Message ID | 20231113112844.15d7a0ee3fda.I1879d259d8d756159c8060f61f4bce172e6d323e@changeid (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | Johannes Berg |
Headers | show |
Series | cfg80211/mac80211 patches from our internal tree 2023-11-13 | expand |
On Mon, 2023-11-13 at 11:35 +0200, gregory.greenman@intel.com wrote: > > @@ -9302,6 +9302,17 @@ bool cfg80211_valid_disable_subchannel_bitmap(u16 *bitmap, > * case disconnect instead. > * Also note that the wdev mutex must be held. > */ > + > void cfg80211_links_removed(struct net_device *dev, u16 link_mask); What happened there? > +/** > + * cfg80211_schedule_channels_check - schedule regulatory check if needed > + * @netdev: the device to check > + * > + * In case the device supports NO_IR or DFS relaxations, schedule regulatory > + * channels check, as previous concurrent operation conditions may not > + * hold anymore. > + */ ... > +void cfg80211_schedule_channels_check(struct net_device *netdev) > +{ > + struct wireless_dev *wdev = netdev->ieee80211_ptr; > + struct wiphy *wiphy = wdev->wiphy; > + > + /* Schedule channels check if NO_IR or DFS relaxations are supported */ > + if (wdev->iftype == NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION && > + (wiphy_ext_feature_isset(wiphy, > + NL80211_EXT_FEATURE_DFS_CONCURRENT) || > + (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CFG80211_REG_RELAX_NO_IR) && > + wiphy->regulatory_flags & REGULATORY_ENABLE_RELAX_NO_IR))) > + reg_check_channels(); > +} That ... doesn't even use the netdev pointer, apart from going to the wiphy? Why not have a wiphy argument instead? johannes
> cfg80211_valid_disable_subchannel_bitmap(u16 *bitmap, > > * case disconnect instead. > > * Also note that the wdev mutex must be held. > > */ > > + > > void cfg80211_links_removed(struct net_device *dev, u16 link_mask); > > What happened there? No idea, it wasn't in the original patch.. Will recheck with Gregory and fix it. > > > +void cfg80211_schedule_channels_check(struct net_device *netdev) { > > + struct wireless_dev *wdev = netdev->ieee80211_ptr; > > + struct wiphy *wiphy = wdev->wiphy; > > + > > + /* Schedule channels check if NO_IR or DFS relaxations are > supported */ > > + if (wdev->iftype == NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION && > > + (wiphy_ext_feature_isset(wiphy, > > + > NL80211_EXT_FEATURE_DFS_CONCURRENT) || > > + (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CFG80211_REG_RELAX_NO_IR) && > > + wiphy->regulatory_flags & > REGULATORY_ENABLE_RELAX_NO_IR))) > > + reg_check_channels(); > > +} > > That ... doesn't even use the netdev pointer, apart from going to the wiphy? > Why not have a wiphy argument instead? We do need wdev here, I will change it to be wireless device instead > > johannes
> > > > > > +void cfg80211_schedule_channels_check(struct net_device *netdev) { > > > + struct wireless_dev *wdev = netdev->ieee80211_ptr; > > > + struct wiphy *wiphy = wdev->wiphy; > > > + > > > + /* Schedule channels check if NO_IR or DFS relaxations are > > supported */ > > > + if (wdev->iftype == NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION && > > > + (wiphy_ext_feature_isset(wiphy, > > We do need wdev here, > Oh right, I missed that, sorry. > I will change it to be wireless device instead > No need I guess, if we're only going to check for it being a station? Would we ever have a reason to call this for a p2p/nan device? I guess not, since that doesn't affect regulatory in the same way? johannes
> > > > +void cfg80211_schedule_channels_check(struct net_device *netdev) > { > > > > + struct wireless_dev *wdev = netdev->ieee80211_ptr; > > > > + struct wiphy *wiphy = wdev->wiphy; > > > > + > > > > + /* Schedule channels check if NO_IR or DFS relaxations are > > > supported */ > > > > + if (wdev->iftype == NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION && > > > > + (wiphy_ext_feature_isset(wiphy, > > > > We do need wdev here, > > > > Oh right, I missed that, sorry. > > > I will change it to be wireless device instead > > > > No need I guess, if we're only going to check for it being a station? > Would we ever have a reason to call this for a p2p/nan device? I guess > not, since that doesn't affect regulatory in the same way? No, I don't think P2P/NAN devices can anyhow affect regulatory, for sure not for concurrent DFS case. > > johannes
diff --git a/include/net/cfg80211.h b/include/net/cfg80211.h index c467d11283f7..8477f65f54ce 100644 --- a/include/net/cfg80211.h +++ b/include/net/cfg80211.h @@ -9302,6 +9302,17 @@ bool cfg80211_valid_disable_subchannel_bitmap(u16 *bitmap, * case disconnect instead. * Also note that the wdev mutex must be held. */ + void cfg80211_links_removed(struct net_device *dev, u16 link_mask); +/** + * cfg80211_schedule_channels_check - schedule regulatory check if needed + * @netdev: the device to check + * + * In case the device supports NO_IR or DFS relaxations, schedule regulatory + * channels check, as previous concurrent operation conditions may not + * hold anymore. + */ +void cfg80211_schedule_channels_check(struct net_device *netdev); + #endif /* __NET_CFG80211_H */ diff --git a/net/wireless/nl80211.c b/net/wireless/nl80211.c index c693ebddd053..413dc2a652a7 100644 --- a/net/wireless/nl80211.c +++ b/net/wireless/nl80211.c @@ -19310,6 +19310,7 @@ void cfg80211_ch_switch_notify(struct net_device *dev, break; } + cfg80211_schedule_channels_check(dev); cfg80211_sched_dfs_chan_update(rdev); nl80211_ch_switch_notify(rdev, dev, link_id, chandef, GFP_KERNEL, @@ -20067,6 +20068,21 @@ void cfg80211_update_owe_info_event(struct net_device *netdev, } EXPORT_SYMBOL(cfg80211_update_owe_info_event); +void cfg80211_schedule_channels_check(struct net_device *netdev) +{ + struct wireless_dev *wdev = netdev->ieee80211_ptr; + struct wiphy *wiphy = wdev->wiphy; + + /* Schedule channels check if NO_IR or DFS relaxations are supported */ + if (wdev->iftype == NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION && + (wiphy_ext_feature_isset(wiphy, + NL80211_EXT_FEATURE_DFS_CONCURRENT) || + (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CFG80211_REG_RELAX_NO_IR) && + wiphy->regulatory_flags & REGULATORY_ENABLE_RELAX_NO_IR))) + reg_check_channels(); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cfg80211_schedule_channels_check); + /* initialisation/exit functions */ int __init nl80211_init(void) diff --git a/net/wireless/reg.c b/net/wireless/reg.c index 552c05bbad47..a3210d151653 100644 --- a/net/wireless/reg.c +++ b/net/wireless/reg.c @@ -2481,7 +2481,7 @@ static void reg_check_chans_work(struct work_struct *work) rtnl_unlock(); } -static void reg_check_channels(void) +void reg_check_channels(void) { /* * Give usermode a chance to do something nicer (move to another diff --git a/net/wireless/reg.h b/net/wireless/reg.h index a703e53c23ee..a02ef5609f52 100644 --- a/net/wireless/reg.h +++ b/net/wireless/reg.h @@ -181,6 +181,11 @@ bool reg_dfs_domain_same(struct wiphy *wiphy1, struct wiphy *wiphy2); */ int reg_reload_regdb(void); +/** + * reg_check_channels - schedule regulatory enforcement + */ +void reg_check_channels(void); + extern const u8 shipped_regdb_certs[]; extern unsigned int shipped_regdb_certs_len; extern const u8 extra_regdb_certs[]; diff --git a/net/wireless/sme.c b/net/wireless/sme.c index acfe66da7109..c1a880c4af1c 100644 --- a/net/wireless/sme.c +++ b/net/wireless/sme.c @@ -1394,6 +1394,8 @@ void __cfg80211_disconnected(struct net_device *dev, const u8 *ie, #endif schedule_work(&cfg80211_disconnect_work); + + cfg80211_schedule_channels_check(dev); } void cfg80211_disconnected(struct net_device *dev, u16 reason,