[v2,44/44] arm64,riscv,perf: Remove RCU_NONIDLE() usage

Commit Message

Peter Zijlstra Sept. 19, 2022, 10 a.m. UTC

The PM notifiers should no longer be ran with RCU disabled (per the
previous patches), as such this hack is no longer required either.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[e-mail]>
---
 drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c       |   11 +----------
 drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c |    8 +-------
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

Patch

--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
@@ -762,17 +762,8 @@  static void cpu_pm_pmu_setup(struct arm_
 		case CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED:
 			 /*
 			  * Restore and enable the counter.
-			  * armpmu_start() indirectly calls
-			  *
-			  * perf_event_update_userpage()
-			  *
-			  * that requires RCU read locking to be functional,
-			  * wrap the call within RCU_NONIDLE to make the
-			  * RCU subsystem aware this cpu is not idle from
-			  * an RCU perspective for the armpmu_start() call
-			  * duration.
 			  */
-			RCU_NONIDLE(armpmu_start(event, PERF_EF_RELOAD));
+			armpmu_start(event, PERF_EF_RELOAD);
 			break;
 		default:
 			break;
--- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
@@ -747,14 +747,8 @@  static int riscv_pm_pmu_notify(struct no
 		case CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED:
 			/*
 			 * Restore and enable the counter.
-			 *
-			 * Requires RCU read locking to be functional,
-			 * wrap the call within RCU_NONIDLE to make the
-			 * RCU subsystem aware this cpu is not idle from
-			 * an RCU perspective for the riscv_pmu_start() call
-			 * duration.
 			 */
-			RCU_NONIDLE(riscv_pmu_start(event, PERF_EF_RELOAD));
+			riscv_pmu_start(event, PERF_EF_RELOAD);
 			break;
 		default:
 			break;