Message ID | 20141223152747.GA14667@vaishali-Ideapad-Z570 (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Headers | show |
On 12/23/14 16:27, Vaishali Thakkar wrote: > This patch introduces the use of function put_unaligned_le16. > > This is done using Coccinelle and semantic patch used is as follows: > > @a@ > typedef u16, __le16; > {u16,__le16} e16; > identifier tmp; > expression ptr; > expression y,e; > type T; > @@ > > - tmp = cpu_to_le16(y); > > <+... when != tmp > ( > - memcpy(ptr, (T)&tmp, \(2\|sizeof(u16)\|sizeof(__le16)\|sizeof(e16)\)); > + put_unaligned_le16(y,ptr); > | > - memcpy(ptr, (T)&tmp, ...); > + put_unaligned_le16(y,ptr); > ) > ...+> > ? tmp = e > > @@ type T; identifier a.tmp; @@ > > - T tmp; > ...when != tmp > > Signed-off-by: Vaishali Thakkar<vthakkar1994@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/nfc/port100.c | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/nfc/port100.c b/drivers/nfc/port100.c > index 4ac4d31..f7cbca8 100644 > --- a/drivers/nfc/port100.c > +++ b/drivers/nfc/port100.c > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ > #include<linux/module.h> > #include<linux/usb.h> > #include<net/nfc/digital.h> > +#include<linux/unaligned/access_ok.h> It is incorrect to use this header file as was pointed out by Johannes to me in a brcmfmac driver patch [1]. Unless this driver is architecture specific. Regards, Arend [1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=a1d69c60c44 > #define VERSION "0.1" > > @@ -1136,7 +1137,6 @@ static int port100_in_send_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, > { > struct port100 *dev = nfc_digital_get_drvdata(ddev); > struct port100_cb_arg *cb_arg; > - __le16 timeout; > > cb_arg = kzalloc(sizeof(struct port100_cb_arg), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!cb_arg) > @@ -1145,9 +1145,7 @@ static int port100_in_send_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, > cb_arg->complete_cb = cb; > cb_arg->complete_arg = arg; > > - timeout = cpu_to_le16(_timeout * 10); > - > - memcpy(skb_push(skb, sizeof(__le16)),&timeout, sizeof(__le16)); > + put_unaligned_le16(_timeout * 10, skb_push(skb, sizeof(__le16))); > > return port100_send_cmd_async(dev, PORT100_CMD_IN_COMM_RF, skb, > port100_in_comm_rf_complete, cb_arg); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com> wrote: > On 12/23/14 16:27, Vaishali Thakkar wrote: >> >> This patch introduces the use of function put_unaligned_le16. >> >> This is done using Coccinelle and semantic patch used is as follows: >> >> @a@ >> typedef u16, __le16; >> {u16,__le16} e16; >> identifier tmp; >> expression ptr; >> expression y,e; >> type T; >> @@ >> >> - tmp = cpu_to_le16(y); >> >> <+... when != tmp >> ( >> - memcpy(ptr, (T)&tmp, \(2\|sizeof(u16)\|sizeof(__le16)\|sizeof(e16)\)); >> + put_unaligned_le16(y,ptr); >> | >> - memcpy(ptr, (T)&tmp, ...); >> + put_unaligned_le16(y,ptr); >> ) >> ...+> >> ? tmp = e >> >> @@ type T; identifier a.tmp; @@ >> >> - T tmp; >> ...when != tmp >> >> Signed-off-by: Vaishali Thakkar<vthakkar1994@gmail.com> >> --- >> drivers/nfc/port100.c | 6 ++---- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/nfc/port100.c b/drivers/nfc/port100.c >> index 4ac4d31..f7cbca8 100644 >> --- a/drivers/nfc/port100.c >> +++ b/drivers/nfc/port100.c >> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ >> #include<linux/module.h> >> #include<linux/usb.h> >> #include<net/nfc/digital.h> >> +#include<linux/unaligned/access_ok.h> > > > It is incorrect to use this header file as was pointed out by Johannes to me > in a brcmfmac driver patch [1]. Unless this driver is architecture specific. > > Regards, > Arend > > [1] > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=a1d69c60c44 Ok. Thanks for pointing out. I didn't know this. So, I guess using <asm/unaligned.h> could make sense. Should I include this?? >> #define VERSION "0.1" >> >> @@ -1136,7 +1137,6 @@ static int port100_in_send_cmd(struct >> nfc_digital_dev *ddev, >> { >> struct port100 *dev = nfc_digital_get_drvdata(ddev); >> struct port100_cb_arg *cb_arg; >> - __le16 timeout; >> >> cb_arg = kzalloc(sizeof(struct port100_cb_arg), GFP_KERNEL); >> if (!cb_arg) >> @@ -1145,9 +1145,7 @@ static int port100_in_send_cmd(struct >> nfc_digital_dev *ddev, >> cb_arg->complete_cb = cb; >> cb_arg->complete_arg = arg; >> >> - timeout = cpu_to_le16(_timeout * 10); >> - >> - memcpy(skb_push(skb, sizeof(__le16)),&timeout, sizeof(__le16)); >> + put_unaligned_le16(_timeout * 10, skb_push(skb, sizeof(__le16))); >> >> return port100_send_cmd_async(dev, PORT100_CMD_IN_COMM_RF, skb, >> port100_in_comm_rf_complete, >> cb_arg); > >
On 12/24/14 03:35, Vaishali Thakkar wrote: > On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Arend van Spriel<arend@broadcom.com> wrote: >> On 12/23/14 16:27, Vaishali Thakkar wrote: >>> >>> This patch introduces the use of function put_unaligned_le16. >>> >>> This is done using Coccinelle and semantic patch used is as follows: >>> >>> @a@ >>> typedef u16, __le16; >>> {u16,__le16} e16; >>> identifier tmp; >>> expression ptr; >>> expression y,e; >>> type T; >>> @@ >>> >>> - tmp = cpu_to_le16(y); >>> >>> <+... when != tmp >>> ( >>> - memcpy(ptr, (T)&tmp, \(2\|sizeof(u16)\|sizeof(__le16)\|sizeof(e16)\)); >>> + put_unaligned_le16(y,ptr); >>> | >>> - memcpy(ptr, (T)&tmp, ...); >>> + put_unaligned_le16(y,ptr); >>> ) >>> ...+> >>> ? tmp = e >>> >>> @@ type T; identifier a.tmp; @@ >>> >>> - T tmp; >>> ...when != tmp >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Vaishali Thakkar<vthakkar1994@gmail.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/nfc/port100.c | 6 ++---- >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/nfc/port100.c b/drivers/nfc/port100.c >>> index 4ac4d31..f7cbca8 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/nfc/port100.c >>> +++ b/drivers/nfc/port100.c >>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ >>> #include<linux/module.h> >>> #include<linux/usb.h> >>> #include<net/nfc/digital.h> >>> +#include<linux/unaligned/access_ok.h> >> >> >> It is incorrect to use this header file as was pointed out by Johannes to me >> in a brcmfmac driver patch [1]. Unless this driver is architecture specific. >> >> Regards, >> Arend >> >> [1] >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=a1d69c60c44 > > Ok. Thanks for pointing out. I didn't know this. So, I guess using > <asm/unaligned.h> could make sense. Should I include this?? That's the one. Regards, Arend >>> #define VERSION "0.1" >>> >>> @@ -1136,7 +1137,6 @@ static int port100_in_send_cmd(struct >>> nfc_digital_dev *ddev, >>> { >>> struct port100 *dev = nfc_digital_get_drvdata(ddev); >>> struct port100_cb_arg *cb_arg; >>> - __le16 timeout; >>> >>> cb_arg = kzalloc(sizeof(struct port100_cb_arg), GFP_KERNEL); >>> if (!cb_arg) >>> @@ -1145,9 +1145,7 @@ static int port100_in_send_cmd(struct >>> nfc_digital_dev *ddev, >>> cb_arg->complete_cb = cb; >>> cb_arg->complete_arg = arg; >>> >>> - timeout = cpu_to_le16(_timeout * 10); >>> - >>> - memcpy(skb_push(skb, sizeof(__le16)),&timeout, sizeof(__le16)); >>> + put_unaligned_le16(_timeout * 10, skb_push(skb, sizeof(__le16))); >>> >>> return port100_send_cmd_async(dev, PORT100_CMD_IN_COMM_RF, skb, >>> port100_in_comm_rf_complete, >>> cb_arg); >> >> > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/nfc/port100.c b/drivers/nfc/port100.c index 4ac4d31..f7cbca8 100644 --- a/drivers/nfc/port100.c +++ b/drivers/nfc/port100.c @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/usb.h> #include <net/nfc/digital.h> +#include <linux/unaligned/access_ok.h> #define VERSION "0.1" @@ -1136,7 +1137,6 @@ static int port100_in_send_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, { struct port100 *dev = nfc_digital_get_drvdata(ddev); struct port100_cb_arg *cb_arg; - __le16 timeout; cb_arg = kzalloc(sizeof(struct port100_cb_arg), GFP_KERNEL); if (!cb_arg) @@ -1145,9 +1145,7 @@ static int port100_in_send_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, cb_arg->complete_cb = cb; cb_arg->complete_arg = arg; - timeout = cpu_to_le16(_timeout * 10); - - memcpy(skb_push(skb, sizeof(__le16)), &timeout, sizeof(__le16)); + put_unaligned_le16(_timeout * 10, skb_push(skb, sizeof(__le16))); return port100_send_cmd_async(dev, PORT100_CMD_IN_COMM_RF, skb, port100_in_comm_rf_complete, cb_arg);
This patch introduces the use of function put_unaligned_le16. This is done using Coccinelle and semantic patch used is as follows: @a@ typedef u16, __le16; {u16,__le16} e16; identifier tmp; expression ptr; expression y,e; type T; @@ - tmp = cpu_to_le16(y); <+... when != tmp ( - memcpy(ptr, (T)&tmp, \(2\|sizeof(u16)\|sizeof(__le16)\|sizeof(e16)\)); + put_unaligned_le16(y,ptr); | - memcpy(ptr, (T)&tmp, ...); + put_unaligned_le16(y,ptr); ) ...+> ? tmp = e @@ type T; identifier a.tmp; @@ - T tmp; ...when != tmp Signed-off-by: Vaishali Thakkar <vthakkar1994@gmail.com> --- drivers/nfc/port100.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)