Message ID | d22513cc-c326-443c-982b-78adf755d3dc@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Queued |
Headers | show |
Series | [GIT,PULL] Amlogic drivers updates for v6.14 | expand |
Hi, On 06/01/2025 15:25, Neil Armstrong wrote: > Hi, > > Here's the final DT bindings change that will give 100% success in Amlogic > ARM64 & ARM64 DT Bindings checks, with the mmc-slot bindings change routed > via the MMC tree. Gentle ping, it doesn't seem you pulled this PR. Thanks, Neil > > Thanks, > Neil > > The following changes since commit 40384c840ea1944d7c5a392e8975ed088ecf0b37: > > Linux 6.13-rc1 (2024-12-01 14:28:56 -0800) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/amlogic/linux.git tags/amlogic-drivers-for-v6.14 > > for you to fetch changes up to 960a4140ade8f6ba44e78dc40b80bbf272027805: > > dt-bindings: soc: amlogic,meson-gx-hhi-sysctrl: Document the System Control registers found on early Meson SoC (2024-12-11 09:49:49 +0100) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Amlogic drivers changes for v6.14: > - Document the System Control registers found on early Meson SoC > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Neil Armstrong (1): > dt-bindings: soc: amlogic,meson-gx-hhi-sysctrl: Document the System Control registers found on early Meson SoC > > .../bindings/soc/amlogic/amlogic,meson-gx-hhi-sysctrl.yaml | 14 ++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) >
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025, at 16:23, Neil Armstrong wrote: > On 06/01/2025 15:25, Neil Armstrong wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Here's the final DT bindings change that will give 100% success in Amlogic >> ARM64 & ARM64 DT Bindings checks, with the mmc-slot bindings change routed >> via the MMC tree. > > Gentle ping, it doesn't seem you pulled this PR. Thanks for catching this, I had indeed missed it in my first pass through the backlog. When I first looked at the "drivers" branches, I decided to skip it and instead merge it into the soc/dt branch since it's just binding updates. I don't normally care which of the two (or both) the binding updates go through, but if the drivers don't depend on it, I pick soc/dt. When I later looked through the dts branches, I skipped over this because the subject said "drivers". I'm now in the second pass of looking at everything I skipped originally, and would have eventually caught it, but it does help to have you look at what I'm doing to ensure it doesn't get lost entirely. Arnd
Hi, On 16/01/2025 17:39, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2025, at 16:23, Neil Armstrong wrote: >> On 06/01/2025 15:25, Neil Armstrong wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Here's the final DT bindings change that will give 100% success in Amlogic >>> ARM64 & ARM64 DT Bindings checks, with the mmc-slot bindings change routed >>> via the MMC tree. >> >> Gentle ping, it doesn't seem you pulled this PR. > > Thanks for catching this, I had indeed missed it in my first pass > through the backlog. > > When I first looked at the "drivers" branches, I decided to skip > it and instead merge it into the soc/dt branch since it's just > binding updates. I don't normally care which of the two (or both) > the binding updates go through, but if the drivers don't depend > on it, I pick soc/dt. Yeah I was unsure which tree using, yeah next time I'll properly use the DT tree if there's no C changes. > > When I later looked through the dts branches, I skipped over this > because the subject said "drivers". I'm now in the second pass of > looking at everything I skipped originally, and would have > eventually caught it, but it does help to have you look at what > I'm doing to ensure it doesn't get lost entirely. You're welcome! Thanks, Neil > > Arnd