Message ID | 20200615133242.24911-1-lars.povlsen@microchip.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Adding support for Microchip Sparx5 SoC | expand |
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 3:33 PM Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@microchip.com> wrote: > > This patch series adds support for Microchip Sparx5 SoC, the CPU > system of a advanced, TSN capable gigabit switch. The CPU is an armv8 > x 2 CPU core (A53). > > Although this is an ARM core, it shares some peripherals with the > Microsemi Ocelot MIPS SoC. I've picked up this version of the series into an arm/newsoc branch in the soc tree, except for the pinctrl patch that Linus Walleij already merged. I see you still have a few pending patches for other subsystems (spi, mmc) and I'm not sure what the status is for those and am dropping them for the moment. Once the bindings are accepted by the respective subsystem maintainers, please send any remaining DT patches as a follow-up to what I've already merged. Arnd
Arnd Bergmann writes: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 3:33 PM Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@microchip.com> wrote: >> >> This patch series adds support for Microchip Sparx5 SoC, the CPU >> system of a advanced, TSN capable gigabit switch. The CPU is an armv8 >> x 2 CPU core (A53). >> >> Although this is an ARM core, it shares some peripherals with the >> Microsemi Ocelot MIPS SoC. > > I've picked up this version of the series into an arm/newsoc branch in > the soc tree, > except for the pinctrl patch that Linus Walleij already merged. > Great! Thanks a lot for following up! > I see you still have a few pending patches for other subsystems (spi, mmc) > and I'm not sure what the status is for those and am dropping them for the > moment. > Yes, I had a question out for the SPI maintainer but did not get any feedback, so I was thinking just doing my own assumptions and refreshing the series - probably tomorrow. I also just bumped the MMC maintainer (Adrian) yesterday, as he did send a me an 'Acked-by', but it hasn't been merged it seems. > Once the bindings are accepted by the respective subsystem maintainers, > please send any remaining DT patches as a follow-up to what I've already > merged. > I'll try to work out the puzzle, might need to reach out directly to to determine whats missing. Later, ---Lars > Arnd