Message ID | 20231009101800.bb75408bf635.I6528d97e24b3da36cdf633b4738327d77c7276f2@changeid (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Delegated to: | Johannes Berg |
Headers | show |
Series | wifi: cfg80211: use system_unbound_wq for wiphy work | expand |
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> writes: > From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> > > Since wiphy work items can run pretty much arbitrary > code in the stack/driver, it can take longer to run > all of this, so we shouldn't be using system_wq via > schedule_work(). Also, we lock the wiphy (which is > the reason this exists), so use system_unbound_wq. > > Reported-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> > Fixes: a3ee4dc84c4e ("wifi: cfg80211: add a work abstraction with special semantics") > Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Thanks! So the background of this is that I enabled CONFIG_WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE_REPORT on my ath11k test box and saw: [ 290.475631] workqueue: cfg80211_wiphy_work [cfg80211] hogged CPU for >10000us 4 times, consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND With Johannes' patch I don't see it anymore so: Tested-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> I do see one other warning about gc_worker but that's from netfilter and nothing to do with wireless: [ 440.486683] workqueue: gc_worker hogged CPU for >10000us 128 times, consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND
diff --git a/net/wireless/core.c b/net/wireless/core.c index 7df8ffcfa0c4..758c9a2a12c0 100644 --- a/net/wireless/core.c +++ b/net/wireless/core.c @@ -1613,7 +1613,7 @@ void wiphy_work_queue(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct wiphy_work *work) list_add_tail(&work->entry, &rdev->wiphy_work_list); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rdev->wiphy_work_lock, flags); - schedule_work(&rdev->wiphy_work); + queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &rdev->wiphy_work); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wiphy_work_queue);