@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ void rtw_wep_decrypt23a(struct rtw_adapter *padapter,
struct recv_frame *precvframe)
{
/* exclude ICV */
- u8 crc[4];
+ u32 actual_crc, expected_crc;
struct arc4context mycontext;
int length;
u32 keylength;
@@ -243,19 +243,14 @@ void rtw_wep_decrypt23a(struct rtw_adapter *padapter,
arcfour_encrypt(&mycontext, payload, payload, length);
/* calculate icv and compare the icv */
- *((u32 *)crc) = le32_to_cpu(getcrc32(payload, length - 4));
+ actual_crc = le32_to_cpu(getcrc32(payload, length - 4));
+ expected_crc = le32_to_cpu(get_unaligned_le32(&payload[length - 4]));
- if (crc[3] != payload[length - 1] || crc[2] != payload[length - 2] ||
- crc[1] != payload[length - 3] || crc[0] != payload[length - 4]) {
+ if (actual_crc != expected_crc) {
RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_security_c_, _drv_err_,
- ("rtw_wep_decrypt23a:icv error crc[3](%x)!= payload"
- "[length-1](%x) || crc[2](%x)!= payload[length-2](%x)"
- " || crc[1](%x)!= payload[length-3](%x) || crc[0](%x)"
- "!= payload[length-4](%x)\n",
- crc[3], payload[length - 1],
- crc[2], payload[length - 2],
- crc[1], payload[length - 3],
- crc[0], payload[length - 4]));
+ ("rtw_wep_decrypt23a:icv CRC mismatch: "
+ "actual: %08x, expected: %08x\n",
+ actual_crc, expected_crc));
}
}
@@ -702,7 +697,7 @@ int rtw_tkip_decrypt23a(struct rtw_adapter *padapter,
u32 pnh;
u8 rc4key[16];
u8 ttkey[16];
- u8 crc[4];
+ u32 actual_crc, expected_crc;
struct arc4context mycontext;
int length;
u32 prwskeylen;
@@ -757,11 +752,14 @@ int rtw_tkip_decrypt23a(struct rtw_adapter *padapter,
arcfour_init(&mycontext, rc4key, 16);
arcfour_encrypt(&mycontext, payload, payload, length);
- *((u32 *)crc) = le32_to_cpu(getcrc32(payload, length - 4));
+ actual_crc = le32_to_cpu(getcrc32(payload, length - 4));
+ expected_crc = le32_to_cpu(get_unaligned_le32(&payload[length - 4]));
- if (crc[3] != payload[length - 1] || crc[2] != payload[length - 2] || crc[1] != payload[length - 3] || crc[0] != payload[length - 4]) {
- RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_security_c_, _drv_err_, ("rtw_wep_decrypt23a:icv error crc[3](%x)!= payload[length-1](%x) || crc[2](%x)!= payload[length-2](%x) || crc[1](%x)!= payload[length-3](%x) || crc[0](%x)!= payload[length-4](%x)\n",
- crc[3], payload[length - 1], crc[2], payload[length - 2], crc[1], payload[length - 3], crc[0], payload[length - 4]));
+ if (actual_crc != expected_crc) {
+ RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_security_c_, _drv_err_,
+ ("rtw_wep_decrypt23a:icv CRC mismatch: "
+ "actual: %08x, expected: %08x\n",
+ actual_crc, expected_crc));
res = _FAIL;
}
Prior to this commit, rtl8723au's rtw_security.c had two instances of byte array comparisons (for CRC checks) where the individual elements of the byte arrays were compared one by one and an error trace would be output if the byte arrays were determined to be different. This commit improves the readability of the CRC verification by placing the individual 4 bytes of each byte array into an 32-bit unsigned integer and comparing the two resulting integers. Thanks to Larry Finger for spotting the code style issues in the previous version of this commit, and thanks to Joe Perches for suggesting the use of 32-bit integer comparisons instead of byte array comparisons. v2: Correct code style issues and compare 32-bit integers instead of byte arrays. Update the commit message to better reflect the nature of the changes. Signed-off-by: M. Vefa Bicakci <m.v.b@runbox.com> --- drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_security.c | 32 +++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)