Message ID | 20210904114937.6644-1-len.baker@gmx.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Kalle Valo |
Headers | show |
Series | ath11k: Replace one-element array with flexible-array member | expand |
There is already a patch for this: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210823172159.GA25800@embeddedor/ which I will now add to my -next tree. Thanks -- Gustavo On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 01:49:37PM +0200, Len Baker wrote: > There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having > a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code > should always use "flexible array members"[1] for these cases. The older > style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. > > Also, refactor the code a bit to make use of the struct_size() helper in > kzalloc(). > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member > [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.14/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays > > Signed-off-by: Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com> > --- > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/reg.c | 7 ++----- > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.h | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/reg.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/reg.c > index e1a1df169034..c83d265185f1 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/reg.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/reg.c > @@ -97,7 +97,6 @@ int ath11k_reg_update_chan_list(struct ath11k *ar) > struct channel_param *ch; > enum nl80211_band band; > int num_channels = 0; > - int params_len; > int i, ret; > > bands = hw->wiphy->bands; > @@ -117,10 +116,8 @@ int ath11k_reg_update_chan_list(struct ath11k *ar) > if (WARN_ON(!num_channels)) > return -EINVAL; > > - params_len = sizeof(struct scan_chan_list_params) + > - num_channels * sizeof(struct channel_param); > - params = kzalloc(params_len, GFP_KERNEL); > - > + params = kzalloc(struct_size(params, ch_param, num_channels), > + GFP_KERNEL); > if (!params) > return -ENOMEM; > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.h > index d35c47e0b19d..d9c83726f65d 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.h > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.h > @@ -3608,7 +3608,7 @@ struct wmi_stop_scan_cmd { > struct scan_chan_list_params { > u32 pdev_id; > u16 nallchans; > - struct channel_param ch_param[1]; > + struct channel_param ch_param[]; > }; > > struct wmi_scan_chan_list_cmd { > -- > 2.25.1 >
On 9/12/21 14:31, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > There is already a patch for this: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210823172159.GA25800@embeddedor/ > > which I will now add to my -next tree. Well, in this case I think it's much better if Kalle can take it. :) -- Gustavo > On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 01:49:37PM +0200, Len Baker wrote: >> There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having >> a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code >> should always use "flexible array members"[1] for these cases. The older >> style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. >> >> Also, refactor the code a bit to make use of the struct_size() helper in >> kzalloc(). >> >> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member >> [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.14/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays >> >> Signed-off-by: Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com> >> --- >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/reg.c | 7 ++----- >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.h | 2 +- >> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/reg.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/reg.c >> index e1a1df169034..c83d265185f1 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/reg.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/reg.c >> @@ -97,7 +97,6 @@ int ath11k_reg_update_chan_list(struct ath11k *ar) >> struct channel_param *ch; >> enum nl80211_band band; >> int num_channels = 0; >> - int params_len; >> int i, ret; >> >> bands = hw->wiphy->bands; >> @@ -117,10 +116,8 @@ int ath11k_reg_update_chan_list(struct ath11k *ar) >> if (WARN_ON(!num_channels)) >> return -EINVAL; >> >> - params_len = sizeof(struct scan_chan_list_params) + >> - num_channels * sizeof(struct channel_param); >> - params = kzalloc(params_len, GFP_KERNEL); >> - >> + params = kzalloc(struct_size(params, ch_param, num_channels), >> + GFP_KERNEL); >> if (!params) >> return -ENOMEM; >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.h >> index d35c47e0b19d..d9c83726f65d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.h >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.h >> @@ -3608,7 +3608,7 @@ struct wmi_stop_scan_cmd { >> struct scan_chan_list_params { >> u32 pdev_id; >> u16 nallchans; >> - struct channel_param ch_param[1]; >> + struct channel_param ch_param[]; >> }; >> >> struct wmi_scan_chan_list_cmd { >> -- >> 2.25.1 >>
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com> writes: > On 9/12/21 14:31, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: >> >> There is already a patch for this: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210823172159.GA25800@embeddedor/ >> >> which I will now add to my -next tree. > > Well, in this case I think it's much better if Kalle can take it. :) Please don't take any ath11k patches. I have a ton of ath11k patches in my queue and if you start taking some of them, it will cause conflicts between trees. Only take wireless-driver patches which I have acked, please.
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/reg.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/reg.c index e1a1df169034..c83d265185f1 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/reg.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/reg.c @@ -97,7 +97,6 @@ int ath11k_reg_update_chan_list(struct ath11k *ar) struct channel_param *ch; enum nl80211_band band; int num_channels = 0; - int params_len; int i, ret; bands = hw->wiphy->bands; @@ -117,10 +116,8 @@ int ath11k_reg_update_chan_list(struct ath11k *ar) if (WARN_ON(!num_channels)) return -EINVAL; - params_len = sizeof(struct scan_chan_list_params) + - num_channels * sizeof(struct channel_param); - params = kzalloc(params_len, GFP_KERNEL); - + params = kzalloc(struct_size(params, ch_param, num_channels), + GFP_KERNEL); if (!params) return -ENOMEM; diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.h index d35c47e0b19d..d9c83726f65d 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.h +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.h @@ -3608,7 +3608,7 @@ struct wmi_stop_scan_cmd { struct scan_chan_list_params { u32 pdev_id; u16 nallchans; - struct channel_param ch_param[1]; + struct channel_param ch_param[]; }; struct wmi_scan_chan_list_cmd {
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use "flexible array members"[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Also, refactor the code a bit to make use of the struct_size() helper in kzalloc(). [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.14/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays Signed-off-by: Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com> --- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/reg.c | 7 ++----- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) -- 2.25.1