Message ID | 20240505091420.4614e6891dbd.Ie40eae0dd99d82ba60dea5b6dbcd42dcdf16b90d@changeid (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Delegated to: | Johannes Berg |
Headers | show |
Series | wifi: iwlwifi: updates - 2024-05-05 | expand |
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/link.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/link.c index 79f048f54a21..9d7f9e5be253 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/link.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/link.c @@ -727,8 +727,8 @@ void iwl_mvm_select_links(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, struct ieee80211_vif *vif) if (hweight16(new_active_links) <= 1) goto set_active; - /* prefer single link over marginal eSR improvement */ - if (best_link->grade * 110 / 100 >= max_esr_grade) { + /* For equal grade - prefer EMLSR */ + if (best_link->grade > max_esr_grade) { primary_link = best_link->link_id; new_active_links = BIT(best_link->link_id); }
The new link selection algorithm uses defaults values for BSS load if the BSS Load element was not published by the AP. For 6 GHz, that value is 0. So if the best link is 6 GHz, the EMLSR grade to always be equal to the grade of the best link, and then the best link grade is getting a bonus of 10 percent, meaning that we will never activate EMLSR. Change the logic to not give a bonus for the best link. Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com> --- drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/link.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)