diff mbox

mac80211: Fix FC masking in BIP AAD generation

Message ID 20120930164740.GA16910@w1.fi (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Jouni Malinen Sept. 30, 2012, 4:47 p.m. UTC
The bits used in the mask were off-by-one and ended up masking PwrMgt,
MoreData, Protected fields instead of Retry, PwrMgt, MoreData. Fix this
and to mask the correct fields. While doing so, convert the code to mask
the full FC using IEEE80211_FCTL_* defines similarly to how CCMP AAD is
built.

Since BIP is used only with broadcast/multicast management frames, the
Retry field is always 0 in these frames. The Protected field is also
zero to maintain backwards compatibility. As such, the incorrect mask
here does not really cause any problems for valid frames. In theory, an
invalid BIP frame with Retry or Protected field set to 1 could be
rejected because of BIP validation. However, no such frame should show
up with standard compliant implementations, so this does not cause
problems in normal BIP use.

Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
---
 net/mac80211/wpa.c |   11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

This incorrect mask value was reported to me through private email and I
have not received permission to add a Reported-by: tag, so I can only
credit the anonymous reporter here. Thanks!

Comments

Johannes Berg Oct. 1, 2012, 7:24 a.m. UTC | #1
On Sun, 2012-09-30 at 19:47 +0300, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> The bits used in the mask were off-by-one and ended up masking PwrMgt,
> MoreData, Protected fields instead of Retry, PwrMgt, MoreData. Fix this
> and to mask the correct fields. While doing so, convert the code to mask
> the full FC using IEEE80211_FCTL_* defines similarly to how CCMP AAD is
> built.
> 
> Since BIP is used only with broadcast/multicast management frames, the
> Retry field is always 0 in these frames. The Protected field is also
> zero to maintain backwards compatibility. As such, the incorrect mask
> here does not really cause any problems for valid frames. In theory, an
> invalid BIP frame with Retry or Protected field set to 1 could be
> rejected because of BIP validation. However, no such frame should show
> up with standard compliant implementations, so this does not cause
> problems in normal BIP use.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
> ---
>  net/mac80211/wpa.c |   11 ++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> This incorrect mask value was reported to me through private email and I
> have not received permission to add a Reported-by: tag, so I can only
> credit the anonymous reporter here. Thanks!

:-)

Applied, thanks!

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/net/mac80211/wpa.c b/net/mac80211/wpa.c
index bdb53ab..e58bf3f 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/wpa.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/wpa.c
@@ -545,14 +545,19 @@  ieee80211_crypto_ccmp_decrypt(struct ieee80211_rx_data *rx)
 
 static void bip_aad(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 *aad)
 {
+	__le16 mask_fc;
+	struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *) skb->data;
+
 	/* BIP AAD: FC(masked) || A1 || A2 || A3 */
 
 	/* FC type/subtype */
-	aad[0] = skb->data[0];
 	/* Mask FC Retry, PwrMgt, MoreData flags to zero */
-	aad[1] = skb->data[1] & ~(BIT(4) | BIT(5) | BIT(6));
+	mask_fc = hdr->frame_control;
+	mask_fc &= ~cpu_to_le16(IEEE80211_FCTL_RETRY | IEEE80211_FCTL_PM |
+				IEEE80211_FCTL_MOREDATA);
+	put_unaligned(mask_fc, (__le16 *) &aad[0]);
 	/* A1 || A2 || A3 */
-	memcpy(aad + 2, skb->data + 4, 3 * ETH_ALEN);
+	memcpy(aad + 2, &hdr->addr1, 3 * ETH_ALEN);
 }