@@ -1463,6 +1463,7 @@ void carl9170_op_tx(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
struct ar9170 *ar = hw->priv;
struct ieee80211_tx_info *info;
struct ieee80211_sta *sta = control->sta;
+ struct carl9170_sta_info *stai;
bool run;
if (unlikely(!IS_STARTED(ar)))
@@ -1479,10 +1480,8 @@ void carl9170_op_tx(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
* all ressouces which are associated with the frame.
*/
- if (sta) {
- struct carl9170_sta_info *stai = (void *) sta->drv_priv;
- atomic_inc(&stai->pending_frames);
- }
+ stai = (void *) sta->drv_priv;
+ atomic_inc(&stai->pending_frames);
if (info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU) {
run = carl9170_tx_ampdu_queue(ar, sta, skb);
The "sta" variable is not checked for NULL consistently and it makes the static checkers complain. I asked Christian Lamparter about this and it turns out the check is not needed. "In fact, in order to set up a ampdu session, the stack would call the driver's op_ampdu_action callback which always needs a station." I have removed the check. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html