Message ID | 20211018121324.GA2943530@jade (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 20f6d9586eee5734072886cf052b72807b0afc4c |
Headers | show |
Series | [GIT,PULL] OP-TEE FF-A for V5.16 | expand |
Hello: This pull request was applied to soc/soc.git (for-next) by Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>: On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 14:13:24 +0200 you wrote: > Hello arm-soc maintainers, > > Please pull these patches which adds support for FF-A [1] in the OP-TEE > driver. There's a bit of shuffling in the code where everyhting related to > the old SMC based ABI is moved to drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c, but there > should not be any changed in behavior for with the old ABI. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [GIT,PULL] OP-TEE FF-A for V5.16 https://git.kernel.org/soc/soc/c/20f6d9586eee You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 14:13:24 +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote: > Please pull these patches which adds support for FF-A [1] in the OP-TEE > driver. There's a bit of shuffling in the code where everyhting related to > the old SMC based ABI is moved to drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c, but there > should not be any changed in behavior for with the old ABI. > > Note that this is based on top of the recent fix 7f565d0ead26 ("tee: optee: > Fix missing devices unregister during optee_remove") which has already been > requested to be pulled. > > [...] Merged into arm/drivers, thanks! merge commit: 20f6d9586eee5734072886cf052b72807b0afc4c Arnd
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 2:13 PM Jens Wiklander
<jens.wiklander@linaro.org> wrote:
> optee: isolate smc abi
This one caused a randconfig build regression on 32-bit arm:
/git/arm-soc/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c:405:15: error: implicit
declaration of function 'page_to_section'
[-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
optee_page = page_to_phys(*pages) +
^
/git/arm-soc/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h:148:43: note: expanded from
macro 'page_to_phys'
#define page_to_phys(page) (__pfn_to_phys(page_to_pfn(page)))
^
/git/arm-soc/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h:52:21: note: expanded
from macro 'page_to_pfn'
#define page_to_pfn __page_to_pfn
^
/git/arm-soc/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h:35:14: note: expanded
from macro '__page_to_pfn'
int __sec = page_to_section(__pg); \
^
/git/arm-soc/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c:405:15: note: did you mean
'__nr_to_section'?
/git/arm-soc/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h:148:43: note: expanded from
macro 'page_to_phys'
#define page_to_phys(page) (__pfn_to_phys(page_to_pfn(page)))
^
/git/arm-soc/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h:52:21: note: expanded
from macro 'page_to_pfn'
#define page_to_pfn __page_to_pfn
^
/git/arm-soc/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h:35:14: note: expanded
from macro '__page_to_pfn'
int __sec = page_to_section(__pg); \
^
/git/arm-soc/include/linux/mmzone.h:1365:35: note: '__nr_to_section'
declared here
static inline struct mem_section *__nr_to_section(unsigned long nr)
I have not investigated it, but it's probably trivial. Can have a look
and send a fix to
soc@kernel.org?
Arnd