Message ID | 20210122074234.GA1074747@jade (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 156d02914b7d2d53bf047235991b12bd6cbd7d40 |
Headers | show |
Series | [GIT,PULL] OP-TEE driver fix for v5.11 | expand |
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 8:42 AM Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org> wrote: > for you to fetch changes up to dcb3b06d9c34f33a249f65c08805461fb0c4325b: > > tee: optee: replace might_sleep with cond_resched (2021-01-21 10:36:48 +0100) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Fix rcu_sched trace from OP-TEE invoke > > Replaces might_sleep() with a conditional call to cond_resched() > in order to avoid the rcu_sched trace in some corner cases. Hi Rouven, The bugfix looks correct in the sense that it fixes the issue, but it took me a while to understand what you actually try to do here because of the unusual way it's written as if (need_resched()) cond_resched(); which /looks/ like you are doing something fishy here. In the end I concluded that this was probably just a misunderstanding of what cond_resched() does. Can you replace it with a normal cond_resched() without the second need_resched() check and make sure this still works? cond_resched() by definition performs the check to ensure that rescheduling is needed, so unless you want to explicitly hide the might_sleep() in it from being seen, it's better to call that. Arnd
Hello: This pull request was applied to soc/soc.git (refs/heads/arm/fixes): On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 08:42:34 +0100 you wrote: > Hello arm-soc maintainers, > > Please pull this small patch taking care of a rcu_sched trace in some > corner cases when OP-TEE is invoked. > > Thanks, > Jens > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [GIT,PULL] OP-TEE driver fix for v5.11 https://git.kernel.org/soc/soc/c/156d02914b7d You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Hello: This pull request was applied to soc/soc.git (refs/heads/for-next): On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 08:42:34 +0100 you wrote: > Hello arm-soc maintainers, > > Please pull this small patch taking care of a rcu_sched trace in some > corner cases when OP-TEE is invoked. > > Thanks, > Jens > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [GIT,PULL] OP-TEE driver fix for v5.11 https://git.kernel.org/soc/soc/c/156d02914b7d You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Hi Arnd, Was this merged by mistake? You had some concerns about the need_resched() test. Thanks, Jens On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 12:00 AM <patchwork-bot+linux-soc@kernel.org> wrote: > > Hello: > > This pull request was applied to soc/soc.git (refs/heads/arm/fixes): > > On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 08:42:34 +0100 you wrote: > > Hello arm-soc maintainers, > > > > Please pull this small patch taking care of a rcu_sched trace in some > > corner cases when OP-TEE is invoked. > > > > Thanks, > > Jens > > > > [...] > > Here is the summary with links: > - [GIT,PULL] OP-TEE driver fix for v5.11 > https://git.kernel.org/soc/soc/c/156d02914b7d > > You are awesome, thank you! > -- > Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. > https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html > >
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 8:21 AM Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org> wrote: > > Was this merged by mistake? You had some concerns about the need_resched() test. > Indeed, thanks for noticing! Could you send a fixup to remove the need_resched() check after verifying that it works? Alternatively I can remove the patch I merged by accident and send my next pull request without it, but I'd prefer to avoid rebasing the fixes I merged later. Arnd
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:30 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 8:21 AM Jens Wiklander > <jens.wiklander@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > Was this merged by mistake? You had some concerns about the need_resched() test. > > > > Indeed, thanks for noticing! > > Could you send a fixup to remove the need_resched() check after verifying that > it works? Alternatively I can remove the patch I merged by accident and send > my next pull request without it, but I'd prefer to avoid rebasing the fixes I > merged later. I need to send out the fixes branch for upstream. As it was my mistake to merge the fix while complaining about it, and the it's also harmless, I'll leave the version I pulled now. It would be nice to get a follow-up in your pull request for v5.12 though. Arnd
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 9:22 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:30 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 8:21 AM Jens Wiklander > > <jens.wiklander@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > > Was this merged by mistake? You had some concerns about the need_resched() test. > > > > > > > Indeed, thanks for noticing! > > > > Could you send a fixup to remove the need_resched() check after verifying that > > it works? Alternatively I can remove the patch I merged by accident and send > > my next pull request without it, but I'd prefer to avoid rebasing the fixes I > > merged later. > > I need to send out the fixes branch for upstream. As it was my mistake to > merge the fix while complaining about it, and the it's also harmless, I'll > leave the version I pulled now. Thanks, it seems it takes a little time to get the updating patch verified. > > It would be nice to get a follow-up in your pull request for v5.12 though. I'll see to that. Thanks, Jens