diff mbox

bcma: handle BCM43227

Message ID 1345277555-13013-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Rafał Miłecki Aug. 18, 2012, 8:12 a.m. UTC 
Signed-off-by: Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Jack <x6719620@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/bcma/host_pci.c |    1 +
 drivers/bcma/sprom.c    |    2 ++
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

Comments

John W. Linville Aug. 22, 2012, 6:13 p.m. UTC | #1 
What are the prerequisite patches for this one?  It seems to be based
on something other than wireless-next.

John

On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:12:35AM +0200, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote:
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Jack <x6719620@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/bcma/host_pci.c |    1 +
>  drivers/bcma/sprom.c    |    2 ++
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bcma/host_pci.c b/drivers/bcma/host_pci.c
> index f7b0af7..b6b4b5e 100644
> --- a/drivers/bcma/host_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/bcma/host_pci.c
> @@ -273,6 +273,7 @@ static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(bcma_pci_bridge_tbl) = {
>  	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4331) },
>  	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4353) },
>  	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4357) },
> +	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4358) },
>  	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4359) },
>  	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4727) },
>  	{ 0, },
> diff --git a/drivers/bcma/sprom.c b/drivers/bcma/sprom.c
> index 9ea4627..0d546b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/bcma/sprom.c
> +++ b/drivers/bcma/sprom.c
> @@ -507,7 +507,9 @@ static bool bcma_sprom_onchip_available(struct bcma_bus *bus)
>  		/* for these chips OTP is always available */
>  		present = true;
>  		break;
> +	case BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM43227:
>  	case BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM43228:
> +	case BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM43428:
>  		present = chip_status & BCMA_CC_CHIPST_43228_OTP_PRESENT;
>  		break;
>  	default:
> -- 
> 1.7.7
> 
>
Rafał Miłecki Aug. 23, 2012, 7:36 p.m. UTC | #2 
2012/8/22 John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>:
> What are the prerequisite patches for this one?  It seems to be based
> on something other than wireless-next.

Sorry for problem, please drop this. I'll double re-check and submit
version that applies.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/bcma/host_pci.c b/drivers/bcma/host_pci.c
index f7b0af7..b6b4b5e 100644
--- a/drivers/bcma/host_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/bcma/host_pci.c
@@ -273,6 +273,7 @@  static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(bcma_pci_bridge_tbl) = {
 	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4331) },
 	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4353) },
 	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4357) },
+	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4358) },
 	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4359) },
 	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4727) },
 	{ 0, },
diff --git a/drivers/bcma/sprom.c b/drivers/bcma/sprom.c
index 9ea4627..0d546b6 100644
--- a/drivers/bcma/sprom.c
+++ b/drivers/bcma/sprom.c
@@ -507,7 +507,9 @@  static bool bcma_sprom_onchip_available(struct bcma_bus *bus)
 		/* for these chips OTP is always available */
 		present = true;
 		break;
+	case BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM43227:
 	case BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM43228:
+	case BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM43428:
 		present = chip_status & BCMA_CC_CHIPST_43228_OTP_PRESENT;
 		break;
 	default: