@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ struct nfc_ops {
#define NFC_TARGET_IDX_ANY -1
#define NFC_MAX_GT_LEN 48
+#define NFC_MIN_GT_LEN 3
#define NFC_ATR_RES_GT_OFFSET 15
struct nfc_target {
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ int nfc_set_remote_general_bytes(struct nfc_dev *dev, u8 *gb, u8 gb_len)
{
pr_debug("dev_name=%s gb_len=%d\n", dev_name(&dev->dev), gb_len);
- if (gb_len > NFC_MAX_GT_LEN)
+ if (gb_len < NFC_MIN_GT_LEN || gb_len > NFC_MAX_GT_LEN)
return -EINVAL;
return nfc_llcp_set_remote_gb(dev, gb, gb_len);
@@ -547,8 +547,6 @@ int nfc_llcp_set_remote_gb(struct nfc_dev *dev, u8 *gb, u8 gb_len)
pr_err("No LLCP device\n");
return -ENODEV;
}
- if (gb_len < 3)
- return -EINVAL;
memset(local->remote_gb, 0, NFC_MAX_GT_LEN);
memcpy(local->remote_gb, gb, gb_len);
Szymon Janc suggested I should move the lower bound check into the caller and make it match the check for NFC_MAX_GT_LEN. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html