| Message ID | 20250303-topic-ath12k-fix-crash-v1-1-f871d4e4d968@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Delegated to: | Jeff Johnson |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [net] wifi: ath12k: properly set single_chip_mlo_supp to true in ath12k_core_alloc() | expand |
On 3/3/2025 7:00 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote: > In commit 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to single_chip_mlo_supp") > the line: > ab->mlo_capable_flags = ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; > was incorrectly updated to: > ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; > leading to always disabling INTRA_DEVICE_MLO even if the device supports it. > > The firmware "WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1" > crashes on driver initialization with: > ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: chip_id 0x2 chip_family 0x4 board_id 0x3d soc_id 0x40170200 > ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x110f009c fw_build_timestamp 2024-05-30 11:35 fw_build_id QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1 > ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: ignore reset dev flags 0x200 > ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to receive wmi unified ready event: -110 > ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to start core: -110 > failed to send QMI message > ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: qmi failed to send mode request, mode: 4, err = -5 > ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: qmi failed to send wlan mode off > > With ab->single_chip_mlo_supp set to True, firmware loads nominally. > > Fixes: 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to single_chip_mlo_supp") > Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> > --- > Bisect log for reference: > The bisect leaded to: > git bisect start 'v6.14-rc4' 'v6.12' > git bisect good 5757b31666277e2b177b406e48878dc48d587a46 > git bisect bad d78794d4f4dbeac0a39e15d2fbc8e917741b5b7c > git bisect bad cf33d96f50903214226b379b3f10d1f262dae018 > git bisect good 12e070eb6964b341b41677fd260af5a305316a1f > git bisect bad 6917d207b469ee81e6dc7f8ccca29c234a16916d > git bisect good 4fefbc66dfb356145633e571475be2459d73ce16 > git bisect bad a6ac667467b642c94928c24ac2eb40d20110983c > git bisect bad b05d30c2b6df7e2172b18bf1baee9b202f9c6b53 > git bisect good 56dcbf0b520796e26b2bbe5686bdd305ad924954 > git bisect bad d302ac65ac938516487f57ae20f11e9cf6327606 > git bisect good 8c2143702d0719a0357600bca0236900781ffc78 > git bisect good a5686ae820fa7ab03226a3b0ff529720b7bac599 > git bisect bad 6f245ea0ec6c29b90c8fa4fdf6e178c646125d7e > git bisect bad 46d16f7e1d1413ad7ff99c1334d8874623717745 > --- > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c > index 0606116d6b9c491b6ede401b2e1aedfb619339a8..33aba5fceec946fad5a47a11a4d86b7be96e682e 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c > @@ -1927,7 +1927,7 @@ struct ath12k_base *ath12k_core_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t priv_size, > ab->dev = dev; > ab->hif.bus = bus; > ab->qmi.num_radios = U8_MAX; > - ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; > + ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = true; > > /* Device index used to identify the devices in a group. > * > > --- > base-commit: 7eb172143d5508b4da468ed59ee857c6e5e01da6 > change-id: 20250303-topic-ath12k-fix-crash-49e9055c61a1 > > Best regards, NAK since this will break QCN There is a series under internal review to address MLO issues for WCN chipsets
On 18/03/2025 17:35, Jeff Johnson wrote: > On 3/3/2025 7:00 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote: >> In commit 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to single_chip_mlo_supp") >> the line: >> ab->mlo_capable_flags = ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; >> was incorrectly updated to: >> ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; >> leading to always disabling INTRA_DEVICE_MLO even if the device supports it. >> >> The firmware "WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1" >> crashes on driver initialization with: >> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: chip_id 0x2 chip_family 0x4 board_id 0x3d soc_id 0x40170200 >> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x110f009c fw_build_timestamp 2024-05-30 11:35 fw_build_id QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1 >> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: ignore reset dev flags 0x200 >> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to receive wmi unified ready event: -110 >> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to start core: -110 >> failed to send QMI message >> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: qmi failed to send mode request, mode: 4, err = -5 >> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: qmi failed to send wlan mode off >> >> With ab->single_chip_mlo_supp set to True, firmware loads nominally. >> >> Fixes: 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to single_chip_mlo_supp") >> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> >> --- >> Bisect log for reference: >> The bisect leaded to: >> git bisect start 'v6.14-rc4' 'v6.12' >> git bisect good 5757b31666277e2b177b406e48878dc48d587a46 >> git bisect bad d78794d4f4dbeac0a39e15d2fbc8e917741b5b7c >> git bisect bad cf33d96f50903214226b379b3f10d1f262dae018 >> git bisect good 12e070eb6964b341b41677fd260af5a305316a1f >> git bisect bad 6917d207b469ee81e6dc7f8ccca29c234a16916d >> git bisect good 4fefbc66dfb356145633e571475be2459d73ce16 >> git bisect bad a6ac667467b642c94928c24ac2eb40d20110983c >> git bisect bad b05d30c2b6df7e2172b18bf1baee9b202f9c6b53 >> git bisect good 56dcbf0b520796e26b2bbe5686bdd305ad924954 >> git bisect bad d302ac65ac938516487f57ae20f11e9cf6327606 >> git bisect good 8c2143702d0719a0357600bca0236900781ffc78 >> git bisect good a5686ae820fa7ab03226a3b0ff529720b7bac599 >> git bisect bad 6f245ea0ec6c29b90c8fa4fdf6e178c646125d7e >> git bisect bad 46d16f7e1d1413ad7ff99c1334d8874623717745 >> --- >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c >> index 0606116d6b9c491b6ede401b2e1aedfb619339a8..33aba5fceec946fad5a47a11a4d86b7be96e682e 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c >> @@ -1927,7 +1927,7 @@ struct ath12k_base *ath12k_core_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t priv_size, >> ab->dev = dev; >> ab->hif.bus = bus; >> ab->qmi.num_radios = U8_MAX; >> - ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; >> + ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = true; >> >> /* Device index used to identify the devices in a group. >> * >> >> --- >> base-commit: 7eb172143d5508b4da468ed59ee857c6e5e01da6 >> change-id: 20250303-topic-ath12k-fix-crash-49e9055c61a1 >> >> Best regards, > > NAK since this will break QCN > There is a series under internal review to address MLO issues for WCN chipsets ??? The original commit is wrong, this fixes the conversion, nothing else. Neil >
On 3/19/2025 1:34 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote: > On 18/03/2025 17:35, Jeff Johnson wrote: >> On 3/3/2025 7:00 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote: >>> In commit 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to single_chip_mlo_supp") >>> the line: >>> ab->mlo_capable_flags = ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; >>> was incorrectly updated to: >>> ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; >>> leading to always disabling INTRA_DEVICE_MLO even if the device supports it. >>> >>> The firmware "WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1" >>> crashes on driver initialization with: >>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: chip_id 0x2 chip_family 0x4 board_id 0x3d soc_id 0x40170200 >>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x110f009c fw_build_timestamp 2024-05-30 11:35 >>> fw_build_id QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1 >>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: ignore reset dev flags 0x200 >>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to receive wmi unified ready event: -110 >>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to start core: -110 >>> failed to send QMI message >>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: qmi failed to send mode request, mode: 4, err = -5 >>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: qmi failed to send wlan mode off >>> >>> With ab->single_chip_mlo_supp set to True, firmware loads nominally. >>> >>> Fixes: 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to single_chip_mlo_supp") >>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> >>> --- >>> Bisect log for reference: >>> The bisect leaded to: >>> git bisect start 'v6.14-rc4' 'v6.12' >>> git bisect good 5757b31666277e2b177b406e48878dc48d587a46 >>> git bisect bad d78794d4f4dbeac0a39e15d2fbc8e917741b5b7c >>> git bisect bad cf33d96f50903214226b379b3f10d1f262dae018 >>> git bisect good 12e070eb6964b341b41677fd260af5a305316a1f >>> git bisect bad 6917d207b469ee81e6dc7f8ccca29c234a16916d >>> git bisect good 4fefbc66dfb356145633e571475be2459d73ce16 >>> git bisect bad a6ac667467b642c94928c24ac2eb40d20110983c >>> git bisect bad b05d30c2b6df7e2172b18bf1baee9b202f9c6b53 >>> git bisect good 56dcbf0b520796e26b2bbe5686bdd305ad924954 >>> git bisect bad d302ac65ac938516487f57ae20f11e9cf6327606 >>> git bisect good 8c2143702d0719a0357600bca0236900781ffc78 >>> git bisect good a5686ae820fa7ab03226a3b0ff529720b7bac599 >>> git bisect bad 6f245ea0ec6c29b90c8fa4fdf6e178c646125d7e >>> git bisect bad 46d16f7e1d1413ad7ff99c1334d8874623717745 >>> --- >>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c >>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c >>> index >>> 0606116d6b9c491b6ede401b2e1aedfb619339a8..33aba5fceec946fad5a47a11a4d86b7be96e682e 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c >>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c >>> @@ -1927,7 +1927,7 @@ struct ath12k_base *ath12k_core_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t >>> priv_size, >>> ab->dev = dev; >>> ab->hif.bus = bus; >>> ab->qmi.num_radios = U8_MAX; >>> - ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; >>> + ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = true; >>> /* Device index used to identify the devices in a group. >>> * >>> >>> --- >>> base-commit: 7eb172143d5508b4da468ed59ee857c6e5e01da6 >>> change-id: 20250303-topic-ath12k-fix-crash-49e9055c61a1 >>> >>> Best regards, >> >> NAK since this will break QCN >> There is a series under internal review to address MLO issues for WCN chipsets > > ??? > > The original commit is wrong, this fixes the conversion, nothing else. Nope. Driver changes to enable MLO with WCN chipset are not there yet. Setting the mlo capability flag without having required driver changes for WCN chipset will likely result in firmware crash. So the recommendation is to enable MLO (in WCN) only when all the necessary driver changes (in development, public posting in near future) are in place. Vasanth
Hi, On 19/03/2025 10:06, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: > > > On 3/19/2025 1:34 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote: >> On 18/03/2025 17:35, Jeff Johnson wrote: >>> On 3/3/2025 7:00 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote: >>>> In commit 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to single_chip_mlo_supp") >>>> the line: >>>> ab->mlo_capable_flags = ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; >>>> was incorrectly updated to: >>>> ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; >>>> leading to always disabling INTRA_DEVICE_MLO even if the device supports it. >>>> >>>> The firmware "WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1" >>>> crashes on driver initialization with: >>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: chip_id 0x2 chip_family 0x4 board_id 0x3d soc_id 0x40170200 >>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x110f009c fw_build_timestamp 2024-05-30 11:35 fw_build_id QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1 >>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: ignore reset dev flags 0x200 >>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to receive wmi unified ready event: -110 >>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to start core: -110 >>>> failed to send QMI message >>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: qmi failed to send mode request, mode: 4, err = -5 >>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: qmi failed to send wlan mode off >>>> >>>> With ab->single_chip_mlo_supp set to True, firmware loads nominally. >>>> >>>> Fixes: 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to single_chip_mlo_supp") >>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> >>>> --- >>>> Bisect log for reference: >>>> The bisect leaded to: >>>> git bisect start 'v6.14-rc4' 'v6.12' >>>> git bisect good 5757b31666277e2b177b406e48878dc48d587a46 >>>> git bisect bad d78794d4f4dbeac0a39e15d2fbc8e917741b5b7c >>>> git bisect bad cf33d96f50903214226b379b3f10d1f262dae018 >>>> git bisect good 12e070eb6964b341b41677fd260af5a305316a1f >>>> git bisect bad 6917d207b469ee81e6dc7f8ccca29c234a16916d >>>> git bisect good 4fefbc66dfb356145633e571475be2459d73ce16 >>>> git bisect bad a6ac667467b642c94928c24ac2eb40d20110983c >>>> git bisect bad b05d30c2b6df7e2172b18bf1baee9b202f9c6b53 >>>> git bisect good 56dcbf0b520796e26b2bbe5686bdd305ad924954 >>>> git bisect bad d302ac65ac938516487f57ae20f11e9cf6327606 >>>> git bisect good 8c2143702d0719a0357600bca0236900781ffc78 >>>> git bisect good a5686ae820fa7ab03226a3b0ff529720b7bac599 >>>> git bisect bad 6f245ea0ec6c29b90c8fa4fdf6e178c646125d7e >>>> git bisect bad 46d16f7e1d1413ad7ff99c1334d8874623717745 >>>> --- >>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c | 2 +- >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c >>>> index 0606116d6b9c491b6ede401b2e1aedfb619339a8..33aba5fceec946fad5a47a11a4d86b7be96e682e 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c >>>> @@ -1927,7 +1927,7 @@ struct ath12k_base *ath12k_core_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t priv_size, >>>> ab->dev = dev; >>>> ab->hif.bus = bus; >>>> ab->qmi.num_radios = U8_MAX; >>>> - ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; >>>> + ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = true; >>>> /* Device index used to identify the devices in a group. >>>> * >>>> >>>> --- >>>> base-commit: 7eb172143d5508b4da468ed59ee857c6e5e01da6 >>>> change-id: 20250303-topic-ath12k-fix-crash-49e9055c61a1 >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>> >>> NAK since this will break QCN >>> There is a series under internal review to address MLO issues for WCN chipsets >> >> ??? >> >> The original commit is wrong, this fixes the conversion, nothing else. > > Nope. Driver changes to enable MLO with WCN chipset are not there yet. > Setting the mlo capability flag without having required driver changes > for WCN chipset will likely result in firmware crash. So the recommendation > is to enable MLO (in WCN) only when all the necessary driver changes > (in development, public posting in near future) are in place. Right, I understand clearly, _but_ before 46d16f7e1d14 the firmware was _not_ crashing, and 46d16f7e1d14 causes a regression because single_chip_mlo_supp was set to false instead of true. So if you read the commit message, it clearly explains the regression, and the reason of the patch. This has nothing to do with enabling MLO, it fixes a regression on mainline for current users. #regzbot introduced: 46d16f7e1d14 Neil > > Vasanth
On 3/19/2025 5:12 PM, neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote: > Hi, > > On 19/03/2025 10:06, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >> >> >> On 3/19/2025 1:34 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote: >>> On 18/03/2025 17:35, Jeff Johnson wrote: >>>> On 3/3/2025 7:00 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote: >>>>> In commit 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to >>>>> single_chip_mlo_supp") >>>>> the line: >>>>> ab->mlo_capable_flags = ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; >>>>> was incorrectly updated to: >>>>> ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; >>>>> leading to always disabling INTRA_DEVICE_MLO even if the device supports it. >>>>> >>>>> The firmware "WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1" >>>>> crashes on driver initialization with: >>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: chip_id 0x2 chip_family 0x4 board_id 0x3d soc_id 0x40170200 >>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x110f009c fw_build_timestamp 2024-05-30 11:35 >>>>> fw_build_id QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156- >>>>> QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1 this FW version is not upstream yet, why are you testing with it? Generally we only support upstrmea driver + upstream FW. >>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: ignore reset dev flags 0x200 >>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to receive wmi unified ready event: -110 >>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to start core: -110 >>>>> failed to send QMI message >>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: qmi failed to send mode request, mode: 4, err = -5 >>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: qmi failed to send wlan mode off >>>>> >>>>> With ab->single_chip_mlo_supp set to True, firmware loads nominally. >>>>> >>>>> Fixes: 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to single_chip_mlo_supp") >>>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> >>>>> --- >>>>> Bisect log for reference: >>>>> The bisect leaded to: >>>>> git bisect start 'v6.14-rc4' 'v6.12' >>>>> git bisect good 5757b31666277e2b177b406e48878dc48d587a46 >>>>> git bisect bad d78794d4f4dbeac0a39e15d2fbc8e917741b5b7c >>>>> git bisect bad cf33d96f50903214226b379b3f10d1f262dae018 >>>>> git bisect good 12e070eb6964b341b41677fd260af5a305316a1f >>>>> git bisect bad 6917d207b469ee81e6dc7f8ccca29c234a16916d >>>>> git bisect good 4fefbc66dfb356145633e571475be2459d73ce16 >>>>> git bisect bad a6ac667467b642c94928c24ac2eb40d20110983c >>>>> git bisect bad b05d30c2b6df7e2172b18bf1baee9b202f9c6b53 >>>>> git bisect good 56dcbf0b520796e26b2bbe5686bdd305ad924954 >>>>> git bisect bad d302ac65ac938516487f57ae20f11e9cf6327606 >>>>> git bisect good 8c2143702d0719a0357600bca0236900781ffc78 >>>>> git bisect good a5686ae820fa7ab03226a3b0ff529720b7bac599 >>>>> git bisect bad 6f245ea0ec6c29b90c8fa4fdf6e178c646125d7e >>>>> git bisect bad 46d16f7e1d1413ad7ff99c1334d8874623717745 >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c | 2 +- >>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ >>>>> ath12k/core.c >>>>> index >>>>> 0606116d6b9c491b6ede401b2e1aedfb619339a8..33aba5fceec946fad5a47a11a4d86b7be96e682e >>>>> 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c >>>>> @@ -1927,7 +1927,7 @@ struct ath12k_base *ath12k_core_alloc(struct device *dev, >>>>> size_t priv_size, >>>>> ab->dev = dev; >>>>> ab->hif.bus = bus; >>>>> ab->qmi.num_radios = U8_MAX; >>>>> - ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; >>>>> + ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = true; >>>>> /* Device index used to identify the devices in a group. >>>>> * >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> base-commit: 7eb172143d5508b4da468ed59ee857c6e5e01da6 >>>>> change-id: 20250303-topic-ath12k-fix-crash-49e9055c61a1 >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> NAK since this will break QCN >>>> There is a series under internal review to address MLO issues for WCN chipsets >>> >>> ??? >>> >>> The original commit is wrong, this fixes the conversion, nothing else. >> >> Nope. Driver changes to enable MLO with WCN chipset are not there yet. >> Setting the mlo capability flag without having required driver changes >> for WCN chipset will likely result in firmware crash. So the recommendation >> is to enable MLO (in WCN) only when all the necessary driver changes >> (in development, public posting in near future) are in place. > > Right, I understand clearly, _but_ before 46d16f7e1d14 the firmware > was _not_ crashing, and 46d16f7e1d14 causes a regression because > single_chip_mlo_supp was set to false instead of true. > > So if you read the commit message, it clearly explains the regression, > and the reason of the patch. > > This has nothing to do with enabling MLO, it fixes a regression > on mainline for current users. > > #regzbot introduced: 46d16f7e1d14 > > Neil > >> >> Vasanth > >
Hi, On 19/03/2025 10:46, Baochen Qiang wrote: > > > On 3/19/2025 5:12 PM, neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 19/03/2025 10:06, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 3/19/2025 1:34 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote: >>>> On 18/03/2025 17:35, Jeff Johnson wrote: >>>>> On 3/3/2025 7:00 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote: >>>>>> In commit 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to >>>>>> single_chip_mlo_supp") >>>>>> the line: >>>>>> ab->mlo_capable_flags = ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; >>>>>> was incorrectly updated to: >>>>>> ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; >>>>>> leading to always disabling INTRA_DEVICE_MLO even if the device supports it. >>>>>> >>>>>> The firmware "WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1" >>>>>> crashes on driver initialization with: >>>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: chip_id 0x2 chip_family 0x4 board_id 0x3d soc_id 0x40170200 >>>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x110f009c fw_build_timestamp 2024-05-30 11:35 >>>>>> fw_build_id QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156- >>>>>> QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1 > > this FW version is not upstream yet, why are you testing with it? I was not aware the driver supported only a small subset of firmwares. > > Generally we only support upstrmea driver + upstream FW. In this case, change the driver to only support those exact firmware versions, or print a warning in case we try to load a non-mainline-supported firmware. But if you did read the commit message, the commit 46d16f7e1d14 is bogus, the single_chip_mlo_supp should be set to true to keep the driver behavior prior of commit 46d16f7e1d14. It happens to trigger the crash with this firmware, but the code behavior was changed by commit 46d16f7e1d14, which should be fixed. This is the whole point of this patch, fix a regression on the mainline tree for existing users. Neil > > >>>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: ignore reset dev flags 0x200 >>>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to receive wmi unified ready event: -110 >>>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to start core: -110 >>>>>> failed to send QMI message >>>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: qmi failed to send mode request, mode: 4, err = -5 >>>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: qmi failed to send wlan mode off >>>>>> >>>>>> With ab->single_chip_mlo_supp set to True, firmware loads nominally. >>>>>> >>>>>> Fixes: 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to single_chip_mlo_supp") >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> Bisect log for reference: >>>>>> The bisect leaded to: >>>>>> git bisect start 'v6.14-rc4' 'v6.12' >>>>>> git bisect good 5757b31666277e2b177b406e48878dc48d587a46 >>>>>> git bisect bad d78794d4f4dbeac0a39e15d2fbc8e917741b5b7c >>>>>> git bisect bad cf33d96f50903214226b379b3f10d1f262dae018 >>>>>> git bisect good 12e070eb6964b341b41677fd260af5a305316a1f >>>>>> git bisect bad 6917d207b469ee81e6dc7f8ccca29c234a16916d >>>>>> git bisect good 4fefbc66dfb356145633e571475be2459d73ce16 >>>>>> git bisect bad a6ac667467b642c94928c24ac2eb40d20110983c >>>>>> git bisect bad b05d30c2b6df7e2172b18bf1baee9b202f9c6b53 >>>>>> git bisect good 56dcbf0b520796e26b2bbe5686bdd305ad924954 >>>>>> git bisect bad d302ac65ac938516487f57ae20f11e9cf6327606 >>>>>> git bisect good 8c2143702d0719a0357600bca0236900781ffc78 >>>>>> git bisect good a5686ae820fa7ab03226a3b0ff529720b7bac599 >>>>>> git bisect bad 6f245ea0ec6c29b90c8fa4fdf6e178c646125d7e >>>>>> git bisect bad 46d16f7e1d1413ad7ff99c1334d8874623717745 >>>>>> --- >>>>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c | 2 +- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ >>>>>> ath12k/core.c >>>>>> index >>>>>> 0606116d6b9c491b6ede401b2e1aedfb619339a8..33aba5fceec946fad5a47a11a4d86b7be96e682e >>>>>> 100644 >>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c >>>>>> @@ -1927,7 +1927,7 @@ struct ath12k_base *ath12k_core_alloc(struct device *dev, >>>>>> size_t priv_size, >>>>>> ab->dev = dev; >>>>>> ab->hif.bus = bus; >>>>>> ab->qmi.num_radios = U8_MAX; >>>>>> - ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; >>>>>> + ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = true; >>>>>> /* Device index used to identify the devices in a group. >>>>>> * >>>>>> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> base-commit: 7eb172143d5508b4da468ed59ee857c6e5e01da6 >>>>>> change-id: 20250303-topic-ath12k-fix-crash-49e9055c61a1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>>> NAK since this will break QCN >>>>> There is a series under internal review to address MLO issues for WCN chipsets >>>> >>>> ??? >>>> >>>> The original commit is wrong, this fixes the conversion, nothing else. >>> >>> Nope. Driver changes to enable MLO with WCN chipset are not there yet. >>> Setting the mlo capability flag without having required driver changes >>> for WCN chipset will likely result in firmware crash. So the recommendation >>> is to enable MLO (in WCN) only when all the necessary driver changes >>> (in development, public posting in near future) are in place. >> >> Right, I understand clearly, _but_ before 46d16f7e1d14 the firmware >> was _not_ crashing, and 46d16f7e1d14 causes a regression because >> single_chip_mlo_supp was set to false instead of true. >> >> So if you read the commit message, it clearly explains the regression, >> and the reason of the patch. >> >> This has nothing to do with enabling MLO, it fixes a regression >> on mainline for current users. >> >> #regzbot introduced: 46d16f7e1d14 >> >> Neil >> >>> >>> Vasanth >> >> >
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 11:00:34AM +0100, neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote: > Hi, > > On 19/03/2025 10:46, Baochen Qiang wrote: > > > > > > On 3/19/2025 5:12 PM, neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 19/03/2025 10:06, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/19/2025 1:34 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote: > > > > > On 18/03/2025 17:35, Jeff Johnson wrote: > > > > > > On 3/3/2025 7:00 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote: > > > > > > > In commit 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to > > > > > > > single_chip_mlo_supp") > > > > > > > the line: > > > > > > > ab->mlo_capable_flags = ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; > > > > > > > was incorrectly updated to: > > > > > > > ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; > > > > > > > leading to always disabling INTRA_DEVICE_MLO even if the device supports it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The firmware "WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1" > > > > > > > crashes on driver initialization with: > > > > > > > ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: chip_id 0x2 chip_family 0x4 board_id 0x3d soc_id 0x40170200 > > > > > > > ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x110f009c fw_build_timestamp 2024-05-30 11:35 > > > > > > > fw_build_id QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156- > > > > > > > QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1 > > > > this FW version is not upstream yet, why are you testing with it? > > I was not aware the driver supported only a small subset of firmwares. Yes, this has been communicated by Kalle (and now by Jeff) for ages: using any firmware outside of linux-firmware is not supported, unless you have been explicitly told to use a particular binary. Firmware coming from the Android / Mobile might use different knobs and have different expectations regarding driver behaviour.
On 19/03/2025 11:18, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 11:00:34AM +0100, neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 19/03/2025 10:46, Baochen Qiang wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 3/19/2025 5:12 PM, neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On 19/03/2025 10:06, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 3/19/2025 1:34 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote: >>>>>> On 18/03/2025 17:35, Jeff Johnson wrote: >>>>>>> On 3/3/2025 7:00 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote: >>>>>>>> In commit 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to >>>>>>>> single_chip_mlo_supp") >>>>>>>> the line: >>>>>>>> ab->mlo_capable_flags = ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; >>>>>>>> was incorrectly updated to: >>>>>>>> ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; >>>>>>>> leading to always disabling INTRA_DEVICE_MLO even if the device supports it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The firmware "WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1" >>>>>>>> crashes on driver initialization with: >>>>>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: chip_id 0x2 chip_family 0x4 board_id 0x3d soc_id 0x40170200 >>>>>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x110f009c fw_build_timestamp 2024-05-30 11:35 >>>>>>>> fw_build_id QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156- >>>>>>>> QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1 >>> >>> this FW version is not upstream yet, why are you testing with it? >> >> I was not aware the driver supported only a small subset of firmwares. > > Yes, this has been communicated by Kalle (and now by Jeff) for ages: > using any firmware outside of linux-firmware is not supported, unless > you have been explicitly told to use a particular binary. Firmware > coming from the Android / Mobile might use different knobs and have > different expectations regarding driver behaviour. > The patch remain valid nevertheless, the 46d16f7e1d14 changeset remains bogus and needs to be fixed whatever the firmware version or ongoing work to fix MLO in the future. Neil
On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 at 12:22, <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 19/03/2025 11:18, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 11:00:34AM +0100, neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 19/03/2025 10:46, Baochen Qiang wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On 3/19/2025 5:12 PM, neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> On 19/03/2025 10:06, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 3/19/2025 1:34 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote: > >>>>>> On 18/03/2025 17:35, Jeff Johnson wrote: > >>>>>>> On 3/3/2025 7:00 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote: > >>>>>>>> In commit 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to > >>>>>>>> single_chip_mlo_supp") > >>>>>>>> the line: > >>>>>>>> ab->mlo_capable_flags = ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; > >>>>>>>> was incorrectly updated to: > >>>>>>>> ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; > >>>>>>>> leading to always disabling INTRA_DEVICE_MLO even if the device supports it. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The firmware "WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1" > >>>>>>>> crashes on driver initialization with: > >>>>>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: chip_id 0x2 chip_family 0x4 board_id 0x3d soc_id 0x40170200 > >>>>>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x110f009c fw_build_timestamp 2024-05-30 11:35 > >>>>>>>> fw_build_id QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156- > >>>>>>>> QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1 > >>> > >>> this FW version is not upstream yet, why are you testing with it? > >> > >> I was not aware the driver supported only a small subset of firmwares. > > > > Yes, this has been communicated by Kalle (and now by Jeff) for ages: > > using any firmware outside of linux-firmware is not supported, unless > > you have been explicitly told to use a particular binary. Firmware > > coming from the Android / Mobile might use different knobs and have > > different expectations regarding driver behaviour. > > > > The patch remain valid nevertheless, the 46d16f7e1d14 changeset remains > bogus and needs to be fixed whatever the firmware version or ongoing work > to fix MLO in the future. Maybe. I'm not discussing the patch validity, I barely wanted to point out the firmware requirements.
On 19/03/2025 10:06, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >>>> --- >>>> base-commit: 7eb172143d5508b4da468ed59ee857c6e5e01da6 >>>> change-id: 20250303-topic-ath12k-fix-crash-49e9055c61a1 >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>> >>> NAK since this will break QCN >>> There is a series under internal review to address MLO issues for WCN chipsets >> >> ??? >> >> The original commit is wrong, this fixes the conversion, nothing else. > > Nope. Driver changes to enable MLO with WCN chipset are not there yet. > Setting the mlo capability flag without having required driver changes > for WCN chipset will likely result in firmware crash. So the recommendation > is to enable MLO (in WCN) only when all the necessary driver changes > (in development, public posting in near future) are in place. Really, these are your answers? There is regression and first reply is upstream should wait for whatever you do internally. Second answer is the same - public posting in near future? Can you start working with the upstream instead? Best regards, Krzysztof
On 19/03/2025 10:46, Baochen Qiang wrote: > > > On 3/19/2025 5:12 PM, neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 19/03/2025 10:06, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 3/19/2025 1:34 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote: >>>> On 18/03/2025 17:35, Jeff Johnson wrote: >>>>> On 3/3/2025 7:00 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote: >>>>>> In commit 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to >>>>>> single_chip_mlo_supp") >>>>>> the line: >>>>>> ab->mlo_capable_flags = ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; >>>>>> was incorrectly updated to: >>>>>> ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; >>>>>> leading to always disabling INTRA_DEVICE_MLO even if the device supports it. >>>>>> >>>>>> The firmware "WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1" >>>>>> crashes on driver initialization with: >>>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: chip_id 0x2 chip_family 0x4 board_id 0x3d soc_id 0x40170200 >>>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x110f009c fw_build_timestamp 2024-05-30 11:35 >>>>>> fw_build_id QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156- >>>>>> QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1 > > this FW version is not upstream yet, why are you testing with it? > > Generally we only support upstrmea driver + upstream FW. FW does not have to be upstream. We work, here in upstream, with all sort of vendors and all sorts of devices, for which vendors might not send yet their FW or we are unclear about licensing rules. Regression is still regression and stop deflecting the discussion - third response now! - what you internally want to achieve. Upstream does not care about your internal processes. Best regards, Krzysztof
On 19/03/2025 11:18, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 11:00:34AM +0100, neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 19/03/2025 10:46, Baochen Qiang wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 3/19/2025 5:12 PM, neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On 19/03/2025 10:06, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 3/19/2025 1:34 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote: >>>>>> On 18/03/2025 17:35, Jeff Johnson wrote: >>>>>>> On 3/3/2025 7:00 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote: >>>>>>>> In commit 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to >>>>>>>> single_chip_mlo_supp") >>>>>>>> the line: >>>>>>>> ab->mlo_capable_flags = ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; >>>>>>>> was incorrectly updated to: >>>>>>>> ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; >>>>>>>> leading to always disabling INTRA_DEVICE_MLO even if the device supports it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The firmware "WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1" >>>>>>>> crashes on driver initialization with: >>>>>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: chip_id 0x2 chip_family 0x4 board_id 0x3d soc_id 0x40170200 >>>>>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x110f009c fw_build_timestamp 2024-05-30 11:35 >>>>>>>> fw_build_id QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156- >>>>>>>> QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1 >>> >>> this FW version is not upstream yet, why are you testing with it? >> >> I was not aware the driver supported only a small subset of firmwares. > > Yes, this has been communicated by Kalle (and now by Jeff) for ages: > using any firmware outside of linux-firmware is not supported, unless > you have been explicitly told to use a particular binary. Firmware > coming from the Android / Mobile might use different knobs and have > different expectations regarding driver behaviour. Sure, fine, but that's not what is happening here. Look at the replies from Qualcomm - not responding to actual issue here but instantly rejecting a patch for regression just on basis of: 1. "series under internal review to address MLO issues" 2. "when all the necessary driver changes (in development, public posting in near future)" 3. "Generally we only support upstrmea driver + upstream FW." Instead of talking about actual problem, I see only avoidance of responsibility and just sticking to whatever they have planned internally. That's not how work with upstream is done and is really disappointing to see. Remember Tuxedo computers folks who said we want to control usptream process, thus we will release source code under incompatible license to prohibit community from working on their own. This is the same Qualcomm behavior. Best regards, Krzysztof
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 11:33:41AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 19/03/2025 11:18, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 11:00:34AM +0100, neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 19/03/2025 10:46, Baochen Qiang wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On 3/19/2025 5:12 PM, neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> On 19/03/2025 10:06, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 3/19/2025 1:34 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote: > >>>>>> On 18/03/2025 17:35, Jeff Johnson wrote: > >>>>>>> On 3/3/2025 7:00 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote: > >>>>>>>> In commit 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to > >>>>>>>> single_chip_mlo_supp") > >>>>>>>> the line: > >>>>>>>> ab->mlo_capable_flags = ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; > >>>>>>>> was incorrectly updated to: > >>>>>>>> ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; > >>>>>>>> leading to always disabling INTRA_DEVICE_MLO even if the device supports it. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The firmware "WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1" > >>>>>>>> crashes on driver initialization with: > >>>>>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: chip_id 0x2 chip_family 0x4 board_id 0x3d soc_id 0x40170200 > >>>>>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x110f009c fw_build_timestamp 2024-05-30 11:35 > >>>>>>>> fw_build_id QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156- > >>>>>>>> QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1 > >>> > >>> this FW version is not upstream yet, why are you testing with it? > >> > >> I was not aware the driver supported only a small subset of firmwares. > > > > Yes, this has been communicated by Kalle (and now by Jeff) for ages: > > using any firmware outside of linux-firmware is not supported, unless > > you have been explicitly told to use a particular binary. Firmware > > coming from the Android / Mobile might use different knobs and have > > different expectations regarding driver behaviour. > Sure, fine, but that's not what is happening here. Look at the replies > from Qualcomm - not responding to actual issue here but instantly > rejecting a patch for regression just on basis of: > > 1. "series under internal review to address MLO issues" > 2. "when all the necessary driver changes > (in development, public posting in near future)" These two are invalid, I agree here. > 3. "Generally we only support upstrmea driver + upstream FW." This one is valid. Different firmware versions have different behaviour. Android drivers, WIP drivers, etc. might have different behaviour, which works with a particular firmware build. Upstream driver is not expected to work with those firmware builds. At Linaro we have had these kind of issues and the response from Kalle has always been the same: use the supported firmware if you are reporting issues. > Instead of talking about actual problem, I see only avoidance of > responsibility and just sticking to whatever they have planned internally. > > That's not how work with upstream is done and is really disappointing to > see. > > Remember Tuxedo computers folks who said we want to control usptream > process, thus we will release source code under incompatible license to > prohibit community from working on their own. > > This is the same Qualcomm behavior. It's a different story. If the commit in question has caused driver issues (e.g. kernel crash), it would have been a valid issue. It causes an issue in the firmware, which is not supported. If I were working on ath drivers, asking to reproduce the issue with the supported firmware would be one of the first items. First reponses are disappointing, I agree.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 11:29:18AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 19/03/2025 10:46, Baochen Qiang wrote: > > > > > > On 3/19/2025 5:12 PM, neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 19/03/2025 10:06, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On 3/19/2025 1:34 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote: > >>>> On 18/03/2025 17:35, Jeff Johnson wrote: > >>>>> On 3/3/2025 7:00 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote: > >>>>>> In commit 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to > >>>>>> single_chip_mlo_supp") > >>>>>> the line: > >>>>>> ab->mlo_capable_flags = ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; > >>>>>> was incorrectly updated to: > >>>>>> ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; > >>>>>> leading to always disabling INTRA_DEVICE_MLO even if the device supports it. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The firmware "WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1" > >>>>>> crashes on driver initialization with: > >>>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: chip_id 0x2 chip_family 0x4 board_id 0x3d soc_id 0x40170200 > >>>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x110f009c fw_build_timestamp 2024-05-30 11:35 > >>>>>> fw_build_id QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156- > >>>>>> QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1 > > > > this FW version is not upstream yet, why are you testing with it? > > > > Generally we only support upstrmea driver + upstream FW. > FW does not have to be upstream. We work, here in upstream, with all > sort of vendors and all sorts of devices, for which vendors might not > send yet their FW or we are unclear about licensing rules. If you are working with non-supported firmware, then, basically, you are on your own. I think you'd get the same response from any other vendor shipping firmware files. Consider reporting an issue to i915 or amdgpu driver _and_ stating that you are using some non-standard firmware files that were not provided to you by the corresponding team. > Regression is still regression and stop deflecting the discussion - > third response now! - what you internally want to achieve. > > Upstream does not care about your internal processes.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 11:00:34AM +0100, neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote: > Hi, > > On 19/03/2025 10:46, Baochen Qiang wrote: > > > > > > On 3/19/2025 5:12 PM, neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 19/03/2025 10:06, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/19/2025 1:34 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote: > > > > > On 18/03/2025 17:35, Jeff Johnson wrote: > > > > > > On 3/3/2025 7:00 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote: > > > > > > > In commit 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to > > > > > > > single_chip_mlo_supp") > > > > > > > the line: > > > > > > > ab->mlo_capable_flags = ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; > > > > > > > was incorrectly updated to: > > > > > > > ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; > > > > > > > leading to always disabling INTRA_DEVICE_MLO even if the device supports it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The firmware "WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1" > > > > > > > crashes on driver initialization with: > > > > > > > ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: chip_id 0x2 chip_family 0x4 board_id 0x3d soc_id 0x40170200 > > > > > > > ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x110f009c fw_build_timestamp 2024-05-30 11:35 > > > > > > > fw_build_id QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156- > > > > > > > QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1 > > > > this FW version is not upstream yet, why are you testing with it? > > I was not aware the driver supported only a small subset of firmwares. > > > > > Generally we only support upstrmea driver + upstream FW. > > In this case, change the driver to only support those exact firmware versions, > or print a warning in case we try to load a non-mainline-supported firmware. > > But if you did read the commit message, the commit 46d16f7e1d14 is bogus, the > single_chip_mlo_supp should be set to true to keep the driver behavior prior > of commit 46d16f7e1d14. It happens to trigger the crash with this firmware, > but the code behavior was changed by commit 46d16f7e1d14, which should be fixed. Now to the change itself. I have checked the referened commit. It's behaviour doesn't match commit message. It tells: "For the WCN7850 family of chipsets, since the event is not supported, assumption is made that single chip MLO is supported.", however the contents of the commit doesn't match this. As such, I'd support the patch, it looks corect to me, despite being used with the non-supported firmware. > This is the whole point of this patch, fix a regression on the mainline tree > for existing users.
On 3/19/2025 3:57 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 19/03/2025 10:06, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >>>>> --- >>>>> base-commit: 7eb172143d5508b4da468ed59ee857c6e5e01da6 >>>>> change-id: 20250303-topic-ath12k-fix-crash-49e9055c61a1 >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> NAK since this will break QCN >>>> There is a series under internal review to address MLO issues for WCN chipsets >>> >>> ??? >>> >>> The original commit is wrong, this fixes the conversion, nothing else. >> >> Nope. Driver changes to enable MLO with WCN chipset are not there yet. >> Setting the mlo capability flag without having required driver changes >> for WCN chipset will likely result in firmware crash. So the recommendation >> is to enable MLO (in WCN) only when all the necessary driver changes >> (in development, public posting in near future) are in place. > Really, these are your answers? There is regression and first reply is > upstream should wait for whatever you do internally. Second answer is > the same - public posting in near future? > May be I was not clear in my response. I was not telling MLO bug fixes were in the development. Actually the MLO feature itself is not enabled yet with WCN chip sets. Any code changes enabling it without full feature support would result in firmware crashes with the existing firmware binaries available in upstream. Vasanth
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 05:02:39PM +0530, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: > > > On 3/19/2025 3:57 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 19/03/2025 10:06, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: > > > > > > --- > > > > > > base-commit: 7eb172143d5508b4da468ed59ee857c6e5e01da6 > > > > > > change-id: 20250303-topic-ath12k-fix-crash-49e9055c61a1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > NAK since this will break QCN > > > > > There is a series under internal review to address MLO issues for WCN chipsets > > > > > > > > ??? > > > > > > > > The original commit is wrong, this fixes the conversion, nothing else. > > > > > > Nope. Driver changes to enable MLO with WCN chipset are not there yet. > > > Setting the mlo capability flag without having required driver changes > > > for WCN chipset will likely result in firmware crash. So the recommendation > > > is to enable MLO (in WCN) only when all the necessary driver changes > > > (in development, public posting in near future) are in place. > > Really, these are your answers? There is regression and first reply is > > upstream should wait for whatever you do internally. Second answer is > > the same - public posting in near future? > > > > May be I was not clear in my response. I was not telling MLO bug fixes were > in the development. Actually the MLO feature itself is not enabled > yet with WCN chip sets. Any code changes enabling it without full feature > support would result in firmware crashes with the existing firmware binaries > available in upstream. Is there an undocumented change of the behaviour in the commit 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to single_chip_mlo_supp")?
On 3/19/2025 5:21 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 05:02:39PM +0530, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >> >> >> On 3/19/2025 3:57 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 19/03/2025 10:06, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> base-commit: 7eb172143d5508b4da468ed59ee857c6e5e01da6 >>>>>>> change-id: 20250303-topic-ath12k-fix-crash-49e9055c61a1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> NAK since this will break QCN >>>>>> There is a series under internal review to address MLO issues for WCN chipsets >>>>> >>>>> ??? >>>>> >>>>> The original commit is wrong, this fixes the conversion, nothing else. >>>> >>>> Nope. Driver changes to enable MLO with WCN chipset are not there yet. >>>> Setting the mlo capability flag without having required driver changes >>>> for WCN chipset will likely result in firmware crash. So the recommendation >>>> is to enable MLO (in WCN) only when all the necessary driver changes >>>> (in development, public posting in near future) are in place. >>> Really, these are your answers? There is regression and first reply is >>> upstream should wait for whatever you do internally. Second answer is >>> the same - public posting in near future? >>> >> >> May be I was not clear in my response. I was not telling MLO bug fixes were >> in the development. Actually the MLO feature itself is not enabled >> yet with WCN chip sets. Any code changes enabling it without full feature >> support would result in firmware crashes with the existing firmware binaries >> available in upstream. > > Is there an undocumented change of the behaviour in the commit > 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to > single_chip_mlo_supp")? > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/qmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/qmi.c - if (resp.single_chip_mlo_support_valid) { - if (resp.single_chip_mlo_support) - ab->mlo_capable_flags |= ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; - else - ab->mlo_capable_flags &= ~ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; - } The above logic seems to keep the initialized intra MLO support even when single_chip_mlo_support_valid is not set. The above code removal is correct as MLO support can not be enabled in host when firmware does not advertise it. diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c + ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/qmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/qmi.c + if (resp.single_chip_mlo_support_valid && + resp.single_chip_mlo_support) + ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = true; The above code does it in right way. Overriding firmware MLO capability as done in the submitted patch under review is obviously wrong. The firmware used to report the issue seems to have an odd behavior: 1. it does not seem to advertise MLO capability in single_chip_mlo_support bit and 2. expects configurations to enable MLO from host. None of the WCN firmware available in upstream either advertises MLO capability or expects configurations to enable MLO from host. Vasanth
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 06:24:57PM +0530, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: > > > On 3/19/2025 5:21 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 05:02:39PM +0530, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 3/19/2025 3:57 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > On 19/03/2025 10:06, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > base-commit: 7eb172143d5508b4da468ed59ee857c6e5e01da6 > > > > > > > > change-id: 20250303-topic-ath12k-fix-crash-49e9055c61a1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NAK since this will break QCN > > > > > > > There is a series under internal review to address MLO issues for WCN chipsets > > > > > > > > > > > > ??? > > > > > > > > > > > > The original commit is wrong, this fixes the conversion, nothing else. > > > > > > > > > > Nope. Driver changes to enable MLO with WCN chipset are not there yet. > > > > > Setting the mlo capability flag without having required driver changes > > > > > for WCN chipset will likely result in firmware crash. So the recommendation > > > > > is to enable MLO (in WCN) only when all the necessary driver changes > > > > > (in development, public posting in near future) are in place. > > > > Really, these are your answers? There is regression and first reply is > > > > upstream should wait for whatever you do internally. Second answer is > > > > the same - public posting in near future? > > > > > > > > > > May be I was not clear in my response. I was not telling MLO bug fixes were > > > in the development. Actually the MLO feature itself is not enabled > > > yet with WCN chip sets. Any code changes enabling it without full feature > > > support would result in firmware crashes with the existing firmware binaries > > > available in upstream. > > > > Is there an undocumented change of the behaviour in the commit > > 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to > > single_chip_mlo_supp")? > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/qmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/qmi.c > > - if (resp.single_chip_mlo_support_valid) { > - if (resp.single_chip_mlo_support) > - ab->mlo_capable_flags |= ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; > - else > - ab->mlo_capable_flags &= ~ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; > - } > > The above logic seems to keep the initialized intra MLO support even when > single_chip_mlo_support_valid is not set. The above code removal is correct as > MLO support can not be enabled in host when firmware does not advertise it. Ack > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c > You skipped an important chunk: - ab->mlo_capable_flags = ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; > + ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; Is this an _undocumented_ change? I think it is. If the developer has described that the commit disables MLO, there would be no such questions. > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/qmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/qmi.c > > + if (resp.single_chip_mlo_support_valid && > + resp.single_chip_mlo_support) > + ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = true; > > The above code does it in right way. Overriding firmware MLO capability as done > in the submitted patch under review is obviously wrong. The firmware used to report > the issue seems to have an odd behavior: 1. it does not seem to advertise MLO > capability in single_chip_mlo_support bit and 2. expects configurations to enable > MLO from host. None of the WCN firmware available in upstream either advertises > MLO capability or expects configurations to enable MLO from host. Additionally, from the commit message: For the WCN7850 family of chipsets, since the event is not supported, assumption is made that single chip MLO is supported. However the code doesn't contain that change. Instead single chip MLO is unconditionally disabled. I guess, Neil's change should be reworked to be limited to WCN7850 only, however it must be done as it is what was expected from the commit message.
On 3/19/2025 7:03 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 06:24:57PM +0530, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >> >> >> On 3/19/2025 5:21 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 05:02:39PM +0530, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 3/19/2025 3:57 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>>> On 19/03/2025 10:06, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>> base-commit: 7eb172143d5508b4da468ed59ee857c6e5e01da6 >>>>>>>>> change-id: 20250303-topic-ath12k-fix-crash-49e9055c61a1 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> NAK since this will break QCN >>>>>>>> There is a series under internal review to address MLO issues for WCN chipsets >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ??? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The original commit is wrong, this fixes the conversion, nothing else. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nope. Driver changes to enable MLO with WCN chipset are not there yet. >>>>>> Setting the mlo capability flag without having required driver changes >>>>>> for WCN chipset will likely result in firmware crash. So the recommendation >>>>>> is to enable MLO (in WCN) only when all the necessary driver changes >>>>>> (in development, public posting in near future) are in place. >>>>> Really, these are your answers? There is regression and first reply is >>>>> upstream should wait for whatever you do internally. Second answer is >>>>> the same - public posting in near future? >>>>> >>>> >>>> May be I was not clear in my response. I was not telling MLO bug fixes were >>>> in the development. Actually the MLO feature itself is not enabled >>>> yet with WCN chip sets. Any code changes enabling it without full feature >>>> support would result in firmware crashes with the existing firmware binaries >>>> available in upstream. >>> >>> Is there an undocumented change of the behaviour in the commit >>> 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to >>> single_chip_mlo_supp")? >>> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/qmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/qmi.c >> >> - if (resp.single_chip_mlo_support_valid) { >> - if (resp.single_chip_mlo_support) >> - ab->mlo_capable_flags |= ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; >> - else >> - ab->mlo_capable_flags &= ~ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; >> - } >> >> The above logic seems to keep the initialized intra MLO support even when >> single_chip_mlo_support_valid is not set. The above code removal is correct as >> MLO support can not be enabled in host when firmware does not advertise it. > > Ack > >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c >> > > You skipped an important chunk: > > - ab->mlo_capable_flags = ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; >> + ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; > > Is this an _undocumented_ change? I think it is. If the developer has > described that the commit disables MLO, there would be no such > questions. > Right. Since MLO was WCN was not supported, this default configuration was changed to avoid potential issues due to partial MLO configurations with official upstream firmware binaries. >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/qmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/qmi.c >> >> + if (resp.single_chip_mlo_support_valid && >> + resp.single_chip_mlo_support) >> + ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = true; >> >> The above code does it in right way. Overriding firmware MLO capability as done >> in the submitted patch under review is obviously wrong. The firmware used to report >> the issue seems to have an odd behavior: 1. it does not seem to advertise MLO >> capability in single_chip_mlo_support bit and 2. expects configurations to enable >> MLO from host. None of the WCN firmware available in upstream either advertises >> MLO capability or expects configurations to enable MLO from host. > > Additionally, from the commit message: > > For the WCN7850 family of chipsets, since the event is not supported, > assumption is made that single chip MLO is supported. > > However the code doesn't contain that change. Instead single chip MLO is > unconditionally disabled. > This text in commit message seems to be a miss. This should have been removed as the merged patch version completely disables MLO for WCN chip. Vasanth
On 3/19/2025 2:46 AM, Baochen Qiang wrote: >>>>>> fw_build_id QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156- >>>>>> QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1 > > this FW version is not upstream yet, why are you testing with it? > > Generally we only support upstrmea driver + upstream FW. Thanks for pointing this out Baochen. I was wondering why I wasn't seeing any issues on my laptop. As others have commented, due to differences between firmware configuration and release processes, please avoid using firmware that isn't in https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/ath-firmware/ath12k-firmware (which gets promoted to linux-firmware). /jeff
On 3/19/2025 3:27 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 19/03/2025 10:06, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >>>>> --- >>>>> base-commit: 7eb172143d5508b4da468ed59ee857c6e5e01da6 >>>>> change-id: 20250303-topic-ath12k-fix-crash-49e9055c61a1 >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> NAK since this will break QCN >>>> There is a series under internal review to address MLO issues for WCN chipsets >>> >>> ??? >>> >>> The original commit is wrong, this fixes the conversion, nothing else. >> >> Nope. Driver changes to enable MLO with WCN chipset are not there yet. >> Setting the mlo capability flag without having required driver changes >> for WCN chipset will likely result in firmware crash. So the recommendation >> is to enable MLO (in WCN) only when all the necessary driver changes >> (in development, public posting in near future) are in place. > Really, these are your answers? There is regression and first reply is > upstream should wait for whatever you do internally. Second answer is > the same - public posting in near future? > > Can you start working with the upstream instead? There is a lot going on in this thread. I want to address the big picture. It is no secret that Qualcomm has historically focused on downstream drivers, and upstream was mostly an afterthought. But that mindset has changed. Qualcomm is fully embracing upstream kernel development, and has actively recruited (and is still recruiting!) experienced upstream Linux Kernel engineers. And in places where there are shortcoming, Qualcomm has partnered with companies like Linaro to bring in needed support. So Qualcomm is very much "working with the upstream." We may not be working well sometimes, but many of us are still inexperienced with working with the upstream. We are coming up to speed. Specifically for Wi-Fi, we have a large number of engineers who have primarily worked on downstream code who are now working on upstream (including me!). And we still have the issue that many of the products we are shipping now still have a lot of downstream DNA, especially when it comes to firmware interfaces. So please bear with us as we learn and evolve. Please keep the constructive feedback coming. And remember, the more detailed the feedback, the easier it is to incorporate the feedback. Thanks! /jeff
On 19/03/2025 12:25, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 11:29:18AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 19/03/2025 10:46, Baochen Qiang wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 3/19/2025 5:12 PM, neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On 19/03/2025 10:06, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 3/19/2025 1:34 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote: >>>>>> On 18/03/2025 17:35, Jeff Johnson wrote: >>>>>>> On 3/3/2025 7:00 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote: >>>>>>>> In commit 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to >>>>>>>> single_chip_mlo_supp") >>>>>>>> the line: >>>>>>>> ab->mlo_capable_flags = ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; >>>>>>>> was incorrectly updated to: >>>>>>>> ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; >>>>>>>> leading to always disabling INTRA_DEVICE_MLO even if the device supports it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The firmware "WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1" >>>>>>>> crashes on driver initialization with: >>>>>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: chip_id 0x2 chip_family 0x4 board_id 0x3d soc_id 0x40170200 >>>>>>>> ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x110f009c fw_build_timestamp 2024-05-30 11:35 >>>>>>>> fw_build_id QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156- >>>>>>>> QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1 >>> >>> this FW version is not upstream yet, why are you testing with it? >>> >>> Generally we only support upstrmea driver + upstream FW. >> FW does not have to be upstream. We work, here in upstream, with all >> sort of vendors and all sorts of devices, for which vendors might not >> send yet their FW or we are unclear about licensing rules. > > If you are working with non-supported firmware, then, basically, you are > on your own. I think you'd get the same response from any other vendor > shipping firmware files. Consider reporting an issue to i915 or amdgpu > driver _and_ stating that you are using some non-standard firmware files > that were not provided to you by the corresponding team. FW extracted from whatever-we-got-there is entire history of all WiFi drivers... And no one asked here for support. Best regards, Krzysztof
On 3/19/2025 7:03 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 06:24:57PM +0530, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >> >> >> On 3/19/2025 5:21 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 05:02:39PM +0530, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 3/19/2025 3:57 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>>> On 19/03/2025 10:06, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>> base-commit: 7eb172143d5508b4da468ed59ee857c6e5e01da6 >>>>>>>>> change-id: 20250303-topic-ath12k-fix-crash-49e9055c61a1 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> NAK since this will break QCN >>>>>>>> There is a series under internal review to address MLO issues for WCN chipsets >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ??? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The original commit is wrong, this fixes the conversion, nothing else. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nope. Driver changes to enable MLO with WCN chipset are not there yet. >>>>>> Setting the mlo capability flag without having required driver changes >>>>>> for WCN chipset will likely result in firmware crash. So the recommendation >>>>>> is to enable MLO (in WCN) only when all the necessary driver changes >>>>>> (in development, public posting in near future) are in place. >>>>> Really, these are your answers? There is regression and first reply is >>>>> upstream should wait for whatever you do internally. Second answer is >>>>> the same - public posting in near future? >>>>> >>>> >>>> May be I was not clear in my response. I was not telling MLO bug fixes were >>>> in the development. Actually the MLO feature itself is not enabled >>>> yet with WCN chip sets. Any code changes enabling it without full feature >>>> support would result in firmware crashes with the existing firmware binaries >>>> available in upstream. >>> >>> Is there an undocumented change of the behaviour in the commit >>> 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to >>> single_chip_mlo_supp")? >>> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/qmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/qmi.c >> >> - if (resp.single_chip_mlo_support_valid) { >> - if (resp.single_chip_mlo_support) >> - ab->mlo_capable_flags |= ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; >> - else >> - ab->mlo_capable_flags &= ~ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; >> - } >> >> The above logic seems to keep the initialized intra MLO support even when >> single_chip_mlo_support_valid is not set. The above code removal is correct as >> MLO support can not be enabled in host when firmware does not advertise it. > > Ack > >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c >> > > You skipped an important chunk: > > - ab->mlo_capable_flags = ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; >> + ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; > > Is this an _undocumented_ change? I think it is. If the developer has > described that the commit disables MLO, there would be no such > questions. > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/qmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/qmi.c >> >> + if (resp.single_chip_mlo_support_valid && >> + resp.single_chip_mlo_support) >> + ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = true; >> >> The above code does it in right way. Overriding firmware MLO capability as done >> in the submitted patch under review is obviously wrong. The firmware used to report >> the issue seems to have an odd behavior: 1. it does not seem to advertise MLO >> capability in single_chip_mlo_support bit and 2. expects configurations to enable >> MLO from host. None of the WCN firmware available in upstream either advertises >> MLO capability or expects configurations to enable MLO from host. > > Additionally, from the commit message: > > For the WCN7850 family of chipsets, since the event is not supported, > assumption is made that single chip MLO is supported. > > However the code doesn't contain that change. Instead single chip MLO is > unconditionally disabled. > > I guess, Neil's change should be reworked to be limited to WCN7850 only, > however it must be done as it is what was expected from the commit > message. > There has been lots of rework gone in to ath12k driver towards enabling MLO support for QCN chip set. As of now, MLO boot and runtime configurations are restricted to QCN chipset. WCN will not work with those MLO changes. Re-enabling single_chip_mlo_supp equivalent (single_chip_mlo_supp got cleaned up in ath/linux-next) will create issues when MLO gets enabled for WCN. Driver changes/hacks to support this non-upstream firmware specific behavior will become a major challenge over a period as new features are getting added in driver/firmware. Vasanth
Hi, On 20/03/2025 08:23, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: > > > On 3/19/2025 7:03 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 06:24:57PM +0530, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 3/19/2025 5:21 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >>>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 05:02:39PM +0530, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 3/19/2025 3:57 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>>>> On 19/03/2025 10:06, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>> base-commit: 7eb172143d5508b4da468ed59ee857c6e5e01da6 >>>>>>>>>> change-id: 20250303-topic-ath12k-fix-crash-49e9055c61a1 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> NAK since this will break QCN >>>>>>>>> There is a series under internal review to address MLO issues for WCN chipsets >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ??? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The original commit is wrong, this fixes the conversion, nothing else. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nope. Driver changes to enable MLO with WCN chipset are not there yet. >>>>>>> Setting the mlo capability flag without having required driver changes >>>>>>> for WCN chipset will likely result in firmware crash. So the recommendation >>>>>>> is to enable MLO (in WCN) only when all the necessary driver changes >>>>>>> (in development, public posting in near future) are in place. >>>>>> Really, these are your answers? There is regression and first reply is >>>>>> upstream should wait for whatever you do internally. Second answer is >>>>>> the same - public posting in near future? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> May be I was not clear in my response. I was not telling MLO bug fixes were >>>>> in the development. Actually the MLO feature itself is not enabled >>>>> yet with WCN chip sets. Any code changes enabling it without full feature >>>>> support would result in firmware crashes with the existing firmware binaries >>>>> available in upstream. >>>> >>>> Is there an undocumented change of the behaviour in the commit >>>> 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to >>>> single_chip_mlo_supp")? >>>> >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/qmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/qmi.c >>> >>> - if (resp.single_chip_mlo_support_valid) { >>> - if (resp.single_chip_mlo_support) >>> - ab->mlo_capable_flags |= ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; >>> - else >>> - ab->mlo_capable_flags &= ~ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; >>> - } >>> >>> The above logic seems to keep the initialized intra MLO support even when >>> single_chip_mlo_support_valid is not set. The above code removal is correct as >>> MLO support can not be enabled in host when firmware does not advertise it. >> >> Ack >> >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c >>> >> >> You skipped an important chunk: >> >> - ab->mlo_capable_flags = ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; >>> + ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; >> >> Is this an _undocumented_ change? I think it is. If the developer has >> described that the commit disables MLO, there would be no such >> questions. >> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/qmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/qmi.c >>> >>> + if (resp.single_chip_mlo_support_valid && >>> + resp.single_chip_mlo_support) >>> + ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = true; >>> >>> The above code does it in right way. Overriding firmware MLO capability as done >>> in the submitted patch under review is obviously wrong. The firmware used to report >>> the issue seems to have an odd behavior: 1. it does not seem to advertise MLO >>> capability in single_chip_mlo_support bit and 2. expects configurations to enable >>> MLO from host. None of the WCN firmware available in upstream either advertises >>> MLO capability or expects configurations to enable MLO from host. >> >> Additionally, from the commit message: >> >> For the WCN7850 family of chipsets, since the event is not supported, >> assumption is made that single chip MLO is supported. >> >> However the code doesn't contain that change. Instead single chip MLO is >> unconditionally disabled. >> >> I guess, Neil's change should be reworked to be limited to WCN7850 only, >> however it must be done as it is what was expected from the commit >> message. >> > > There has been lots of rework gone in to ath12k driver towards enabling > MLO support for QCN chip set. As of now, MLO boot and runtime configurations > are restricted to QCN chipset. WCN will not work with those MLO changes. > Re-enabling single_chip_mlo_supp equivalent (single_chip_mlo_supp got cleaned up in ath/linux-next) will create issues when MLO gets enabled for WCN. Driver > changes/hacks to support this non-upstream firmware specific behavior will > become a major challenge over a period as new features are getting added in driver/firmware. Making sure a driver doesn't regress with a fw is a major challenge for everyone, this is why we CI test the kernel on different platform and make sure it still works over time. Please share your roadmap with the community and add some documentation explaining which firmwares & features are currently supported and which features are in development. It's something usually done in a TODO and ROADMAP file in the driver directory. And honestly, please report a warning in the kernel when using a non-supported firmware version, because Qualcomm ships hundreds of different firmwares with cryptic namings working with different driver versions and the situation is honestly impossible to handle for developers & customers when setting up systems based on mainline Linux. Finally, it seems you only test the WCN on an x86 platform, and since you ship the WCN along (at least) the SM8550, SM8650 and SM8750 SoCs (which is like millions of phones) and since those SoCs are pretty well supported in mainline Linux, these targets should be validated aswell since they have different power-up requirements than the standalone PCIe card. Last note, there's no "upstream firmware", the linux-firmware repository is a handy collection of firmwares shared by vendors in a central place with clear reditribution licencing, but it cannot be considered as "upstream" like the Linux code is. So expliciting which firmware version is supported in the documentation and the code is the preferred way. Thanks, Neil > > Vasanth
Hi Jeff, On 19/03/2025 19:32, Jeff Johnson wrote: > On 3/19/2025 3:27 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 19/03/2025 10:06, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >>>>>> --- >>>>>> base-commit: 7eb172143d5508b4da468ed59ee857c6e5e01da6 >>>>>> change-id: 20250303-topic-ath12k-fix-crash-49e9055c61a1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>>> NAK since this will break QCN >>>>> There is a series under internal review to address MLO issues for WCN chipsets >>>> >>>> ??? >>>> >>>> The original commit is wrong, this fixes the conversion, nothing else. >>> >>> Nope. Driver changes to enable MLO with WCN chipset are not there yet. >>> Setting the mlo capability flag without having required driver changes >>> for WCN chipset will likely result in firmware crash. So the recommendation >>> is to enable MLO (in WCN) only when all the necessary driver changes >>> (in development, public posting in near future) are in place. >> Really, these are your answers? There is regression and first reply is >> upstream should wait for whatever you do internally. Second answer is >> the same - public posting in near future? >> >> Can you start working with the upstream instead? > > There is a lot going on in this thread. I want to address the big picture. It > is no secret that Qualcomm has historically focused on downstream drivers, and > upstream was mostly an afterthought. But that mindset has changed. Qualcomm is > fully embracing upstream kernel development, and has actively recruited (and > is still recruiting!) experienced upstream Linux Kernel engineers. And in > places where there are shortcoming, Qualcomm has partnered with companies like > Linaro to bring in needed support. So Qualcomm is very much "working with the > upstream." We may not be working well sometimes, but many of us are still > inexperienced with working with the upstream. We are coming up to speed. > Specifically for Wi-Fi, we have a large number of engineers who have primarily > worked on downstream code who are now working on upstream (including me!). And > we still have the issue that many of the products we are shipping now still > have a lot of downstream DNA, especially when it comes to firmware interfaces. > So please bear with us as we learn and evolve. > > Please keep the constructive feedback coming. And remember, the more detailed > the feedback, the easier it is to incorporate the feedback. Thanks for all the feedback, all this escalated mainly because the 46d16f7e1d14 commit doesn't do what is written in the commit message, and there were no clear sign MLO support with WCN firmares would be removed shortly and redeveloped later. As final note for this patch, do you have any timeline for when MLO would be enabled again on WCN chips ? I'm happy Qualcomm is embracing mainline development, but Qualcomm still ships hundreds of different incompatible firmware and downstream drivers variant in the field, and this makes system integration very hard. And as you mention the partnership with Linaro, we are very happy to help and support your mainline development over time by reviewing, testing and reporting. Thanks, Neil > > Thanks! > /jeff >
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c index 0606116d6b9c491b6ede401b2e1aedfb619339a8..33aba5fceec946fad5a47a11a4d86b7be96e682e 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c @@ -1927,7 +1927,7 @@ struct ath12k_base *ath12k_core_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t priv_size, ab->dev = dev; ab->hif.bus = bus; ab->qmi.num_radios = U8_MAX; - ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; + ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = true; /* Device index used to identify the devices in a group. *
In commit 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to single_chip_mlo_supp") the line: ab->mlo_capable_flags = ATH12K_INTRA_DEVICE_MLO_SUPPORT; was incorrectly updated to: ab->single_chip_mlo_supp = false; leading to always disabling INTRA_DEVICE_MLO even if the device supports it. The firmware "WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1" crashes on driver initialization with: ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: chip_id 0x2 chip_family 0x4 board_id 0x3d soc_id 0x40170200 ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x110f009c fw_build_timestamp 2024-05-30 11:35 fw_build_id QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00156-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1 ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: ignore reset dev flags 0x200 ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to receive wmi unified ready event: -110 ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to start core: -110 failed to send QMI message ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: qmi failed to send mode request, mode: 4, err = -5 ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: qmi failed to send wlan mode off With ab->single_chip_mlo_supp set to True, firmware loads nominally. Fixes: 46d16f7e1d14 ("wifi: ath12k: rename mlo_capable_flags to single_chip_mlo_supp") Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> --- Bisect log for reference: The bisect leaded to: git bisect start 'v6.14-rc4' 'v6.12' git bisect good 5757b31666277e2b177b406e48878dc48d587a46 git bisect bad d78794d4f4dbeac0a39e15d2fbc8e917741b5b7c git bisect bad cf33d96f50903214226b379b3f10d1f262dae018 git bisect good 12e070eb6964b341b41677fd260af5a305316a1f git bisect bad 6917d207b469ee81e6dc7f8ccca29c234a16916d git bisect good 4fefbc66dfb356145633e571475be2459d73ce16 git bisect bad a6ac667467b642c94928c24ac2eb40d20110983c git bisect bad b05d30c2b6df7e2172b18bf1baee9b202f9c6b53 git bisect good 56dcbf0b520796e26b2bbe5686bdd305ad924954 git bisect bad d302ac65ac938516487f57ae20f11e9cf6327606 git bisect good 8c2143702d0719a0357600bca0236900781ffc78 git bisect good a5686ae820fa7ab03226a3b0ff529720b7bac599 git bisect bad 6f245ea0ec6c29b90c8fa4fdf6e178c646125d7e git bisect bad 46d16f7e1d1413ad7ff99c1334d8874623717745 --- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- base-commit: 7eb172143d5508b4da468ed59ee857c6e5e01da6 change-id: 20250303-topic-ath12k-fix-crash-49e9055c61a1 Best regards,