Message ID | 1538037450-18949-1-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | mt76x0: phy/rf fixups for PCIe | expand |
On 2018-09-27 10:37, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > This is RFC for now, especially I'm interesting if patch 3 and 4 > is direction we should go. > > This is on top of Lorenzo github mt7610ev5 branch. Looks good to me. Thanks, - Felix
> > On 2018-09-27 10:37, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > This is RFC for now, especially I'm interesting if patch 3 and 4 > > is direction we should go. > > > > This is on top of Lorenzo github mt7610ev5 branch. > Looks good to me. > > Thanks, > > - Felix Hi Stanislaw, I tested this series and it works fine, so feel free to add my 'tested-by' when you submit the patchset. I guess we should add a 'mt76_is_usb()' check in rf_rr()/rf_wr(), agree? Something like: @@ -111,7 +111,8 @@ static int rf_wr(struct mt76x02_dev *dev, u32 offset, u8 val) { - if (test_bit(MT76_STATE_MCU_RUNNING, &dev->mt76.state)) { + if (test_bit(MT76_STATE_MCU_RUNNING, &dev->mt76.state) && + mt76_is_usb(dev)) { struct mt76_reg_pair pair = { .reg = offset, .value = val, @@ -129,7 +130,8 @@ int ret; u32 val; - if (test_bit(MT76_STATE_MCU_RUNNING, &dev->mt76.state)) { + if (test_bit(MT76_STATE_MCU_RUNNING, &dev->mt76.state) && + mt76_is_usb(dev)) { struct mt76_reg_pair pair = { .reg = offset, }; Regards, Lorenzo