diff mbox series

[v6,10/13] KVM: selftests: Only do get/set tests on present blessed list

Message ID 859b1f9ec108ba897de2d5fd0c9c24a1aa32a8ef.1690273969.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Handled Elsewhere
Headers show
Series RISCV: Add KVM_GET_REG_LIST API | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
conchuod/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
conchuod/tree_selection success Guessed tree name to be for-next at HEAD 471aba2e4760
conchuod/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
conchuod/maintainers_pattern success MAINTAINERS pattern errors before the patch: 4 and now 4
conchuod/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
conchuod/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
conchuod/build_rv64_clang_allmodconfig success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
conchuod/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
conchuod/build_rv64_gcc_allmodconfig success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
conchuod/build_rv32_defconfig success Build OK
conchuod/dtb_warn_rv64 success Errors and warnings before: 3 this patch: 3
conchuod/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
conchuod/checkpatch fail ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_k210_defconfig success Build OK
conchuod/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_virt_defconfig success Build OK

Commit Message

Xu, Haibo1 July 25, 2023, 8:41 a.m. UTC 
Only do the get/set tests on present and blessed registers
since we don't know the capabilities of any new ones.

Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 29 ++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
index 43a919f2208f..2232620fb797 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
@@ -50,6 +50,10 @@  extern int vcpu_configs_n;
 	for_each_reg_filtered(i)						\
 		if (!find_reg(blessed_reg, blessed_n, reg_list->reg[i]))
 
+#define for_each_present_blessed_reg(i)						\
+	for_each_reg(i)								\
+		if (find_reg(blessed_reg, blessed_n, reg_list->reg[i]))
+
 static const char *config_name(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
 {
 	struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s;
@@ -183,6 +187,16 @@  static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
 		return;
 	}
 
+	for_each_sublist(c, s)
+		blessed_n += s->regs_n;
+	blessed_reg = calloc(blessed_n, sizeof(__u64));
+
+	n = 0;
+	for_each_sublist(c, s) {
+		for (i = 0; i < s->regs_n; ++i)
+			blessed_reg[n++] = s->regs[i];
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * We only test that we can get the register and then write back the
 	 * same value. Some registers may allow other values to be written
@@ -192,8 +206,11 @@  static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
 	 * be written need to have the other values tested, then we should
 	 * create a new set of tests for those in a new independent test
 	 * executable.
+	 *
+	 * Only do the get/set tests on present, blessed list registers,
+	 * since we don't know the capabilities of any new registers.
 	 */
-	for_each_reg(i) {
+	for_each_present_blessed_reg(i) {
 		uint8_t addr[2048 / 8];
 		struct kvm_one_reg reg = {
 			.id = reg_list->reg[i],
@@ -236,16 +253,6 @@  static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
 		}
 	}
 
-	for_each_sublist(c, s)
-		blessed_n += s->regs_n;
-	blessed_reg = calloc(blessed_n, sizeof(__u64));
-
-	n = 0;
-	for_each_sublist(c, s) {
-		for (i = 0; i < s->regs_n; ++i)
-			blessed_reg[n++] = s->regs[i];
-	}
-
 	for_each_new_reg(i)
 		++new_regs;