diff mbox series

[v8,1/6] dt-bindings: riscv: Add T-HEAD C908 compatible

Message ID tencent_A5B50F1D87711D625443361A3BF996042B09@qq.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series riscv: add initial support for Canaan Kendryte K230 | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
conchuod/vmtest-for-next-PR success PR summary
conchuod/patch-1-test-1 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/build_rv32_defconfig.sh
conchuod/patch-1-test-2 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/build_rv64_clang_allmodconfig.sh
conchuod/patch-1-test-3 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/build_rv64_gcc_allmodconfig.sh
conchuod/patch-1-test-4 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/build_rv64_nommu_k210_defconfig.sh
conchuod/patch-1-test-5 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/build_rv64_nommu_virt_defconfig.sh
conchuod/patch-1-test-6 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/checkpatch.sh
conchuod/patch-1-test-7 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/dtb_warn_rv64.sh
conchuod/patch-1-test-8 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/header_inline.sh
conchuod/patch-1-test-9 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/kdoc.sh
conchuod/patch-1-test-10 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/module_param.sh
conchuod/patch-1-test-11 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/verify_fixes.sh
conchuod/patch-1-test-12 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/verify_signedoff.sh

Commit Message

Yangyu Chen April 7, 2024, 1:29 a.m. UTC
The thead,c908 is a RISC-V CPU core from T-HEAD Semiconductor which used
in Canaan Kendryte K230 SoC.

Signed-off-by: Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski April 7, 2024, 4:01 p.m. UTC | #1
On 07/04/2024 03:29, Yangyu Chen wrote:
> The thead,c908 is a RISC-V CPU core from T-HEAD Semiconductor which used
> in Canaan Kendryte K230 SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>

Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
your patches on recent Linux kernel.

Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline), work on fork of kernel
(don't, instead use mainline) or you ignore some maintainers (really
don't). Just use b4 and everything should be fine, although remember
about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new patches to the patchset.

You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
a waste of time.

Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.


Best regards,
Krzysztof
Yangyu Chen April 7, 2024, 4:48 p.m. UTC | #2
> On Apr 8, 2024, at 00:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> On 07/04/2024 03:29, Yangyu Chen wrote:
>> The thead,c908 is a RISC-V CPU core from T-HEAD Semiconductor which used
>> in Canaan Kendryte K230 SoC.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>
> 
> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
> and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
> kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
> your patches on recent Linux kernel.
> 
> Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
> people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
> ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline), work on fork of kernel
> (don't, instead use mainline) or you ignore some maintainers (really
> don't). Just use b4 and everything should be fine, although remember
> about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new patches to the patchset.
> 
> You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
> tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
> a waste of time.
> 
> Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.
> 

Sorry for the trouble caused. I accidentally removed some CC from the git
send-email command in the v6 version of this series and sent the v7 and v8,
including lkml and linux-dt list. I just want to remove linux-gpio and
linux-clk list and the corresponding maintainer since I separate the patch
in the v7 revision. I will check it more carefully the next time.

Now, I have sent the patch v8 resend version.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/tencent_22BA0425B4DF1CA1713B62E4423C1BFBF809@qq.com/

Thanks,
Yangyu Chen

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
index d87dd50f1a4b..d067f2a468ee 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@  properties:
               - sifive,u74
               - sifive,u74-mc
               - thead,c906
+              - thead,c908
               - thead,c910
               - thead,c920
           - const: riscv