TI_A0(tp)
+	REG_S 	a1, TASK_TI_A1(tp)
+	REG_S	a2, TASK_TI_A2(tp)
+
+	csrr 	a0, CSR_CAUSE
+	/* Exclude IRQs */
+	blt  	a0, zero, _new_vmalloc_restore_context
+	/* Only check new_vmalloc if we are in page/protection fault */
+	li   	a1, EXC_LOAD_PAGE_FAULT
+	beq  	a0, a1, _new_vmalloc_kernel_address
+	li   	a1, EXC_STORE_PAGE_FAULT
+	beq  	a0, a1, _new_vmalloc_kernel_address
+	li   	a1, EXC_INST_PAGE_FAULT
+	bne  	a0, a1, _new_vmalloc_restore_context
+
+_new_vmalloc_kernel_address:
+	/* Is it a kernel address? */
+	csrr 	a0, CSR_TVAL
+	bge 	a0, zero, _new_vmalloc_restore_context
+
+	/* Check if a new vmalloc mapping appeared that could explain the trap */
+
+	/*
+	 * Computes:
+	 * a0 = &new_vmalloc[BIT_WORD(cpu)]
+	 * a1 = BIT_MASK(cpu)
+	 */
+	REG_L 	a2, TASK_TI_CPU(tp)
+	/*
+	 * Compute the new_vmalloc element position:
+	 * (cpu / 64) * 8 = (cpu >> 6) << 3
+	 */
+	srli	a1, a2, 6
+	slli	a1, a1, 3
+	la	a0, new_vmalloc
+	add	a0, a0, a1
+	/*
+	 * Compute the bit position in the new_vmalloc element:
+	 * bit_pos = cpu % 64 = cpu - (cpu / 64) * 64 = cpu - (cpu >> 6) << 6
+	 * 	   = cpu - ((cpu >> 6) << 3) << 3
+	 */
+	slli	a1, a1, 3
+	sub	a1, a2, a1
+	/* Compute the "get mask": 1 << bit_pos */
+	li	a2, 1
+	sll	a1, a2, a1
+
+	/* Check the value of new_vmalloc for this cpu */
+	ld	a2, 0(a0)
+	and	a2, a2, a1
+	beq	a2, zero, _new_vmalloc_restore_context
+
+	ld	a2, 0(a0)
+	not	a1, a1
+	and	a1, a2, a1
+	sd	a1, 0(a0)
+
+	/* Only emit a sfence.vma if the uarch caches invalid entries */
+	la	a0, tlb_caching_invalid_entries
+	lb	a0, 0(a0)
+	beqz	a0, _new_vmalloc_no_caching_invalid_entries
+	sfence.vma
+_new_vmalloc_no_caching_invalid_entries:
+	// debug
+	la	a0, nr_sfence_vma_handle_exception
+	li	a1, 1
+	amoadd.w    a0, a1, (a0)
+	// end debug
+	REG_L	a0, TASK_TI_A0(tp)
+	REG_L	a1, TASK_TI_A1(tp)
+	REG_L	a2, TASK_TI_A2(tp)
+	csrw	CSR_SCRATCH, x0
+	sret
+
+_new_vmalloc_restore_context:
+	REG_L	a0, TASK_TI_A0(tp)
+	REG_L 	a1, TASK_TI_A1(tp)
+	REG_L 	a2, TASK_TI_A2(tp)
+.endm
+
+
 SYM_CODE_START(handle_exception)
 	/*
 	 * If coming from userspace, preserve the user thread pointer and load
@@ -25,6 +107,18 @@  SYM_CODE_START(handle_exception)
 
 _restore_kernel_tpsp:
 	csrr tp, CSR_SCRATCH
+
+	/*
+	 * The RISC-V kernel does not eagerly emit a sfence.vma after each
+	 * new vmalloc mapping, which may result in exceptions:
+	 * - if the uarch caches invalid entries, the new mapping would not be
+	 *   observed by the page table walker and an invalidation is needed.
+	 * - if the uarch does not cache invalid entries, a reordered access
+	 *   could "miss" the new mapping and traps: in that case, we only need
+	 *   to retry the access, no sfence.vma is required.
+	 */
+	new_vmalloc_check
+
 	REG_S sp, TASK_TI_KERNEL_SP(tp)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_VMAP_STACK
diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
index 0798bd861dcb..379403de6c6f 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
@@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ 
 
 #include "../kernel/head.h"
 
+u64 new_vmalloc[NR_CPUS / sizeof(u64) + 1];
+
 struct kernel_mapping kernel_map __ro_after_init;
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_map);
 #ifdef CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL