diff mbox series

rtw88: check the return value of alloc_workqueue()

Message ID 20220723063756.2956189-1-williamsukatube@163.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 42bbf810e155efc6129a3a648ae5300f00b79d7b
Delegated to: Kalle Valo
Headers show
Series rtw88: check the return value of alloc_workqueue() | expand

Commit Message

williamsukatube@163.com July 23, 2022, 6:37 a.m. UTC
From: William Dean <williamsukatube@gmail.com>

The function alloc_workqueue() in rtw_core_init() can fail, but
there is no check of its return value. To fix this bug, its return value
should be checked with new error handling code.

Fixes: fe101716c7c9d ("rtw88: replace tx tasklet with work queue")
Reported-by: Hacash Robot <hacashRobot@santino.com>
Signed-off-by: William Dean <williamsukatube@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

Comments

Ping-Ke Shih July 26, 2022, 2:38 a.m. UTC | #1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: williamsukatube@163.com <williamsukatube@163.com>
> Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2022 2:38 PM
> To: tony0620emma@gmail.com; kvalo@kernel.org; davem@davemloft.net; edumazet@google.com; kuba@kernel.org;
> pabeni@redhat.com; linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: William Dean <williamsukatube@gmail.com>; Hacash Robot <hacashRobot@santino.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] rtw88: check the return value of alloc_workqueue()
> 
> From: William Dean <williamsukatube@gmail.com>
> 
> The function alloc_workqueue() in rtw_core_init() can fail, but
> there is no check of its return value. To fix this bug, its return value
> should be checked with new error handling code.
> 
> Fixes: fe101716c7c9d ("rtw88: replace tx tasklet with work queue")
> Reported-by: Hacash Robot <hacashRobot@santino.com>
> Signed-off-by: William Dean <williamsukatube@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>

Thank you

> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c
> index efabd5b1bf5b..645ef1d01895 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c
> @@ -1984,6 +1984,10 @@ int rtw_core_init(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev)
>  	timer_setup(&rtwdev->tx_report.purge_timer,
>  		    rtw_tx_report_purge_timer, 0);
>  	rtwdev->tx_wq = alloc_workqueue("rtw_tx_wq", WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_HIGHPRI, 0);
> +	if (!rtwdev->tx_wq) {
> +		rtw_warn(rtwdev, "alloc_workqueue rtw_tx_wq failed\n");
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> 
>  	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&rtwdev->watch_dog_work, rtw_watch_dog_work);
>  	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&coex->bt_relink_work, rtw_coex_bt_relink_work);
> --
> 2.25.1
Kalle Valo July 29, 2022, 1:35 p.m. UTC | #2
williamsukatube@163.com wrote:

> From: William Dean <williamsukatube@gmail.com>
> 
> The function alloc_workqueue() in rtw_core_init() can fail, but
> there is no check of its return value. To fix this bug, its return value
> should be checked with new error handling code.
> 
> Fixes: fe101716c7c9d ("rtw88: replace tx tasklet with work queue")
> Reported-by: Hacash Robot <hacashRobot@santino.com>
> Signed-off-by: William Dean <williamsukatube@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>

Patch applied to wireless-next.git, thanks.

42bbf810e155 wifi: rtw88: check the return value of alloc_workqueue()
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c
index efabd5b1bf5b..645ef1d01895 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c
@@ -1984,6 +1984,10 @@  int rtw_core_init(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev)
 	timer_setup(&rtwdev->tx_report.purge_timer,
 		    rtw_tx_report_purge_timer, 0);
 	rtwdev->tx_wq = alloc_workqueue("rtw_tx_wq", WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_HIGHPRI, 0);
+	if (!rtwdev->tx_wq) {
+		rtw_warn(rtwdev, "alloc_workqueue rtw_tx_wq failed\n");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
 
 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&rtwdev->watch_dog_work, rtw_watch_dog_work);
 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&coex->bt_relink_work, rtw_coex_bt_relink_work);