diff mbox series

wifi: nl80211: override all other flags if MONITOR_FLAG_COOK_FRAMES is set

Message ID 20250130123432.4534-1-v.shevtsov@mt-integration.ru (mailing list archive)
State New
Delegated to: Johannes Berg
Headers show
Series wifi: nl80211: override all other flags if MONITOR_FLAG_COOK_FRAMES is set | expand

Commit Message

Vitaliy Shevtsov Jan. 30, 2025, 12:34 p.m. UTC
It is possible to set both MONITOR_FLAG_COOK_FRAMES and MONITOR_FLAG_ACTIVE
flags simultaneously on the same monitor interface from the userspace. This
causes a sub-interface to be created with no IEEE80211_SDATA_IN_DRIVER bit
set because the monitor interface is in the cooked state and it takes
precedence over all other states. When the interface is then being deleted
the kernel calls WARN_ONCE() from check_sdata_in_driver() because of missing
that bit.

Fix this by overriding all flags if MONITOR_FLAG_COOK_FRAMES is set because
this flag is incompatible with other monitor flags being set.

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.

Fixes: 66f7ac50ed7c (nl80211: Add monitor interface configuration flags)
Reported-by: syzbot+2e5c1e55b9e5c28a3da7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2e5c1e55b9e5c28a3da7
Signed-off-by: Vitaliy Shevtsov <v.shevtsov@mt-integration.ru>
---
 net/wireless/nl80211.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

Comments

Fedor Pchelkin Jan. 30, 2025, 7:23 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, 30. Jan 13:36, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-01-30 at 17:34 +0500, Vitaliy Shevtsov wrote:
> > It is possible to set both MONITOR_FLAG_COOK_FRAMES and MONITOR_FLAG_ACTIVE
> > flags simultaneously on the same monitor interface from the userspace. This
> > causes a sub-interface to be created with no IEEE80211_SDATA_IN_DRIVER bit
> > set because the monitor interface is in the cooked state and it takes
> > precedence over all other states. When the interface is then being deleted
> > the kernel calls WARN_ONCE() from check_sdata_in_driver() because of missing
> > that bit.
> > 
> > Fix this by overriding all flags if MONITOR_FLAG_COOK_FRAMES is set because
> > this flag is incompatible with other monitor flags being set.
> > 
> 
> That seems wrong, reject it instead. Anyway we should probably remove
> cooked mode.

Do you suggest rejecting to set MONITOR_FLAG_COOK_FRAMES overall?
Wouldn't it break existing userspace, especially in context of systems
running old stable kernels where the patch is also needed?

There is still some usage of this flag in hostap [1].

Or your suggestion is to explicitly reject setting MONITOR_FLAG_COOK_FRAMES
only when it is passed combined with some other flags which it is
incompatible with?

Btw, the fragment [2] says the cooked flag overrides the other ones.
But it was written a long time ago so many things have changed I guess.

  /**
   * enum nl80211_mntr_flags - monitor configuration flags
   *
   * Monitor configuration flags.
  
  ...
  
   * @NL80211_MNTR_FLAG_COOK_FRAMES: report frames after processing.
   *	overrides all other flags.

[1]: https://w1.fi/cgit/hostap/tree/src/drivers/driver_nl80211.c#n6209
[2]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/uapi/linux/nl80211.h#n4731

--
Thanks,
Fedor
Johannes Berg Jan. 30, 2025, 9:13 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 2025-01-30 at 22:23 +0300, Fedor Pchelkin wrote:
> 
> Do you suggest rejecting to set MONITOR_FLAG_COOK_FRAMES overall?

No and yes :)

No for the context of this patch. Yes in general.

> Wouldn't it break existing userspace, especially in context of systems
> running old stable kernels where the patch is also needed?
> 
> There is still some usage of this flag in hostap [1].

Theoretically, but I just commented on that here:

https://lore.kernel.org/r/a49e58998553c45953a30243ad1957c06ce6db8c.camel@sipsolutions.net

tl;dr: only ancient hostapd versions will actually _use_ it, and they
have to fall into a relatively narrow range (April 2009 - Dec 2011.)

> Or your suggestion is to explicitly reject setting MONITOR_FLAG_COOK_FRAMES
> only when it is passed combined with some other flags which it is
> incompatible with?

Yes.

> Btw, the fragment [2] says the cooked flag overrides the other ones.
> But it was written a long time ago so many things have changed I guess.

Indeed, that doesn't really make sense (certainly not any longer.)

> [1]: https://w1.fi/cgit/hostap/tree/src/drivers/driver_nl80211.c#n6209

And that was almost certainly the only user that ever existed, and can
only set the flag by itself.

johannes
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/wireless/nl80211.c b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
index d7d3da0f6833..1338b0a06f8d 100644
--- a/net/wireless/nl80211.c
+++ b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
@@ -4220,6 +4220,10 @@  static int parse_monitor_flags(struct nlattr *nla, u32 *mntrflags)
 		if (flags[flag])
 			*mntrflags |= (1<<flag);
 
+	/* MONITOR_FLAG_COOK_FRAMES must override all other flags */
+	if (*mntrflags & MONITOR_FLAG_COOK_FRAMES)
+		*mntrflags = MONITOR_FLAG_COOK_FRAMES;
+
 	*mntrflags |= MONITOR_FLAG_CHANGED;
 
 	return 0;