| Message ID | ff1c6771a67d660db94372ac9aaa40f51e5e0090.1716429371.git.zhouquan@iscas.ac.cn (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Handled Elsewhere |
| Headers | show |
| Series | RISC-V: KVM: Fix incorrect reg_subtype labels in kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_isa_ext function | expand |
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 10:13:34AM GMT, zhouquan@iscas.ac.cn wrote: > From: Quan Zhou <zhouquan@iscas.ac.cn> > > In the function kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_isa_ext, the original code > used incorrect reg_subtype labels KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_MULTI_EN/DIS. > These have been corrected to KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_MULTI_EN/DIS respectively. > Although they are numerically equivalent, the actual processing > will not result in errors, but it may lead to ambiguous code semantics. > > Signed-off-by: Quan Zhou <zhouquan@iscas.ac.cn> > --- > arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c > index c676275ea0a0..62874fbca29f 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c > @@ -724,9 +724,9 @@ static int kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_isa_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > switch (reg_subtype) { > case KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_SINGLE: > return riscv_vcpu_set_isa_ext_single(vcpu, reg_num, reg_val); > - case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_MULTI_EN: > + case KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_MULTI_EN: > return riscv_vcpu_set_isa_ext_multi(vcpu, reg_num, reg_val, true); > - case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_MULTI_DIS: > + case KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_MULTI_DIS: > return riscv_vcpu_set_isa_ext_multi(vcpu, reg_num, reg_val, false); > default: > return -ENOENT; > > base-commit: 29c73fc794c83505066ee6db893b2a83ac5fac63 > -- > 2.34.1 > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 7:43 AM <zhouquan@iscas.ac.cn> wrote: > > From: Quan Zhou <zhouquan@iscas.ac.cn> > > In the function kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_isa_ext, the original code > used incorrect reg_subtype labels KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_MULTI_EN/DIS. > These have been corrected to KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_MULTI_EN/DIS respectively. > Although they are numerically equivalent, the actual processing > will not result in errors, but it may lead to ambiguous code semantics. > > Signed-off-by: Quan Zhou <zhouquan@iscas.ac.cn> Queued this patch for Linux-6.10-rcX fixes. I have added an appropriate Fixes tag as well. Thanks, Anup > --- > arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c > index c676275ea0a0..62874fbca29f 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c > @@ -724,9 +724,9 @@ static int kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_isa_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > switch (reg_subtype) { > case KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_SINGLE: > return riscv_vcpu_set_isa_ext_single(vcpu, reg_num, reg_val); > - case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_MULTI_EN: > + case KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_MULTI_EN: > return riscv_vcpu_set_isa_ext_multi(vcpu, reg_num, reg_val, true); > - case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_MULTI_DIS: > + case KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_MULTI_DIS: > return riscv_vcpu_set_isa_ext_multi(vcpu, reg_num, reg_val, false); > default: > return -ENOENT; > > base-commit: 29c73fc794c83505066ee6db893b2a83ac5fac63 > -- > 2.34.1 >
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c index c676275ea0a0..62874fbca29f 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c @@ -724,9 +724,9 @@ static int kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_isa_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, switch (reg_subtype) { case KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_SINGLE: return riscv_vcpu_set_isa_ext_single(vcpu, reg_num, reg_val); - case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_MULTI_EN: + case KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_MULTI_EN: return riscv_vcpu_set_isa_ext_multi(vcpu, reg_num, reg_val, true); - case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_MULTI_DIS: + case KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_MULTI_DIS: return riscv_vcpu_set_isa_ext_multi(vcpu, reg_num, reg_val, false); default: return -ENOENT;