Message ID | 1363307043-23771-1-git-send-email-greearb@candelatech.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable, archived |
Headers | show |
On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 17:24 -0700, greearb@candelatech.com wrote: > From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> > > I found another crash when deleting lots of virtual stations > in a congested environment. I think the problem is that > the ieee80211_mlme_notify_scan_completed could call > ieee80211_restart_sta_timer for a non-associated interface > that was about to be deleted. > > With the following patch I am unable to reproduce the > crash. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> > --- > v2: Be more selective: Still need to do sdata->work even > if not associated so that we *can* associate. > > :100644 100644 81e0619... da805e2... M net/mac80211/mlme.c > net/mac80211/mlme.c | 7 +++++-- > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/mac80211/mlme.c b/net/mac80211/mlme.c > index 81e0619..da805e2 100644 > --- a/net/mac80211/mlme.c > +++ b/net/mac80211/mlme.c > @@ -2935,11 +2935,14 @@ static void ieee80211_restart_sta_timer(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata) > > /* let's probe the connection once */ > flags = sdata->local->hw.flags; > - if (!(flags & IEEE80211_HW_CONNECTION_MONITOR)) > + if ((!(flags & IEEE80211_HW_CONNECTION_MONITOR)) && > + sdata->u.mgd.associated) You really didn't need those extra parentheses :-) > ieee80211_queue_work(&sdata->local->hw, > &sdata->u.mgd.monitor_work); > + > /* and do all the other regular work too */ > - ieee80211_queue_work(&sdata->local->hw, &sdata->work); > + if (ieee80211_sdata_running(sdata)) > + ieee80211_queue_work(&sdata->local->hw, &sdata->work); Overall, it seems that it would be safe to just check ieee80211_sdata_running() in the beginning of the function instead? Maybe you could also look at the ibss/mesh code and fix this issue for good? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 03/19/2013 01:21 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 17:24 -0700, greearb@candelatech.com wrote: >> From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> >> >> I found another crash when deleting lots of virtual stations >> in a congested environment. I think the problem is that >> the ieee80211_mlme_notify_scan_completed could call >> ieee80211_restart_sta_timer for a non-associated interface >> that was about to be deleted. >> >> With the following patch I am unable to reproduce the >> crash. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> >> --- >> v2: Be more selective: Still need to do sdata->work even >> if not associated so that we *can* associate. >> >> :100644 100644 81e0619... da805e2... M net/mac80211/mlme.c >> net/mac80211/mlme.c | 7 +++++-- >> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/net/mac80211/mlme.c b/net/mac80211/mlme.c >> index 81e0619..da805e2 100644 >> --- a/net/mac80211/mlme.c >> +++ b/net/mac80211/mlme.c >> @@ -2935,11 +2935,14 @@ static void ieee80211_restart_sta_timer(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata) >> >> /* let's probe the connection once */ >> flags = sdata->local->hw.flags; >> - if (!(flags & IEEE80211_HW_CONNECTION_MONITOR)) >> + if ((!(flags & IEEE80211_HW_CONNECTION_MONITOR)) && >> + sdata->u.mgd.associated) > > You really didn't need those extra parentheses :-) I like them :) ...never can remember if the ! operator takes precedence over &&, but can remove them... >> ieee80211_queue_work(&sdata->local->hw, >> &sdata->u.mgd.monitor_work); >> + >> /* and do all the other regular work too */ >> - ieee80211_queue_work(&sdata->local->hw, &sdata->work); >> + if (ieee80211_sdata_running(sdata)) >> + ieee80211_queue_work(&sdata->local->hw, &sdata->work); > > Overall, it seems that it would be safe to just check > ieee80211_sdata_running() in the beginning of the function instead? I'm not sure. I can look at the code closer tomorrow perhaps. > Maybe you could also look at the ibss/mesh code and fix this issue for > good? Will poke around in that as well, but I have no way to test it currently. Ben > > johannes >
diff --git a/net/mac80211/mlme.c b/net/mac80211/mlme.c index 81e0619..da805e2 100644 --- a/net/mac80211/mlme.c +++ b/net/mac80211/mlme.c @@ -2935,11 +2935,14 @@ static void ieee80211_restart_sta_timer(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata) /* let's probe the connection once */ flags = sdata->local->hw.flags; - if (!(flags & IEEE80211_HW_CONNECTION_MONITOR)) + if ((!(flags & IEEE80211_HW_CONNECTION_MONITOR)) && + sdata->u.mgd.associated) ieee80211_queue_work(&sdata->local->hw, &sdata->u.mgd.monitor_work); + /* and do all the other regular work too */ - ieee80211_queue_work(&sdata->local->hw, &sdata->work); + if (ieee80211_sdata_running(sdata)) + ieee80211_queue_work(&sdata->local->hw, &sdata->work); } }