Message ID | 20230612232301.2572316-1-azeemshaikh38@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Delegated to: | Johannes Berg |
Headers | show |
Series | cfg80211: cfg80211: strlcpy withreturn | expand |
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:23:01PM +0000, Azeem Shaikh wrote: > strlcpy() reads the entire source buffer first. > This read may exceed the destination size limit. > This is both inefficient and can lead to linear read > overflows if a source string is not NUL-terminated [1]. > In an effort to remove strlcpy() completely [2], replace > strlcpy() here with strscpy(). > > Direct replacement is safe here since WIPHY_ASSIGN is only used by > TRACE macros and the return values are ignored. > > [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strlcpy > [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/89 > > Signed-off-by: Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@gmail.com> writes: > strlcpy() reads the entire source buffer first. > This read may exceed the destination size limit. > This is both inefficient and can lead to linear read > overflows if a source string is not NUL-terminated [1]. > In an effort to remove strlcpy() completely [2], replace > strlcpy() here with strscpy(). > > Direct replacement is safe here since WIPHY_ASSIGN is only used by > TRACE macros and the return values are ignored. > > [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strlcpy > [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/89 > > Signed-off-by: Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@gmail.com> The title should be: wifi: cfg80211: replace strlcpy() with strlscpy()
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 3:40 AM Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> wrote: > > Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@gmail.com> writes: > > > strlcpy() reads the entire source buffer first. > > This read may exceed the destination size limit. > > This is both inefficient and can lead to linear read > > overflows if a source string is not NUL-terminated [1]. > > In an effort to remove strlcpy() completely [2], replace > > strlcpy() here with strscpy(). > > > > Direct replacement is safe here since WIPHY_ASSIGN is only used by > > TRACE macros and the return values are ignored. > > > > [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strlcpy > > [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/89 > > > > Signed-off-by: Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@gmail.com> > > The title should be: > > wifi: cfg80211: replace strlcpy() with strlscpy() > Ack. Sent out a v2. > -- > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ > > https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
diff --git a/net/wireless/trace.h b/net/wireless/trace.h index 716a1fa70069..a00da3ebfed5 100644 --- a/net/wireless/trace.h +++ b/net/wireless/trace.h @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ #define MAXNAME 32 #define WIPHY_ENTRY __array(char, wiphy_name, 32) -#define WIPHY_ASSIGN strlcpy(__entry->wiphy_name, wiphy_name(wiphy), MAXNAME) +#define WIPHY_ASSIGN strscpy(__entry->wiphy_name, wiphy_name(wiphy), MAXNAME) #define WIPHY_PR_FMT "%s" #define WIPHY_PR_ARG __entry->wiphy_name
strlcpy() reads the entire source buffer first. This read may exceed the destination size limit. This is both inefficient and can lead to linear read overflows if a source string is not NUL-terminated [1]. In an effort to remove strlcpy() completely [2], replace strlcpy() here with strscpy(). Direct replacement is safe here since WIPHY_ASSIGN is only used by TRACE macros and the return values are ignored. [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strlcpy [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/89 Signed-off-by: Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@gmail.com> --- net/wireless/trace.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)