@@ -356,8 +356,8 @@ static void rtw89_phy_ra_sta_update(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
csi_mode = RTW89_RA_RPT_MODE_HT;
ra_mask |= ((u64)sta->deflink.ht_cap.mcs.rx_mask[3] << 48) |
((u64)sta->deflink.ht_cap.mcs.rx_mask[2] << 36) |
- (sta->deflink.ht_cap.mcs.rx_mask[1] << 24) |
- (sta->deflink.ht_cap.mcs.rx_mask[0] << 12);
+ ((u64)sta->deflink.ht_cap.mcs.rx_mask[1] << 24) |
+ ((u64)sta->deflink.ht_cap.mcs.rx_mask[0] << 12);
high_rate_masks = rtw89_ra_mask_ht_rates;
if (sta->deflink.ht_cap.cap & IEEE80211_HT_CAP_RX_STBC)
stbc_en = 1;
Coverity reported that u8 rx_mask << 24 will become signed 32 bits, which casting to unsigned 64 bits will do sign extension. For example, putting 0x80000000 (signed 32 bits) to a u64 variable will become 0xFFFFFFFF_80000000. The real case we meet is: rx_mask[0...3] = ff ff 00 00 ra_mask = 0xffffffff_ff0ff000 After this fix: rx_mask[0...3] = ff ff 00 00 ra_mask = 0x00000000_ff0ff000 Fortunately driver does bitwise-AND with incorrect ra_mask and supported rates (1ss and 2ss rate only) afterward, so the final rate mask of original code is still correct. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1504762 ("Unintended sign extension") Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> --- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)